Marjolein Helleman1, Lars-Gunnar Lundh2, Sophie I Liljedahl2,3, Daiva Daukantaité2, Sofie Westling3,4. 1. a School of Nursing , Hanze University of Applied Sciences , Groningen , the Netherlands. 2. b Department of Psychology , Lund University , Lund , Sweden. 3. c Department of Clinical Sciences , Lund University , Lund , Sweden. 4. d Clinical Psychiatric Research Center , Region Skane , Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Brief admission (BA) is an adjunctive treatment option for individuals with self-harming behavior, having traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). It is offered alongside outpatient psychotherapy for the purpose of strengthening autonomy, self-reflection and self-care and to increase the likelihood of being able to stay in therapy by avoiding lengthy inpatient hospitalizations. AIMS: To investigate participants' experiences with BA during the pilot phase of the Brief Admission Skåne Randomized Controlled Trial (BASRCT), in order to detect possible strengths and limitations of the intervention and gain knowledge to facilitate implementation of BA at other treatment centers. METHOD: Eight participants randomized to BA were interviewed to obtain their experience of BA, or alternatively their reasons for choosing not to use BA. Thematic analysis was conducted upon their transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Reported as most helpful by the participants was the structure/routines at the ward and the positive attitudes from the staff. However, some individuals reported problems with perceived negative attitudes from the staff administering BA and negative rumination about themselves. The reported reasons to request BA were: preventing urges to self-harm from escalating; ending isolation; preventing longer admissions and forced admission; feelings of emotional exhaustion, and the need for rest and support in re-creating a daily routine. Reasons for not requesting BA were fear of rejection, questioning the method; presumed room shortage; difficulties in deciding whether one's problems are serious enough; experiencing the situation to be too clinically acute. CONCLUSION: The results from this study indicated the importance of repeated staff education on all aspects of BA when it is being newly implemented, as well as the importance of working with attitudes of staff delivering BA. These were the key ingredients in making BA implementation successful. Our findings may be of value to other treatment centers implementing BA for the first time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02985047.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Brief admission (BA) is an adjunctive treatment option for individuals with self-harming behavior, having traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). It is offered alongside outpatient psychotherapy for the purpose of strengthening autonomy, self-reflection and self-care and to increase the likelihood of being able to stay in therapy by avoiding lengthy inpatient hospitalizations. AIMS: To investigate participants' experiences with BA during the pilot phase of the Brief Admission Skåne Randomized Controlled Trial (BASRCT), in order to detect possible strengths and limitations of the intervention and gain knowledge to facilitate implementation of BA at other treatment centers. METHOD: Eight participants randomized to BA were interviewed to obtain their experience of BA, or alternatively their reasons for choosing not to use BA. Thematic analysis was conducted upon their transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Reported as most helpful by the participants was the structure/routines at the ward and the positive attitudes from the staff. However, some individuals reported problems with perceived negative attitudes from the staff administering BA and negative rumination about themselves. The reported reasons to request BA were: preventing urges to self-harm from escalating; ending isolation; preventing longer admissions and forced admission; feelings of emotional exhaustion, and the need for rest and support in re-creating a daily routine. Reasons for not requesting BA were fear of rejection, questioning the method; presumed room shortage; difficulties in deciding whether one's problems are serious enough; experiencing the situation to be too clinically acute. CONCLUSION: The results from this study indicated the importance of repeated staff education on all aspects of BA when it is being newly implemented, as well as the importance of working with attitudes of staff delivering BA. These were the key ingredients in making BA implementation successful. Our findings may be of value to other treatment centers implementing BA for the first time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02985047.
Authors: Rose-Marie Lindkvist; Sofie Westling; Sophia Eberhard; Björn Axel Johansson; Olof Rask; Kajsa Landgren Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joachim Eckerström; Emelie Allenius; Marjolein Helleman; Lena Flyckt; Kent-Inge Perseius; Pernilla Omerov Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Date: 2019-12