S Steve Zhou1, Salimatu Lukula1, Cory Chiossone1, Raymond W Nims2, Donna B Suchmann1, M Khalid Ijaz3,4. 1. Microbac Laboratories, Sterling, VA, USA. 2. RMC Pharmaceutical Solutions, Inc., Longmont, CO, USA. 3. Research and Development, RB, Montvale, NJ, USA. 4. Medgar Evers College of the City University of New York (CUNY), Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevention of infection with airborne pathogens and exposure to airborne particulates and aerosols (environmental pollutants and allergens) can be facilitated through use of disposable face masks. The effectiveness of such masks for excluding pathogens and pollutants is dependent on the intrinsic ability of the masks to resist penetration by airborne contaminants. This study evaluated the relative contributions of a mask, valve, and Micro Ventilator on aerosol filtration efficiency of a new N95 respiratory face mask. METHODS: The test mask was challenged, using standardized methods, with influenza A and rhinovirus type 14, bacteriophage ΦΧ174, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and model pollutants. The statistical significance of results obtained for different challenge microbial agents and for different mask configurations (masks with operational or nonoperational ventilation fans and masks with sealed Smart Valves) was assessed. RESULTS: The results demonstrate >99.7% efficiency of each test mask configuration for exclusion of influenza A virus, rhinovirus 14, and S. aureus and >99.3% efficiency for paraffin oil and sodium chloride (surrogates for PM2.5). Statistically significant differences in effectiveness of the different mask configurations were not identified. The efficiencies of the masks for excluding smaller-size (i.e., rhinovirus and bacteriophage ΦΧ174) vs. larger-size microbial agents (influenza virus, S. aureus) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The masks, with or without features intended for enhancing comfort, provide protection against both small- and large-size pathogens. Importantly, the mask appears to be highly efficient for filtration of pathogens, including influenza and rhinoviruses, as well as the fine particulates (PM2.5) present in aerosols that represent a greater challenge for many types of dental and surgical masks. This renders this individual-use N95 respiratory mask an improvement over the former types of masks for protection against a variety of environmental contaminants including PM2.5 and pathogens such as influenza and rhinoviruses.
BACKGROUND: Prevention of infection with airborne pathogens and exposure to airborne particulates and aerosols (environmental pollutants and allergens) can be facilitated through use of disposable face masks. The effectiveness of such masks for excluding pathogens and pollutants is dependent on the intrinsic ability of the masks to resist penetration by airborne contaminants. This study evaluated the relative contributions of a mask, valve, and Micro Ventilator on aerosol filtration efficiency of a new N95 respiratory face mask. METHODS: The test mask was challenged, using standardized methods, with influenza A and rhinovirus type 14, bacteriophage ΦΧ174, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and model pollutants. The statistical significance of results obtained for different challenge microbial agents and for different mask configurations (masks with operational or nonoperational ventilation fans and masks with sealed Smart Valves) was assessed. RESULTS: The results demonstrate >99.7% efficiency of each test mask configuration for exclusion of influenza A virus, rhinovirus 14, and S. aureus and >99.3% efficiency for paraffin oil and sodium chloride (surrogates for PM2.5). Statistically significant differences in effectiveness of the different mask configurations were not identified. The efficiencies of the masks for excluding smaller-size (i.e., rhinovirus and bacteriophage ΦΧ174) vs. larger-size microbial agents (influenza virus, S. aureus) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The masks, with or without features intended for enhancing comfort, provide protection against both small- and large-size pathogens. Importantly, the mask appears to be highly efficient for filtration of pathogens, including influenza and rhinoviruses, as well as the fine particulates (PM2.5) present in aerosols that represent a greater challenge for many types of dental and surgical masks. This renders this individual-use N95 respiratory mask an improvement over the former types of masks for protection against a variety of environmental contaminants including PM2.5 and pathogens such as influenza and rhinoviruses.
Authors: C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Robert E Thewlis; Abhishek Vishnu; Kristina A Davis; Gang Cao; Jan E Palmer; Karen E Clark; Melanie A Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Donald H Beezhold Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Delbert A Harnish; Brian K Heimbuch; Charles Balzli; Melanie Choe; April E Lumley; Ronald E Shaffer; Joseph D Wander Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2016 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Gerard Hoek; Ranjini M Krishnan; Rob Beelen; Annette Peters; Bart Ostro; Bert Brunekreef; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Donald K Milton; M Patricia Fabian; Benjamin J Cowling; Michael L Grantham; James J McDevitt Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Chih-Chia Hsieh; Chih-Hao Lin; William Yu Chung Wang; David J Pauleen; Jengchung Victor Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vigneshwaran Shanmugam; Karthik Babu; Thomas F Garrison; Antonio J Capezza; Richard T Olsson; Seeram Ramakrishna; Mikael S Hedenqvist; Shuvra Singha; Mattia Bartoli; Mauro Giorcelli; Gabriel Sas; Michael Försth; Oisik Das; Ágoston Restás; Filippo Berto Journal: J Appl Polym Sci Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 3.125