Huimin Dong1, Changzhi Xu1, Wenying Zhou1, Yuan Liao1, Junyan Cao1, Zhaoxia Li2, Bo Hu3. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, PR China. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, PR China. Electronic address: lizhaoxia@mail.sysu.edu.cn. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, PR China. Electronic address: hubo@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of serum hyaluronan (HA), procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP), type IV collagen (IVC), laminin (LN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), compared to transient elastography (FibroScan) in predicting significant liver fibrosis. METHODS: We therefore determined 4 serum fibrosis markers, FibroScan and liver biopsy in 70 consecutive adult patients with chronic hepatitis B. According to a modified Scheuer scoring system, significant fibrosis was defined as fibrosis stage ≥S2. We compared serum fibrosis markers to histological staging and FibroScan results using Spearman correlation analysis and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUROCs). RESULTS: Of the 212 patients who had the results of FibroScans and four serum fibrosis markers for HBV, 70 had concurrent liver biopsy. Significant liver fibrosis was found in 24/70 patients. The serum levels of HA, PIIINP, IVC, LN, ALT, AST was all positively correlated with fibrosis stage of Liver biopsy. The coefficients with stages were respectively 0.468, 0.392, 0.538, 0.213, 0.350, 0.375. There was a significant difference between mild fibrosis (<S2) and significant fibrosis (≥S2), excluding LN, in the levels of these 5 serum makers (P < .05). AUROC for FibroScans and HA, PIIINP, IVC, LN, ALT, AST to correctly allocate patients to histological fibrosis stage ≥ S2 was 0.866, 0.784, 0.738, 0.827, 0.630, 0.713 and 0.728 respectively. Since LN shows the worst performance of the others. We decided to check the performance of the combination of HA, PIIINP, CIV, ALT, AST, excluding LN, to distinguish fibrosis stages. The index of the histological fibrosis stage ≥ S2, combining the 5 serum markers, significantly improved diagnostic performance (AUROC = 0.861) compared to the use of 5 serum markers alone in all HBV patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of the 5 serum markers and FibroScan performed equally well in predicting significant fibrosis. The combination of the 5 serum markers is a reliable noninvasive method to predict significant liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. So, it provide another choice rather than FibroScan in predicting significant liver fibrosis.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of serum hyaluronan (HA), procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP), type IV collagen (IVC), laminin (LN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), compared to transient elastography (FibroScan) in predicting significant liver fibrosis. METHODS: We therefore determined 4 serum fibrosis markers, FibroScan and liver biopsy in 70 consecutive adult patients with chronic hepatitis B. According to a modified Scheuer scoring system, significant fibrosis was defined as fibrosis stage ≥S2. We compared serum fibrosis markers to histological staging and FibroScan results using Spearman correlation analysis and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUROCs). RESULTS: Of the 212 patients who had the results of FibroScans and four serum fibrosis markers for HBV, 70 had concurrent liver biopsy. Significant liver fibrosis was found in 24/70 patients. The serum levels of HA, PIIINP, IVC, LN, ALT, AST was all positively correlated with fibrosis stage of Liver biopsy. The coefficients with stages were respectively 0.468, 0.392, 0.538, 0.213, 0.350, 0.375. There was a significant difference between mild fibrosis (<S2) and significant fibrosis (≥S2), excluding LN, in the levels of these 5 serum makers (P < .05). AUROC for FibroScans and HA, PIIINP, IVC, LN, ALT, AST to correctly allocate patients to histological fibrosis stage ≥ S2 was 0.866, 0.784, 0.738, 0.827, 0.630, 0.713 and 0.728 respectively. Since LN shows the worst performance of the others. We decided to check the performance of the combination of HA, PIIINP, CIV, ALT, AST, excluding LN, to distinguish fibrosis stages. The index of the histological fibrosis stage ≥ S2, combining the 5 serum markers, significantly improved diagnostic performance (AUROC = 0.861) compared to the use of 5 serum markers alone in all HBV patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of the 5 serum markers and FibroScan performed equally well in predicting significant fibrosis. The combination of the 5 serum markers is a reliable noninvasive method to predict significant liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. So, it provide another choice rather than FibroScan in predicting significant liver fibrosis.
Keywords:
Alanine aminotransferase; Aspartate aminotransferase; FibroScan; Hyaluronan; Procollagen type III N-terminal peptide; Significant liver fibrosis; Type IV collagen