Literature DB >> 29708828

Single Session of Robotic Human Cadaver Training: The Immediate Impact on Urology Residents in a Teaching Hospital.

Riccardo Bertolo1, Juan Garisto1, Julien Dagenais1, Daniel Sagalovich1, Jihad H Kaouk1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate impact of robotic human cadaver training on the confidence with robotic surgery among urology residents.
METHODS: After a preliminary survey assessing baseline skills, our institution's urology residents attended a single session of robotic training on fresh-frozen human cadavers, supervised by staff urologists. Post-training, both the residents and the supervisors were administered a survey querying the improvement of robotic skills and the sentiments toward the cadaver laboratory compared with alternative trainings (answers were given by Likert scale: 1 = negative/5 = positive).
RESULTS: Twenty-two residents and five supervisors completed the surveys. Median residents' age was 32 years (IQR 29-33). Median year of residency was 4 (IQR 3-6). One hundred percent of the residents were familiar with robotics (86.4% had previous experience as bedside assistant; 90.9% have performed a median of 15 procedures at console). Post-training the residents evaluated their confidence with port placement and docking, EndoWrist® manipulation, Camera and Clutching, Fourth Arm Integration, and Needle Control and Driving with median scores of 4 (IQR 4-5), 4 (IQR 4-5), 4 (IQR 4-5), 4 (IQR 4-4), and 4 (IQR 3-4), with significant perceived improvement in all skills (P < .045). Almost all of them (86.4%) rated the cadaver training 5. When asked about the superiority of human cadaver training with respect to the virtual simulator and the pig laboratory, residents gave median scores of 5 (IQR 5-5) and 4 (IQR 3-5). At univariate analysis, increased experience with robotics was found to be inversely associated with improvement in the "camera and clutching" skill (P < .048). The supervisors felt that human cadaver training was effective in improving the residents' robotic skills (median answer of 5, IQR 4-5).
CONCLUSIONS: Human cadaver robotic training demonstrated great acceptability among both the residents and the supervisors. It allowed for immediate improvement of the residents' robotic skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cadaver; robot; simulation; skills; surgery; training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29708828     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  4 in total

Review 1.  Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.

Authors:  Brandon S Childs; Marc D Manganiello; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.

Authors:  H K James; A W Chapman; G T R Pattison; D R Griffin; J D Fisher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  From cadaveric and animal studies to the clinical reality of robotic mastectomy: a feasibility report of training program.

Authors:  Jeea Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Dong Won Lee; Seung Yong Song; Jonghan Yu; Jai Min Ryu; Soong June Bae; Dea Hyun Lew; Seung Il Kim; Antonio Toesca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Five Years of the CC-ERUS Fellowship: A Survey of the Experiences and Post-fellowship Work of the Fellows.

Authors:  Alexander J W Beulens; Paulo Dell'Oglio; Hannah Kiss; Willem M Brinkman; Alessandro Larcher; Alexandre Mottrie; Christian Wagner; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.