Literature DB >> 29709229

Defibrillation testing is mandatory in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to confirm appropriate ventricular fibrillation detection.

Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux1, Sylvain Ploux2, Pierre Mondoly3, Romain Eschalier4, Marc Strik5, Laura Houard6, Bertrand Pierre7, Samuel Buliard2, Nicolas Klotz2, Philippe Ritter2, Michel Haissaguerre2, Karim Mahfouz2, Pierre Bordachar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remains a new technology requiring accurate assessment of the various aspects of its functioning. Isolated cases of delayed sensing of ventricular arrhythmia have been described.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess the quality of sensing during induced ventricular fibrillation (VF).
METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent induction of VF at the end of the S-ICD implantation.
RESULTS: VF induction was successful in 133 patients (97%). Mean time to first therapy was 16.2 ± 3.1 seconds, with a substantial range from 12.5 to 27.0 seconds. Four different detection profiles were arbitrarily defined: (1) optimal detection (n = 39 [29%]); (2) undersensing with moderate prolongation of time to therapy (<18 seconds; n = 68 [51%]); (3) undersensing with significant prolongation of the time to therapy (>18 seconds; n = 19 [14%]); and (4) absence of therapy or prolonged time to therapy related to noise oversensing (n = 7 [6%]). In some of the patients in the last group, despite induction of VF the initial counter was never filled, the device did not charge the capacitors, and the shock was not delivered because of a sustained diagnosis of noise (n = 5). A manual shock by the device or an external shock had to be delivered to restore the sinus rhythm.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a marked sensing delay leading to prolonged time to therapy in a large number of S-ICD patients. A few worrisome cases of noise oversensing inhibiting the therapies were detected. These results support the need for systematic intraoperative defibrillation testing.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Defibrillation testing; Noise; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator; Undersensing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29709229     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

Review 1.  Current Review of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Jacinthe Boulet; Emmanuelle Massie; Blandine Mondésert; Yoan Lamarche; Michel Carrier; Anique Ducharme
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

2.  Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a case report.

Authors:  Shota Tamura; Tomotaka Yoshiyama; Atsushi Doi; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  Induced atrial fibrillation during defibrillation test on implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Ki-Hun Kim; Sang-Hoon Seol; Jino Park; Yeo-Jeong Song; Seunghwan Kim; Dong-Kie Kim
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with ectopia cordis.

Authors:  Tam Dan N Pham; Anne-Marie Valente; John E Mayer; Elizabeth S DeWitt; Douglas Y Mah
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.