Literature DB >> 29705287

A population-based audit of surgical practice and outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservations in Scotland - An analysis of 589 patients.

Laszlo Romics1, E Jane Macaskill2, Teresa Fernandez3, Louise Simpson4, Elizabeth Morrow5, Vassilis Pitsinis2, Sian Tovey6, Matthew Barber7, Yazan Masannat4, Sheila Stallard8, Eva Weiler-Mithoff9, Andrew Malyon9, James Mansell10, Esther J Campbell9, Julie Doughty8, J Michael Dixon7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence for oncoplastic breast conservation (OBC) is based on single institutional series. Therefore, we carried out a population-based audit of OBC practice and outcomes in Scotland.
METHODS: A predefined database of patients treated with OBC was completed retrospectively in all breast units practicing OBC in Scotland.
RESULTS: 589 patients were included from 11 units. Patients were diagnosed between September 2005 and March 2017. High volume units performed a mean of 19.3 OBCs per year vs. low volume units who did 11.1 (p = 0.012). 23 different surgical techniques were used. High volume units offered a wider range of techniques (8-14) than low volume units (3-6) (p = 0.004). OBC was carried out as a joint operation involving a breast and a plastic surgeon in 389 patients. Immediate contralateral symmetrisation rate was significantly higher when OBC was performed as a joint operation (70.7% vs. not joint operations: 29.8%; p < 0.001). The incomplete excision rate was 10.4% and was significantly higher after surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma (18.9%; p = 0.0292), but was significantly lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3%; p = 0.031). 9.2% of patients developed major complications requiring hospital admission. Overall the complication rate was significantly lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.035). The 5 year local recurrence rate was 2.7%, which was higher after OBC for DCIS (8.3%) than invasive ductal cancer (1.6%; p = 0.026). 5-year disease-free survival was 91.7%, overall survival was 93.8%, and cancer-specific survival was 96.1%.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that measured outcomes of OBC in a population-based multi-centre setting can be comparable to the outcomes of large volume single centre series.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast conservation therapy; Breast reconstruction; Breast surgery; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Postoperative complications; Segmental

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29705287     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Pyridoxine 5'-phosphate oxidase is correlated with human breast invasive ductal carcinoma development.

Authors:  Weimin Ren; Wencai Guan; Jinguo Zhang; Fanchen Wang; Guoxiong Xu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Positive or close margins: reoperation rate and second conservative resection or total mastectomy?

Authors:  Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Lambaudie; Marie Bannier; Sandrine Rua; Julien Barrou; Mellie Heinemann; Max Buttarelli; Jeanne Thomassin Piana; Monique Cohen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  A prospective cohort study of the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland.

Authors:  Laszlo Romics; Julie Doughty; Sheila Stallard; James Mansell; Vivienne Blackhall; Alison Lannigan; Suzanne Elgammal; Judith Reid; Marie-Claire McGuigan; Francesca Savioli; Sian Tovey; Dermott Murphy; Iona Reid; Andy Malyon; Jennifer McIlhenny; Christopher Wilson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Lee; Richard M Kwasnicki; Hasaan Khan; Yasmin Grant; Abigail Chan; Angela E E Fanshawe; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

5.  Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data.

Authors:  J Ellbrant; K Gulis; E Plasgård; T Svensjö; P O Bendahl; L Rydén
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 6.  Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.

Authors:  Anna Baranova; Mykola Krasnoselskyi; Volodymyr Starikov; Sergii Kartashov; Igor Zhulkevych; Vadym Vlasenko; Kateryna Oleshko; Olga Bilodid; Marina Sadchikova; Yurii Vinnyk
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-02

Review 7.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Breast Cancer Surgery: Evidence Review and Tool Adaptation.

Authors:  Sima Marzban; Samin Shokravi; Sadegh Abaei; Payam Fattahi; Maryam Karami; Faezeh Tajari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-08

8.  Extreme Oncoplasty: Breast Conservation in Patients with Large, Multifocal, and Multicentric Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Savioli; Subodh Seth; Elizabeth Morrow; Julie Doughty; Sheila Stallard; Andy Malyon; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Factors influencing decisions on contralateral symmetrisation procedure among patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Geok Hoon Lim; Chih Huei Choo; John C Allen; Ruey Pyng Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.331

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.