Sabine Visser1, Mark de Mol2, Kiki Cheung3, Jermo J van Toor4, Nico C van Walree5, Bruno H Stricker6, Brenda L Den Oudsten7, Joachim G J V Aerts2. 1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Inspectorate of Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Inspectorate of Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.stricker@erasmusmc.nl. 7. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Centre of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, the treatment benefits and risks need to be constantly weighed. We explored patient-reported satisfaction with therapy (SWT) and assessed its value in addition to quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter cohort study, patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. They completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) before and during chemotherapy. After the last cycle, patients reported on SWT, expectations of therapy, and feelings about side effects (FSE) using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire. The explained variance (R2) of QoL after treatment by SWT was calculated. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined the association of SWT with patient- and treatment-related variables, FSE, and AEs. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients finished 4 cycles of chemotherapy, 65 of whom completed the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire. Fifty-six patients (86.2%) would probably or definitely decide to undergo the same treatment again, regardless of deterioration or improvement in QoL or a high or low frequency of AEs during chemotherapy. The explained variance of QoL by SWT was greatest for the EORTC QLQ C-30 global health status/QoL scale (R2 = 0.170). Patient age (β = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.82), FSE (β = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.29), and tumor response (β = 7.93; 95% CI (1.64 to 14.22)) were independently associated with SWT. CONCLUSION: SWT could provide important supplementary information in addition to QoL assessments and treatment toxicities. Tumor response, older age, and FSE score were associated with better SWT. These insights could affect decision-making during palliative chemotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, the treatment benefits and risks need to be constantly weighed. We explored patient-reported satisfaction with therapy (SWT) and assessed its value in addition to quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter cohort study, patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. They completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) before and during chemotherapy. After the last cycle, patients reported on SWT, expectations of therapy, and feelings about side effects (FSE) using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire. The explained variance (R2) of QoL after treatment by SWT was calculated. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined the association of SWT with patient- and treatment-related variables, FSE, and AEs. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients finished 4 cycles of chemotherapy, 65 of whom completed the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire. Fifty-six patients (86.2%) would probably or definitely decide to undergo the same treatment again, regardless of deterioration or improvement in QoL or a high or low frequency of AEs during chemotherapy. The explained variance of QoL by SWT was greatest for the EORTC QLQ C-30 global health status/QoL scale (R2 = 0.170). Patient age (β = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.82), FSE (β = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.29), and tumor response (β = 7.93; 95% CI (1.64 to 14.22)) were independently associated with SWT. CONCLUSION: SWT could provide important supplementary information in addition to QoL assessments and treatment toxicities. Tumor response, older age, and FSE score were associated with better SWT. These insights could affect decision-making during palliative chemotherapy.
Authors: R Gal; D Oostinga; H Wessels; J J Verlaan; R Charest-Morin; C G Fisher; H M Verkooijen; A L Versteeg Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Marie A Flannery; Eva Culakova; Beverly E Canin; Luke Peppone; Erika Ramsdale; Supriya G Mohile Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 44.544