M Owen Papuga1, Alicia L Barnes2. 1. New York Chiropractic College, 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148, United States. Electronic address: opapuga@nycc.edu. 2. New York Chiropractic College, 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The inefficiency associated with collecting standard validated instruments has been a barrier to routine use. We utilized computer adaptive testing (CAT) instruments available through Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and correlated these with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHODS: All measurements were collected at a routine chiropractic visit. The ODI assessment was used for comparison as a widely used patient reported outcomes instrument. RESULTS: The average time to complete all questions during an office visit was 170 ± 67 s (average ± Stdev) to answer 25 ± 6 questions. Regression analysis revealed a good linear fit between ODI and both PROMIS pain behavior and physical function with R2 values of 0.5219 and 0.6754 respectively, and a good linear fit between anxiety and depression with R2 values of 0.5236. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS CAT instruments can be efficiently administered during routine clinical visits and correlations values found validate the utility when compared to ODI.
BACKGROUND: The inefficiency associated with collecting standard validated instruments has been a barrier to routine use. We utilized computer adaptive testing (CAT) instruments available through Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and correlated these with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHODS: All measurements were collected at a routine chiropractic visit. The ODI assessment was used for comparison as a widely used patient reported outcomes instrument. RESULTS: The average time to complete all questions during an office visit was 170 ± 67 s (average ± Stdev) to answer 25 ± 6 questions. Regression analysis revealed a good linear fit between ODI and both PROMIS pain behavior and physical function with R2 values of 0.5219 and 0.6754 respectively, and a good linear fit between anxiety and depression with R2 values of 0.5236. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS CAT instruments can be efficiently administered during routine clinical visits and correlations values found validate the utility when compared to ODI.
Authors: Rabih Nayfe; Matthieu Chansard; Linda S Hynan; Eric M Mortensen; Thiru Annaswamy; Liana Fraenkel; Una E Makris Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Xiaodan Tang; Benjamin D Schalet; Man Hung; Darrel S Brodke; Charles L Saltzman; David Cella Journal: Spine J Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.297
Authors: Ron D Hays; Zacariah K Shannon; Cynthia R Long; Karen L Spritzer; Robert D Vining; Ian D Coulter; Katherine A Pohlman; Joan A Walter; Christine M Goertz Journal: Pain Med Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 3.637