| Literature DB >> 29707013 |
Jaiane Bandoli Monteiro1, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva1, João Paulo Mendes Tribst1, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges1, Rubens Nisie Tango1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the influence of the resection angle on the stress distribution of retrograde endodontic treated maxillary incisors under oblique-load application. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A maxillary central incisor which was endodontically treated and restored with a fiber glass post was obtained in a 3-dimensional numerical model and distributed into three groups according to type of resection: control; restored with fiber post without retrograde obturation, R45 and R90 with 45º and 90º resection from tooth axial axis, respectively and restored with Fuji II LC (GC America). The numerical models received a 45º occlusal load of 200 N/cm2 on the middle of lingual surface. All materials and structures were considered linear elastic, homogeneous and isotropic. Numerical models were plotted and meshed with isoparametric elements, and the results were analyzed using maximum principal stress (MPS).Entities:
Keywords: Apicectomy; Cut Angle; Dental Stress Analysis; Endodontics; Finite Element Analysis; Resection Angle
Year: 2018 PMID: 29707013 PMCID: PMC5911292 DOI: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.19089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Endod J ISSN: 1735-7497
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the sequentially performed procedures. A) Ceramic crown; B) Resin cement; C) Core; D) Fiber post; E) Resin cement; F) Root with the apical third resected at 90°; G) Root without resection; H) Root with the apical third resected at 45°; I) Periodontal ligament; J) Medullar bone; K) Cortical bone; L) Gums; M) Final geometry; N) Lateral vision of a incisor restored with a fiber post; O) Lateral vision of a incisor restored with a fiber post and with a resection at 45°; P) Lateral vision of a incisor restored with a fiber post and with a resection at 90°
Distribution of mechanical properties of the materials
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ligament | 0.069 | 0.45 |
| Dentin | 18.6 | 0.32 |
| Gums | 0.003 | 0.45 |
| Cortical Bone | 13.7 | 0.30 |
| Trabecular Bone | 1.37 | 0.30 |
| Rely X ARC cement (3M ESPE) | 5.1 | 0.27 |
| Gutta Percha | 0.69 | 0.45 |
| Fiberglass Post | 49 | 0.28 |
| Lithium Dissilicate IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent) | 82.3 | 0.22 |
| Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement Fuji II LC (GC America) | 10.8 | 0.30 |
Group distribution according to the resection angle and numbers of nodes and tetrahedral solid elements
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | 262144 | 13294 |
|
| 45° | 231702 | 12987 |
|
| 90° | 228626 | 125659 |
Figure 2Maximum Principal Stress (MPa) distribution according to the structures. A) Fiber post; B) Cement line; C) root dentin; D) Bone tissue. From left to right: control group, R45 and R90
Figure 3Higher values of Maximum Principal Stress (MPa) according to the structures (Fiber post, Cement line and Root dentin) and resection angle