| Literature DB >> 29709960 |
Kenichiro Majima1, Yosuke Muraki1, Takeshi Shimamoto2.
Abstract
Objective Multiple white and flat elevated lesions (MWFLs) observed in the stomach have only been presented in abstracts at academic conferences over the last decade; therefore, relatively little is known about these lesions. Our aim was to prospectively clarify the clinical characteristics of MWFLs, to identify their risk factors and to retrospectively evaluate the clinical progression of these lesions. Methods A prospective analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors was conducted in participants who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopic screening at our hospital. A retrospective analysis of the medical chart of patients identified as having MWFLs was conducted to describe the clinical progression of these lesions. Results The prevalence rate of MWFLs was 10.4% (80/767), with the following risk factors identified on a logistic regression analysis: use of proton pump inhibitors [odds ratio (OR), 3.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.92-6.43], female sex (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.19-3.12) and a 1-year increase in age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08). Among the 70 cases with MWFLs observed over a mean duration of 2.3 years, no progression of MWFLs was detected in 67 cases (96%). Among the 3 remaining cases, progression was mild, with none of the lesions progressing to malignancy. Conclusion The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), female sex, and age are risk factors for MWFLs. We believe that endoscopists should recognize these lesions.Entities:
Keywords: esophagogastroduodenoscopy; multiple white and flat elevated lesions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29709960 PMCID: PMC6191606 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9889-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure 1.Typical multiple white and flat elevated lesions (MWFLs). MWFLs were identified in the fornix (a-c). The mucosal pattern is visible in (c).
Figure 2.Diminutive multiple white and flat elevated lesions (MWFLs), which are difficult to differentiate, become more visible using narrow-band imaging.
Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Background between Patients with and without MWFLs.
| Characteristics | Total | MWFLs | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | |||
| Numbers | 767 | 80 | 687 | |
| Sex-number. (%) | ||||
| male | 440 (57) | 37 (46) | 403 (59) | p=0.042 |
| Age-years | ||||
| mean (SD) | 60 (10) | 64 (9) | 60 (10) | <0.001 |
| Estimated | p=0.20 | |||
| no infection | 360 (47) | 36 (45) | 324 (47) | |
| current infection | 99 (13) | 6 (7.5) | 93 (14) | |
| previous infection | 308 (40) | 38 (48) | 270 (39) | |
| use of PPI-number. (%) | <0.001 | |||
| PPI | 76 (10) | 20 (25) | 56 (8.2) | |
| no use | 691 (90) | 60 (75) | 631 (92) | |
| Kimura-Takemoto classification (degree of gastric mucosal atrophy)-number. (%) | p=0.47 | |||
| no atrophy | 335 (44) | 31 (39) | 304 (44) | |
| C1-C2 (mild atrophy) | 139 (18) | 12 (15) | 127 (18) | |
| C3-O1 (moderate atrophy) | 171 (22) | 22 (28) | 149 (22) | |
| O2-O3 (severe atrophy) | 122 (16) | 15 (19) | 107 (16) | |
MWFLs: multiple white and flat elevated lesions
PPI: proton pump inhibitor
The Prevalence of MWFLs and the 95% Confidence Interval of the Prevalence.
| The prevalence % (number) | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 10.4 (80/767) | 8.4-12.8 |
| multiple lesions | 2.7 (21/767) | 1.7-4.2 |
| a few lesions | 7.7 (59/767) | 5.9-9.8 |
| Sex | ||
| male | 8.4 (37/440) | 6.0-11.4 |
| female | 13.1 (43/327) | 9.7-17.3 |
| Estimated | ||
| no infection | 10.0 (36/360) | 7.1-13.6 |
| current infection | 6.1 (6/99) | 2.3-12.7 |
| previous infection | 12.3 (38/308) | 8.9-16.5 |
| use of PPI | ||
| PPI | 26.3 (20/76) | 16.9-37.7 |
| no use | 8.7 (58/669) | 6.6-11.1 |
| Kimura-Takemoto classification (degree of gastric mucosal atrophy) | ||
| no atrophy | 9.3 (31/335) | 6.4-12.9 |
| C1-C2 (mild atrophy) | 8.6 (12/139) | 4.5-14.6 |
| C3-O1 (moderate atrophy) | 12.9 (22/171) | 8.2-18.8 |
| O2-O3 (severe atrophy) | 12.3 (15/122) | 7.0-19.5 |
MWFLs: multiple white and flat elevated lesions
PPI: proton pump inhibitor
Figure 3.Increase in the prevalence (95% confidence interval) of multiple white and flat elevated lesions (MWFLs) as a function of increasing age.
Risk Factors for MWFLs Identified by Logistic Regression Analysis.
| odds ratio | 95%CI | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female) | 1.92 | 1.19-3.12 | 0.008 |
| Aging (+1) | 1.05 | 1.02-1.08 | 0.001 |
| no | 1 | - | - |
| current infection | 0.40 | 0.16-1.03 | 0.058 |
| previous infection | 1.08 | 0.65-1.80 | 0.77 |
| use of PPI | 3.51 | 1.92-6.43 | <0.001 |
MWFLs: multiple white and flat elevated lesions
PPI: protom pump inhibitor
Figure 4.The most impressive case of mild progression in a patient in whom PPI treatment was initiated during the period of observation. From the first endoscopic image (a) to the follow-up endoscopic image (b), an increase in the thickness of the lesion was observable.