Literature DB >> 29703487

Revisiting occult cancer screening in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Philippe Robin1, Marc Carrier2.   

Abstract

Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first manifestation of an unknown cancer. A recently published individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) reported a prevalence of occult cancer detection of 5.2% (95% CI, 4.1% to 6.5%) over a one-year follow-up period, approximately 50% lower than the previously reported 12-month period prevalence. Although an extensive screening strategy was associated with a 2-fold higher probability of cancer detection at initial screening in the IPDMA, not enough evidence exists yet to support the routine use of these tests in patients with unprovoked VTE. It is likely that a subgroup of patients with unprovoked VTE is at higher risk of occult cancer detection and might benefit from closer clinical surveillance. A newly derived and validated clinical predictive rule seems to be able to stratify patients with unprovoked VTE accordingly to their underlying risk of occult cancer detection. The low incidence of occult cancer detection (<3%) in the low-risk group is reassuring for clinicians. Future studies are required to better define the risks and benefits of an extensive occult cancer screening strategy in high risk patients sub-group with unprovoked VTE. To date, the Scientific and Standardized Committee from the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis suggests that patients with unprovoked VTE should only undergo a limited cancer screening including thorough medical history and physical examination, basic laboratory investigations, chest X-ray as well as age- and gender-specific cancer screening according to national guidelines.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malignancy; Screening; Venous thromboembolism; Venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29703487     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  2 in total

1.  Cancer Screening in Patients with Unprovoked Thromboembolism: How to do it and Who Benefits?

Authors:  Filipa Ferreira; José Pereira; Ana Lynce; José Nunes Marques; Ana Martins
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-10

2.  Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Philip Craven; Ciara Daly; Nisha Sikotra; Tim Clay; Eli Gabbay
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.017

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.