| Literature DB >> 29703125 |
Franziska Orscheschek1, Tilo Strobach1, Torsten Schubert2, Timothy Rickard3.
Abstract
There is evidence in the literature that two retrievals from long-term memory cannot occur in parallel. To date, however, that work has explored only the case of two retrievals from newly acquired episodic memory. These studies demonstrated a retrieval bottleneck even after dual-retrieval practice. That retrieval bottleneck may be a global property of long-term memory retrieval, or it may apply only to the case of two retrievals from episodic memory. In the current experiments, we explored whether that apparent dual-retrieval bottleneck applies to the case of one retrieval from episodic memory and one retrieval from highly overlearned semantic memory. Across three experiments, subjects learned to retrieve a left or right keypress response form a set of 14 unique word cues (e.g., black-right keypress). In addition, they learned a verbal response which involved retrieving the antonym of the presented cue (e.g., black-"white"). In the dual-retrieval condition, subjects had to retrieve both the keypress response and the antonym word. The results suggest that the retrieval bottleneck is superordinate to specific long-term memory systems and holds across different memory components. In addition, the results support the assumption of a cue-level response chunking account of learned retrieval parallelism.Entities:
Keywords: Cued retrieval; bottleneck models; chunked retrieval; dual-retrieval practice
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29703125 DOI: 10.1177/1747021818776818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) ISSN: 1747-0218 Impact factor: 2.143