Claire Bailey1, Vandana Garg2, Deksha Kapoor2, Heather Wasser1, Dorairaj Prabhakaran2, Lindsay M Jaacks3. 1. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Public Health Foundation of India and Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. 3. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Electronic address: jaacks@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand factors that influence the process of food decision-making among urban Indian women in the context of the nutrition transition. DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Semistructured interviews and sorting of 12 a priori hypothesized drivers into categories of always, sometimes, and never influencing food choice. SETTING: Delhi, India. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight women aged 20-35 years selected from the roster of a prospective cohort study. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Drivers of food choice. ANALYSIS: Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated, then analyzed using an iterative, constant comparative process. Differences in pile sort rankings across tertiles of body mass index and wealth index were tested using Fisher exact tests. RESULT: Four primary themes emerged: (1) family influence; (2) cultural perceptions, with 3 subthemes of beliefs relating to (a) outside food and less healthful food, (b) seasonality, and (c) hometown food; (3) convenience, with 3 subthemes of (a) decisions regarding procurement of food, (b) not having time to cook, resulting in eating out or purchasing premade foods, and (c) eating whatever is available at home or is left over from previous meals; and (4) habit, with 2 subthemes of (a) subconscious decisions and (b) food roots. Responses from the pile sort activity revealed perceptions that food safety and health most influence food choice whereas marketing and advertisements least influence it. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Young adult women in Delhi seem to rely on preferences of their families, habits and perceptions established in childhood, convenience, and food safety and health when making choices about food. These aspects of decision-making should be targeted in future interventions aimed at improving dietary intake in this population.
OBJECTIVE: To understand factors that influence the process of food decision-making among urban Indian women in the context of the nutrition transition. DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: Semistructured interviews and sorting of 12 a priori hypothesized drivers into categories of always, sometimes, and never influencing food choice. SETTING: Delhi, India. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight women aged 20-35 years selected from the roster of a prospective cohort study. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Drivers of food choice. ANALYSIS: Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated, then analyzed using an iterative, constant comparative process. Differences in pile sort rankings across tertiles of body mass index and wealth index were tested using Fisher exact tests. RESULT: Four primary themes emerged: (1) family influence; (2) cultural perceptions, with 3 subthemes of beliefs relating to (a) outside food and less healthful food, (b) seasonality, and (c) hometown food; (3) convenience, with 3 subthemes of (a) decisions regarding procurement of food, (b) not having time to cook, resulting in eating out or purchasing premade foods, and (c) eating whatever is available at home or is left over from previous meals; and (4) habit, with 2 subthemes of (a) subconscious decisions and (b) food roots. Responses from the pile sort activity revealed perceptions that food safety and health most influence food choice whereas marketing and advertisements least influence it. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Young adult women in Delhi seem to rely on preferences of their families, habits and perceptions established in childhood, convenience, and food safety and health when making choices about food. These aspects of decision-making should be targeted in future interventions aimed at improving dietary intake in this population.
Authors: John Finley; Lindsay M Jaacks; Christian J Peters; Donald R Ort; Ashley M Aimone; Zach Conrad; Daniel J Raiten Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Wojciech Kolanowski; Ayse Demet Karaman; Filiz Yildiz Akgul; Katarzyna Ługowska; Joanna Trafialek Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laura Piombo; Gianluca Nicolella; Giulia Barbarossa; Claudio Tubili; Mayme Mary Pandolfo; Miriam Castaldo; Gianfranco Costanzo; Concetta Mirisola; Andrea Cavani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Arindam Samaddar; Rosa Paula Cuevas; Marie Claire Custodio; Jhoanne Ynion; Anindita Ray Chakravarti; Suva Kanta Mohanty; Matty Demont Journal: Int J Gastron Food Sci Date: 2020-12
Authors: Valerie L Flax; Chrissie Thakwalakwa; Courtney H Schnefke; John C Phuka; Lindsay M Jaacks Journal: Appetite Date: 2020-08-30 Impact factor: 3.868