Literature DB >> 29705619

The fate of polar trace organic compounds in the hyporheic zone.

Jonas L Schaper1, Wiebke Seher2, Gunnar Nützmann3, Anke Putschew4, Martin Jekel4, Jörg Lewandowski3.   

Abstract

The hyporheic zone (HZ) is often considered to efficiently remove polar trace organic compounds (TrOCs) from lotic systems, mitigating potential adverse effects of TrOCs on ecosystem functioning and drinking water production. Predicting the fate of TrOCs in the hyporheic zone (HZ) is difficult as the in-situ removal rate constants are not known and the biogeochemical factors as well as hydrological conditions controlling the removal efficiency are not fully understood. To determine the in-situ removal efficiency of the HZ for a variety of TrOCs as a function of the biogeochemical milieu, we conducted a field study in an urban river near Berlin, Germany. Subsurface flow was studied by time series of temperature depth profiles and the biogeochemical milieu of the HZ by concentration depth profiles. These results, in conjunction with a 1D advection-dispersion transport model, were used to calculate first-order removal rate constants of several polar TrOCs in the HZ. For the majority of TrOCs investigated, removal rate constants were strongly dependent on redox conditions, with significantly higher removal rates observed under predominantly suboxic (i.e. denitrifying) compared to anoxic (i.e. Fe and Mn reducing) conditions. Compared to previous studies on the fate of TrOCs in saturated sediments, half-lives within oxic/suboxic sections of the HZ were relatively low, attributable to the site-specific characteristics of the HZ in a stream dominated by wastewater treatment plant effluent. For nine out of thirteen investigated TrOCs, concentrations decreased significantly in the HZ with relative removal percentages ranging from 32% for primidone to 77% for gabapentin. For many TrOCs, removal efficiency decreased drastically as redox conditions became anoxic. For the majority of compounds investigated here, the HZ indeed acts as an efficient bioreactor that is capable of removing TrOCs along relatively short flow paths. Depending on the TrOC, removal capacity may be enhanced by either increasing the magnitude of groundwater-surface exchange fluxes, by increasing the total residence time in the HZ or the exposure time to suboxic zones, respectively.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotransformation; Organic micropollutants; Pharmaceuticals; Removal efficiency; Urban water cycle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29705619     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Bacterial Diversity Controls Transformation of Wastewater-Derived Organic Contaminants in River-Simulating Flumes.

Authors:  Malte Posselt; Jonas Mechelke; Cyrus Rutere; Claudia Coll; Anna Jaeger; Muhammad Raza; Karin Meinikmann; Stefan Krause; Anna Sobek; Jörg Lewandowski; Marcus A Horn; Juliane Hollender; Jonathan P Benskin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Nontarget Screening Reveals Time Trends of Polar Micropollutants in a Riverbank Filtration System.

Authors:  Vittorio Albergamo; Jennifer E Schollée; Emma L Schymanski; Rick Helmus; Harrie Timmer; Juliane Hollender; Pim de Voogt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The effect of unsteady streamflow and stream-groundwater interactions on oxygen consumption in a sandy streambed.

Authors:  Jason Galloway; Aryeh Fox; Jörg Lewandowski; Shai Arnon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Simultaneous attenuation of trace organics and change in organic matter composition in the hyporheic zone of urban streams.

Authors:  Birgit M Mueller; Hanna Schulz; Robert E Danczak; Anke Putschew; Joerg Lewandowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.