Literature DB >> 29704851

Republic of Georgia estimates for prevalence of drug use: Randomized response techniques suggest under-estimation.

Irma Kirtadze1, David Otiashvili2, Mzia Tabatadze3, Irina Vardanashvili3, Lela Sturua4, Tomas Zabransky5, James C Anthony6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validity of responses in surveys is an important research concern, especially in emerging market economies where surveys in the general population are a novelty, and the level of social control is traditionally higher. The Randomized Response Technique (RRT) can be used as a check on response validity when the study aim is to estimate population prevalence of drug experiences and other socially sensitive and/or illegal behaviors. AIM: To apply RRT and to study potential under-reporting of drug use in a nation-scale, population-based general population survey of alcohol and other drug use.
METHODS: For this first-ever household survey on addictive substances for the Country of Georgia, we used the multi-stage probability sampling of 18-to-64-year-old household residents of 111 urban and 49 rural areas. During the interviewer-administered assessments, RRT involved pairing of sensitive and non-sensitive questions about drug experiences.
RESULTS: Based upon the standard household self-report survey estimate, an estimated 17.3% [95% confidence interval, CI: 15.5%, 19.1%] of Georgian household residents have tried cannabis. The corresponding RRT estimate was 29.9% [95% CI: 24.9%, 34.9%]. The RRT estimates for other drugs such as heroin also were larger than the standard self-report estimates. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: We remain unsure about what is the "true" value for prevalence of using illegal psychotropic drugs in the Republic of Georgia study population. Our RRT results suggest that standard non-RRT approaches might produce 'under-estimates' or at best, highly conservative, lower-end estimates.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug use; Randomized response techniques; Self-report; Surveys

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29704851     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  2 in total

1.  Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Randomized Response Approach in Public Health Research: An Empirical Study on the Factors of Illegal Waste Disposal.

Authors:  Andy C Y Chong; Amanda M Y Chu; Mike K P So; Ray S W Chung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The impact of modes of administration on self-reports of offending: evidence from a methodological experiment with university students.

Authors:  Hugo S Gomes; David P Farrington; Marvin D Krohn; Ana Cunha; Julia Jurdi; Bárbara Sousa; Diogo Morgado; Joseph Hoft; Elizabeth Hartsell; Leigh Kassem; Ângela Maia
Journal:  J Exp Criminol       Date:  2022-09-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.