| Literature DB >> 29706826 |
Andrew Leiker1, Gaurav Khatri2, Jeffrey Meyer3.
Abstract
There are differing definitions regarding what portion of the large intestine should be considered "rectum" as opposed to "colon." The transition from intra- to extraperitoneal rectum results in potentially disparate patterns of spread for rectal cancer dependent on tumor location relative to the peritoneal reflection. Here we report the case of a 50-year-old woman with a mid to upper rectal adenocarcinoma who presented with a synchronous biopsy-proven tumor implant in the peritoneal cavity. Her case highlights issues of varying definitions of organ anatomy within the literature, the role of primary tumor localization within different compartments of the abdominopelvic cavity for predicting potential routes of tumor spread, and the implications for adjuvant therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Colon cancer; intraperitoneal metastases; rectal cancer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29706826 PMCID: PMC5914475 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1435119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ISSN: 0899-8280