| Literature DB >> 29707493 |
Mita Munshi1, Khairun Nafiz Tumu1, Md Nazmul Hasan1, Md Ziaul Amin1.
Abstract
This study assesses the biochemical effects of commercially available fish feedstuffs on the fry of climbing perch (Anabas testudineus). Subsequently, its impact on experimental animal, Swiss albino mice, is also examined. In order to access the impact of commercial fish feed and feed consumption fish on the experimental animal, the proximate, biochemical and histopathological analyses were done using standard methods. The proximate composition as well as the concentrations of Pb, Ni, Mn, As, Zn, and Cd in the fish feed, different parts of the A. testudineus fish and different parts of the A. testudineus fish-treated experimental mice liver, were all determined using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Spectrometry. The highest levels of Cr, Pb and As were observed in the liver of Swiss albino mice treated with FFT2 and FFBB2 and their concentrations were 0.156, 0.491, 0.172 μg/g and 0.166, 0.771, 0.157 μg/g respectively. No significant changes of protein, fat, crude fiber, moisture and ash contents were observed after proximate composition analysis of fish feeds, A. testudineus and A. testudineus treated experimental mice. Significant amounts of heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Zn Cu, Ni) were found in fish feed, different parts of A. testudineus fish and in the experimental mice. However, remarkably high amounts were observed in the A. testudineus fish's head and bone with body parts. Biochemical analysis of blood samples of A. testudineus fish treated experimental mice indicated that the cholesterol, TG, LDL and glucose levels were significantly higher. Yet no significant alteration in the HDL level was observed when compared to the control. In histopathological analysis, a remarkable degeneration was observed in the liver and kidney of A. testudineus treated mice. It can therefore be concluded that although A. testudineus has nutritional benefits the quality of this fish may be compromised as a consequence of contamination through various anthropogenic activities. This analysis suggests the commercial fish feed producers must take special caution to reduce the toxic metals in various fish feed products and make it nutritionally rich and safe for fish to eat. Finally, it needs to be safe for human consumption as well.Entities:
Keywords: Anabas testudineus; Biochemical effects; Commercial feedstuff; Heavy metal; Histopathological analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29707493 PMCID: PMC5918162 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.04.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Comparison between experimental results and certified values (mg kg1, dry weight, Dorm-2).
| Element | Results obtained | Certified values | Relative error (%) | CV (%) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | 15.80 ± 0.569 | 18.0 | 5.89 | 5.84 × 10−5 | 93.72 |
| Cr | 30.87 ± 0.9863 | 34.70 | 9.34 | 3.8 × 10−4 | 86.66 |
| Pb | 0.0503 ± 0.1184 | 0.065 | −7.69 | 4.04 × 10−4 | 109.23 |
| Hg | 4.916 ± 0.825 | 4.64 | −4.56 | 4.08 × 10−4 | 104.95 |
| Co | 0.253 ± 0.0375 | 0.182 | 1.89 | 3.43 × 10−4 | 104.40 |
Fig. 1Graphical representation of the proximity composition of two types of fish feedstuffs used in the experimental study. The blue bar FF1 represents the fish feedstuffs forA. testudineus starter crumble and the red bar FF2 represents the fish feedstuffs for grower pellet. The longest blue bar FF1 indicates the highest amount of protein present in the FF1 feedstuffs.
Analysis of heavy metals and trace elements (V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Pb) in fish feed samples on dry weight basis (μg/g).
| Elements | FF1 (Commercial Feed) Concentration μg/g (M ± SE) | FF2 (Commercial Feed) Concentration μg/g (M ± SE) | Certified value μg/g |
|---|---|---|---|
| V | 1.18 ± 0.57 | < | – |
| Cr | 10.58 ± 7.95 | 15.03 ± 7.88 | – |
| Mn | 30.28 ± 5.77 | 39.12 ± 5.77 | – |
| Fe | 194.62 ± 6.86 | 199.96 ± 6.73 | – |
| Co | < | < | – |
| Ni | 2.10 ± 1.83 | 3.31 ± 1.81 | – |
| Cu | 2.53 ± 0.43 | 2.15 ± 0.42 | 25 |
| Zn | 154.37 ± 7.01 | 140.37 ± 3.86 | 250 |
| As | 7.29 ± 5.00 | < | 15 |
| Se | 5.26 ± 1.62 | 3.09 ± 1.54 | 2 |
| Sr | 6.49 ± 1.61 | 8.20 ± 1.43 | – |
| Pb | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 10 |
FF1-Commercial Fish Feed 1 (Kai Starter Crumble); FF2-Commercial Fish Feed 1 (Kai Grower Pellet); EU: European Union; AFCO: Association of Feed Control Officials. M = Mean; SE = Standard Error.
