Literature DB >> 29706804

Building a potential wetland restoration indicator for the contiguous United States.

Elena K Horvath1, Jay R Christensen2, Megan H Mehaffey3, Anne C Neale3.   

Abstract

Wetlands provide key functions in the landscape from improving water quality, to regulating flows, to providing wildlife habitat. Over half of the wetlands in the contiguous United States (CONUS) have been converted to agricultural and urban land uses. However, over the last several decades, research has shown the benefits of wetlands to hydrologic, chemical, biological processes, spurring the creation of government programs and private initiatives to restore wetlands. Initiatives tend to focus on individual wetland creation, yet the greatest benefits are achieved when strategic restoration planning occurs across a watershed or multiple watersheds. For watershed-level wetland restoration planning to occur, informative data layers on potential wetland areas are needed. We created an indicator of potential wetland areas (PWA), using nationally available datasets to identify characteristics that could support wetland ecosystems, including: poorly drained soils and low-relief landscape positions as indicated by a derived topographic data layer. We compared our PWA with the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) from 11 states throughout the CONUS to evaluate their alignment. The state-level percentage of NWI-designated wetlands directly overlapping the PWA ranged from 39 to 95%. When we included NWI that was immediately adjacent to the overlapping NWI, our range of correspondence to NWI ranged from 60 to 99%. Wetland restoration is more likely on certain landscapes (e.g., agriculture) than others due to the lack of substantive infrastructure and the potential for the restoration of hydrology; therefore, we combined the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) with the PWA to identify potentially restorable wetlands on agricultural land (PRW-Ag). The PRW-Ag identified a total of over 46 million ha with the potential to support wetlands. The largest concentrations of PRW-Ag occurred in the glaciated corn belt of the upper Mississippi River from Ohio to the Dakotas and in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. The PRW-Ag layer could assist land managers in identifying sites that may qualify for enrollment in conservation programs, where planners can coordinate restoration efforts, or where decision makers can target resources to optimize the services provided across a watershed or multiple watersheds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contiguous United States; Ecosystem services; EnviroAtlas; Geographic information systems; Mapping methods; Wetland restoration

Year:  2017        PMID: 29706804      PMCID: PMC5920525          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Indic        ISSN: 1470-160X            Impact factor:   4.958


  12 in total

1.  Identifying riparian sinks for watershed nitrate using soil surveys.

Authors:  A E Rosenblatt; A J Gold; M H Stolt; P M Groffman; D Q Kellogg
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Progress in wetland restoration ecology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Integrating objectives and scales for planning and implementing wetland restoration and creation in agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  D Moreno-Mateos; F A Comin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Timing of riverine export of nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural watersheds in Illinois: implications for reducing nutrient loading to the Mississippi River.

Authors:  Todd V Royer; Mark B David; Lowell E Gentry
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Geomorphological methods to characterise wetlands at the scale of the Seine watershed.

Authors:  F Curie; S Gaillard; A Ducharne; H Bendjoudi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction I: a geographical allocation framework.

Authors:  Matthew W Diebel; Jeffrey T Maxted; Peter J Nowak; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River Basin.

Authors:  Mark B David; Laurie E Drinkwater; Gregory F McIsaac
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions.

Authors:  Anna M Michalak; Eric J Anderson; Dmitry Beletsky; Steven Boland; Nathan S Bosch; Thomas B Bridgeman; Justin D Chaffin; Kyunghwa Cho; Rem Confesor; Irem Daloglu; Joseph V Depinto; Mary Anne Evans; Gary L Fahnenstiel; Lingli He; Jeff C Ho; Liza Jenkins; Thomas H Johengen; Kevin C Kuo; Elizabeth Laporte; Xiaojian Liu; Michael R McWilliams; Michael R Moore; Derek J Posselt; R Peter Richards; Donald Scavia; Allison L Steiner; Ed Verhamme; David M Wright; Melissa A Zagorski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Algal blooms: noteworthy nitrogen.

Authors:  Hans W Paerl; Wayne S Gardner; Mark J McCarthy; Benjamin L Peierls; Steven W Wilhelm
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Incorporating Uncertainty Into the Ranking of SPARROW Model Nutrient Yields From Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin Watersheds.

Authors:  Dale M Robertson; Gregory E Schwarz; David A Saad; Richard B Alexander
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.