INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Muscle dysfunction is very common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Muscular strength depletion is a result of numerous hospitalisations and this causes an increase in the symptomatology. Numerous interventions have been used in these patients, but there is no consensus on the best. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two physiotherapy interventions during hospitalisation in COPD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial, we included 39 patients who were randomised into three groups. A control group received standard medical treatment (oxygen therapy and pharmacotherapy), and two groups received, in addition to standard medical treatment, a physiotherapy intervention, one with functional electrostimulation and one with calisthenic exercises. The main variables were the ability to exercise using the Five-time sit-to-stand test as well as the functionality associated with symptomatology, as measured by the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale. RESULTS: After comparing the results, there was a significant improvement in dyspnea on discharge versus admission in all three groups. In addition, we found significant differences in functionality, exercise capacity, and fatigue in both intervention groups, being better in the electrostimulation with calisthenic exercises group than in the functional group. CONCLUSION: An electrostimulation treatment improves the exercise capacity, functionality and fatigue in hospitalised AECOPD patients.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Muscle dysfunction is very common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Muscular strength depletion is a result of numerous hospitalisations and this causes an increase in the symptomatology. Numerous interventions have been used in these patients, but there is no consensus on the best. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two physiotherapy interventions during hospitalisation in COPDpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial, we included 39 patients who were randomised into three groups. A control group received standard medical treatment (oxygen therapy and pharmacotherapy), and two groups received, in addition to standard medical treatment, a physiotherapy intervention, one with functional electrostimulation and one with calisthenic exercises. The main variables were the ability to exercise using the Five-time sit-to-stand test as well as the functionality associated with symptomatology, as measured by the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale. RESULTS: After comparing the results, there was a significant improvement in dyspnea on discharge versus admission in all three groups. In addition, we found significant differences in functionality, exercise capacity, and fatigue in both intervention groups, being better in the electrostimulation with calisthenic exercises group than in the functional group. CONCLUSION: An electrostimulation treatment improves the exercise capacity, functionality and fatigue in hospitalised AECOPD patients.