Proximity in the different parts of the fish feed-treated Anabas testudineus.
| Sample code | FFH1 | FFB1 | FFBB1 | FFT1 | FFH2 | FFB2 | FFBB2 | FFT2 | Certified value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude fat | 14.31 ± 0.77 | 7.34 ± 0.59 | 11.07 ± 0.361 | 9.31 ± 0.740 | 16.13 ± 0.23 | 8.15 ± 0.125 | 12.203 ± 0.28 | 10.99 ± 0.03 | |
| Crude fiber | 0.60 ± 0.215 | 1.070 ± 0.01 | 1.16 ± 0.012 | 0.560 ± 0.040 | 0.65 ± 0.172 | 1.080 ± 0.03 | 1.256 ± 0.137 | 0.683 ± 0.02 | |
| Crude protein | 6.393 ± 0.71 | 13.07 ± 0.11 | 24.58 ± 0.602 | 10.13 ± 0.470 | 7.20 ± 1.00 | 14.29 ± 0.15 | 22.513 ± 0.31 | 10.27 ± 0.31 | 13.9 ± 0.3 |
| Ash | 6.523 ± 0.14 | 7.276 ± 0.15 | 4.86 ± 0.380 | 6.563 ± 0.139 | 7.483 ± 0.13 | 8.370 ± 0.12 | 5.456 ± 0.280 | 6.546 ± 0.24 | 0.7 ± 0.41 |
| Moisture | 59.95 ± 0.27 | 56.92 ± 0.24 | 65.98 ± 0.489 | 62.27 ± 0.790 | 60.74 ± 0.11 | 63.93 ± 0.46 | 68.033 ± 0.49 | 64.08 ± 0.38 | 70.3 ± 1.7 |
| Sodium (Na) | 0.543 ± 0.04 | 0.636 ± 0.04 | 2.03 ± 0.476 | 0.536 ± 0.017 | 0.660 ± 0.03 | 1.386 ± 0.02 | 1.646 ± 0.017 | 1.453 ± 0.09 | 60.5 ± 8.5 |
| Iron (Fe) | 1.663 ± 0.33 | 1.273 ± 0.10 | 2.32 ± 0.552 | 3.726 ± 0.043 | 1.806 ± 0.04 | 1.530 ± 0.20 | 1.67 ± 0.015 | 1.693 ± 0.14 | 2.0 ± 0.15 |
| Vitamin C | 0.037 ± 0.09 | 0.032 ± 0.00 | 0.0260 ± 0.00 | 0.0237 ± 0.00 | 0.031 ± 0.01 | 0.025 ± 0.00 | 0.024 ± 0.002 | 0.038 ± 0.02 |
FFH1 = Head part; 45–50 days; 65–85 gm; FF1 fish feed; Anabas testudineus, FFB1 = Body with bone part; 45–50 days; 65–85 gm; FF1 fish feed, FFBB1 = Body without bone part; 45–50 days; 65–85 gm; FF1 fish feed, FFT1 = Tail part; 45–50 days; 65–85 gm; FF1 fish feed, FFH2 = Head part; 75–80 days; 225–250 gm; FF2 fish feed, FFB2 = Body with bone part; 75–80 days; 225–250 gm;FF2 fish feed, FFBB2 = Body without bone part; 75–80 days; 225–250 gm;FF2 fish feed, FFT2 = Tail part; 75–80 days; 225–250 gm; FF2 fish feed.
Analysis of heavy metals (V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Pb) present in different parts of the fish feed-treated A. testudineus.
