| Literature DB >> 29707985 |
Katarzyna Kolasa1, Vladimir Zah2, Marta Kowalczyk3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As budget constraints become more and more visible, there is growing recognition for greater transparency and greater stakeholders' engagement in the pharmaceuticals' pric-ing&reimbursement (P&R) decision making. New frameworks of drugs' value assessments are searched for. Among them, the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) receives more and more attention. In 2014, ISPOR established Task Force to provide methodological recommendations for MCDA utilization in the health care decision making. Still, there is not so much knowledge about the real life experience with MCDA's adaptation to the P&R processes. AREAS COVERED: A systematic literature review was performed to understand the rationale for MCDA adaptation, methodology used as well as its impact on P&R outcomes. EXPERT COMMENTARY: In total 102 hits were found through the search of databases, out of which 18 publications were selected. Although limited in scope, the review highlighted how MCDA can im-prove the decision making processes not only regarding pricing & reimbursement but also contribute to the the risk benefit assessment as well as optimization of treatment outcomes. Still none of re-viewed studies did report how MCDA results actually impacted the real life settings.Entities:
Keywords: MCDA; Multi-criteria decision analysis; drugs’ value assessment; systematic literature review; systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29707985 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1467759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ISSN: 1473-7167 Impact factor: 2.217