Literature DB >> 29703125

Two retrievals from a single cue: A bottleneck persists across episodic and semantic memory.

Franziska Orscheschek1, Tilo Strobach1, Torsten Schubert2, Timothy Rickard3.   

Abstract

There is evidence in the literature that two retrievals from long-term memory cannot occur in parallel. To date, however, that work has explored only the case of two retrievals from newly acquired episodic memory. These studies demonstrated a retrieval bottleneck even after dual-retrieval practice. That retrieval bottleneck may be a global property of long-term memory retrieval, or it may apply only to the case of two retrievals from episodic memory. In the current experiments, we explored whether that apparent dual-retrieval bottleneck applies to the case of one retrieval from episodic memory and one retrieval from highly overlearned semantic memory. Across three experiments, subjects learned to retrieve a left or right keypress response form a set of 14 unique word cues (e.g., black-right keypress). In addition, they learned a verbal response which involved retrieving the antonym of the presented cue (e.g., black-"white"). In the dual-retrieval condition, subjects had to retrieve both the keypress response and the antonym word. The results suggest that the retrieval bottleneck is superordinate to specific long-term memory systems and holds across different memory components. In addition, the results support the assumption of a cue-level response chunking account of learned retrieval parallelism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cued retrieval; bottleneck models; chunked retrieval; dual-retrieval practice

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29703125     DOI: 10.1177/1747021818776818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  1 in total

Review 1.  The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.