| Sample code | FFH1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFB1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFBB1Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFT1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFH2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFB2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFBB2 Conc μg/g (M ± E) | FFT2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | Standard Conc. μg/g (M ± E) (M ± E) (M ± E) μg/g (M ± E) | Certified value μg/g (M ± E) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | BDL | 0.73 ± 0.5 | 0.76 ± 0.6 | BDL | BDL | BDL | 1.00 ± 0.6 | BDL | ||
| Cr | 18.30 ± 7.9 | BDL | BDL | 24.0 ± 8.3 | 25.4 ± 8.1 | BDL | BDL | 17.1 ± 8.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Mn | 15.94 ± 5.9 | 11.5 ± 5.7 | BDL | BDL | 15.9 ± 5.6 | 7.1 ± 5.60 | BDL | BDL | 20 | |
| Fe | 80.13 ± 5.9 | 81.1 ± 6.1 | 98.7 ± 6.1 | 111 ± 6.3 | 52.1 ± 7.7 | 75.2 ± 6.0 | 85.7 ± 6.0 | 69.4 ± 5.9 | ||
| Co | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | ||
| Ni | 3.60 ± 1.81 | 5.43 ± 1.9 | 5.66 ± 1.8 | 8.09 ± 1.9 | BDL | 7.02 ± 1.4 | 3.26 ± 1.8 | 3.69 ± 1.8 | ||
| Cu | 1.38 ± 0.42 | 0.74 ± 0.4 | 1.70 ± 0.6 | 2.25 ± 0.4 | 0.62 ± 0.2 | 0.75 ± 0.41 | 1.40 ± 0.4 | 2.00 ± 0.4 | 10 | 30 |
| Zn | 91.0 ± 3.50 | 90.9 ± 3.5 | 89.7 ± 3.6 | 97.6 ± 3.7 | 81.3 ± 3.4 | 87.83 ± 3.5 | 85.6 ± 3.6 | 83.6 ± 3.5 | 30 | 30 |
| As | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| Se | 8.04 ± 1.58 | 6.13 ± 1.6 | 5.64 ± 0.6 | 5.28 ± 1.7 | 3.98 ± 1.5 | 8.84 ± 1.67 | 1.86 ± 1.6 | 5.84 ± 1.6 | 2. 0 | 0.3 |
| Sr | 120.3 ± 1.8 | 75.1 ± 1.6 | 32.2 ± 1.4 | 125 ± 1.3 | 94.2 ± 2.1 | 92.67 ± 1.7 | 35.3 ± 1.4 | 93.0 ± 1.8 | ||
| Pb | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.1 | 0.43 ± 0.1 | 0.44 ± 0.1 | 0.31 ± 0.1 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.1 | 0.41 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
M = Mean; SE = Standard Error, BDL: Below detection limit, Standards: FAO /WHO, FAO [12], Turkish guidelines.
Analysis of heavy metals (Cr, Pb, As) present in liver of the mice treated with A. testudineus.
| Sample code | FFH1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFB1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFBB1Conc.μg/g (M ± E) | FFT1 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFH2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFB2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFBB2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | FFT2 Conc. μg/g (M ± E) | Control | Certified value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 0.15 ± 0.1 | 0.07 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.156 ± 0.0 | 0.15 ± 0.0 | 0.06 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.17 ± 0.0 | 0.051 ± 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Pb | 0.42 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.1 | 0.49 ± 0.1 | 0.34 ± 0.0 | 0.49 ± 0.0 | 0.62 ± 0.1 | 0.77 ± 0.1 | 0.74 ± 0.0 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.470 ± 0.024 |
| As | 0.16 ± 0.1 | 0.17 ± 0.1 | 0.17 ± 0.0 | 0.16 ± 0.1 | 0.16 ± 0.1 | 0.16 ± 0.1 | 0.15 ± 0.0 | 0.16 ± 0.0 | 0.15 ± 0.05 |
M = Mean; SE = Standard Error.
Determination of lipid profile and glucose level in the blood serum of A. testudineus for fish-treated experimental Swiss albino mouse.
| Biochemical Parameter (mmol/L) (M ± SE) | Sample code | Certified value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FFH1 | FFB1 | FFBB1 | FFT1 | FFH2 | FFB2 | FFBB2 | FFT2 | ||
| Cholesterol | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.6 | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 5.8 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 9.3 ± 0.1 | 12.4 ± 2.8 | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | <11 |
| Triglycerides | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | <8.325 |
| HDL | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | >3.33 |
| LDL | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | <7.21 |
| Glucose | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 5.0 ± 0.9 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.7 | 5.4 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 3.5-5.5 |
M = Mean; SE = Standard Error, HDL = High density lipoprotein, LDL = low density lipoprotein.
Fig. 2Effect of heavy metal content fish meat on the liver of the mice; (a) A photomicrograph of a liver section of a mice (treated with 5 g of FFT2 fish sample as diet for 5weeks) showing hydropic degeneration predominantly in midzone. Arrow indicates this.
(b) A photomicrograph of liver section from control mice (treated with 5 g of normal parched rice as diet for 5weeks). (b1) Control reveals normal liver parenchyma with central vein (CV). (b2) portal triad (HAB : Hepatic artery branch; PVB: Portal vein branch; BD: Bile duct).
Fig. 3(a) A photomicrograph of a kidney section of a mice (treated with 5 g of FFT2 fish sample as diet for 5 weeks) showing mild degenerative changes in the straight proximal tubules. Arrow indicates nuclei with inclusions. (b) A photomicrograph of the kidney section from control mice (treated with 5 g of normal parched rice as diet for 5 weeks) showing no degenerative changes.