| Literature DB >> 29710394 |
Pietro G Di Summa1, Luigi Schiraldi1, Mario Cherubino2, Carlo M Oranges3, Daniel F Kalbermatten3, Wassim Raffoul1, Srinivas Madduri3,4,5.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve regeneration is critical and challenging in the adult humans. High level of collagen infiltration (i.e., scar tissue), in the niche of injury, impedes axonal regeneration and path finding. Unfortunately, studies focusing on the modulation of scar tissue in the nerves are scarce. To address part of this problem, we have evaluated the differentiated adipose derived stem cells (dASCs) for their antifibrotic and regenerative effects in a 10 mm nerve gap model in rats. Three different animal groups (N = 5) were treated with fibrin nerve conduits (empty), or seeded with dASCs (F + dASCs) and autograft, respectively. Histological analysis of regenerated nerves, at 12 weeks postoperatively, reveled the high levels of collagen infiltration (i.e., 21.5% ± 6.1% and 24.1% ± 2.9%) in the middle and distal segment of empty conduit groups in comparison with stem cells treated (16.6% ± 2.1% and 12.1% ± 2.9%) and autograft (15.0% ± 1.7% and 12.8% ± 1.0%) animals. Thus, the dASCs treatment resulted in significant reduction of fibrotic tissue formation. Consequently, enhanced axonal regeneration and remyelination was found in the animals treated with dASCs. Interestingly, these effects of dASCs appeared to be equivalent to that of autograft treatment. Thus, the dASCs hold great potential for preventing the scar tissue formation and for promoting nerve regeneration in the adult organisms. Future experiments will focus on the validation of these findings in a critical nerve injury model. Anat Rec, 301:1714-1721, 2018.Entities:
Keywords: adipose stem cells; axonal regeneration; collagen infiltration; fibrotic tissue; remyelination; scar tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29710394 PMCID: PMC6667902 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) ISSN: 1932-8486 Impact factor: 2.064
Figure 1Phenotype characterization of differentiated adipose stem cells (dASCs). Cells were stained for GFAP (A); S100 (B); DAPI (C); and merged for triple staining (D): scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 2Cross‐sections of regenerated rat sciatic nerve from mid conduit, processed for TMB.staining (A–C); myelin surface threshold definition (D–F) and collagen‐stained threshold (G–I): scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3Cross‐sections of regenerated rat sciatic nerve from distal conduit, processed for TMB staining (A–C); myelin surface threshold definition (D–F) and collagen‐stained threshold (G–I): scale bar = 100 μm.
Quantitative measurements of processed nerve samples for myelin and collagen infiltration
| Empty | dASCs | Autograft | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurements | Mid | Distal | Mid | Distal | Mid | Distal |
| % Myelinated area ± SEM | 8.0%±3.4% | 5.8%±1.9% | 19.9%±1.7%* | 18.5%±2.3%** | 23.5%±1.1%* | 21.2%±1.2%** |
| % Collagen area ± SEM | 21.5%±6.1% | 24.1%±2.9% | 16.6%±2.1%* | 12.1%±2.9%* | 15.0%±1.7%* | 12.8%±1.0%* |
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance values denoted with the * symbol compare samples with the empty fibrin conduit group (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Figure 4Analysis of myelination in the regenerated sciatic nerve of middle (A) and distal (B) conduit region.
Figure 5Analysis of collagen infiltration in the regenerated sciatic nerve of middle (A) and distal (B) conduit region.