BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess dental antibiotic prescribing trends over time, to quantify the number and types of antibiotics dentists prescribe inappropriately, and to estimate the excess health care costs of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with the use of a large cohort of general dentists in the United States. METHODS: We used a quasi-Poisson regression model to analyze antibiotic prescriptions trends by general dentists between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, with the use of data from Express Scripts Holding Company, a large pharmacy benefits manager. We evaluated antibiotic duration and appropriateness for general dentists. Appropriateness was evaluated by reviewing the antibiotic prescribed and the duration of the prescription. RESULTS: Overall, the number and rate of antibiotic prescriptions prescribed by general dentists remained stable in our cohort. During the 3-year study period, approximately 14% of antibiotic prescriptions were deemed inappropriate, based on the antibiotic prescribed, antibiotic treatment duration, or both indicators. The quasi-Poisson regression model, which adjusted for number of beneficiaries covered, revealed a small but statistically significant decrease in the monthly rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by 0.32% (95% confidence interval, 0.14% to 0.50%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall antibiotic prescribing practices among general dentists in this cohort remained stable over time. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by general dentists decreased slightly over time. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: From these authors' definition of appropriate antibiotic prescription choice and duration, inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions are common (14% of all antibiotic prescriptions) among general dentists. Further analyses with the use of chart review, administrative data sets, or other approaches are needed to better evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices among dentists.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess dental antibiotic prescribing trends over time, to quantify the number and types of antibiotics dentists prescribe inappropriately, and to estimate the excess health care costs of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with the use of a large cohort of general dentists in the United States. METHODS: We used a quasi-Poisson regression model to analyze antibiotic prescriptions trends by general dentists between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, with the use of data from Express Scripts Holding Company, a large pharmacy benefits manager. We evaluated antibiotic duration and appropriateness for general dentists. Appropriateness was evaluated by reviewing the antibiotic prescribed and the duration of the prescription. RESULTS: Overall, the number and rate of antibiotic prescriptions prescribed by general dentists remained stable in our cohort. During the 3-year study period, approximately 14% of antibiotic prescriptions were deemed inappropriate, based on the antibiotic prescribed, antibiotic treatment duration, or both indicators. The quasi-Poisson regression model, which adjusted for number of beneficiaries covered, revealed a small but statistically significant decrease in the monthly rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by 0.32% (95% confidence interval, 0.14% to 0.50%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall antibiotic prescribing practices among general dentists in this cohort remained stable over time. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by general dentists decreased slightly over time. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: From these authors' definition of appropriate antibiotic prescription choice and duration, inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions are common (14% of all antibiotic prescriptions) among general dentists. Further analyses with the use of chart review, administrative data sets, or other approaches are needed to better evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices among dentists.
Authors: R A C Chate; S White; L R O Hale; A P Howat; J Bottomley; J Barnet-Lamb; J Lindsay; T I Davies; J M Heath Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2006-11-25 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Adam L Hersh; Daniel J Shapiro; Monina Bartoces; Eva A Enns; Thomas M File; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Jeffrey S Gerber; David Y Hyun; Jeffrey A Linder; Ruth Lynfield; David J Margolis; Larissa S May; Daniel Merenstein; Joshua P Metlay; Jason G Newland; Jay F Piccirillo; Rebecca M Roberts; Guillermo V Sanchez; Katie J Suda; Ann Thomas; Teri Moser Woo; Rachel M Zetts; Lauri A Hicks Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katie J Suda; Lauri A Hicks; Rebecca M Roberts; Robert J Hunkler; Thomas H Taylor Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Paula Elouafkaoui; Linda Young; Rumana Newlands; Eilidh M Duncan; Andrew Elders; Jan E Clarkson; Craig R Ramsay Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Peter B Lockhart; Martin H Thornhill; Jing Zhao; Larry M Baddour; Gregg H Gilbert; Patrick E McKnight; Casey Stephens; Jean-Luc Mougeot Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Jean-Luc C Mougeot; James M Davis; Jing Zhao; Kathleen A Sullivan; Martin H Thornhill; Patrick E McKnight; Casey Stephens; Peter B Lockhart Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Date: 2020-06-12
Authors: Malavika P Tampi; Lauren Pilcher; Olivia Urquhart; Erinne Kennedy; Kelly K O'Brien; Peter B Lockhart; Elliot Abt; Anita Aminoshariae; Michael J Durkin; Ashraf F Fouad; Prerna Gopal; Benjamin W Hatten; Melanie S Lang; Lauren L Patton; Thomas Paumier; Katie J Suda; Hannah Cho; Alonso Carrasco-Labra Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Michael J Durkin; Qianxi Feng; Katie J Suda; Peter B Lockhart; Martin H Thornhill; Kyle Warren; Kiraat D Munshi; Rochelle R Henderson; Victoria J Fraser Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.634