Literature DB >> 29702920

Economic Impact of Pneumococcal Protein-D Conjugate Vaccine (PHiD-CV) on the Malaysian National Immunization Programme.

Syed Aljunid1, Namaitijiang Maimaiti2, Zafar Ahmed3, Amrizal Muhammad Nur4, Zaleha Md Isa5, Soraya Azmi6, Saperi Sulong3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing pneumococcal polysaccharide and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) in the National Immunization Programme of Malaysia. This study compared introducing PHiD-CV (10 valent vaccine) with current no vaccination, as well as against the alternative 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13).
METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was adapted using national estimates of disease burden, outcomes of pneumococcal disease, and treatment costs of disease manifestations including pneumonia, acute otitis media, septicemia, and meningitis for a hypothetical birth cohort of 550,000 infants. Clinical information was obtained by review of medical records from four public hospitals in Malaysia from the year 2008 to 2009. Inpatient cost from the four study hospitals was obtained from a diagnostic-related group-based costing system. Outpatient cost was estimated using clinical pathways developed by an expert panel. The perspective assessed was that of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
RESULTS: The estimated disease incidence was 1.2, 3.7, 70, and 6.9 per 100,000 population for meningitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, and acute otitis media, respectively. The Markov model predicted medical costs of Malaysian ringgit (RM) 4.86 billion (US $1.51 billion) in the absence of vaccination. Vaccination with PHiD-CV would be highly cost-effective against no vaccination at RM30,290 (US $7,407) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. On comparing PHiD-CV with PCV13, it was found that PHiD-CV dominates PCV13, with 179 quality-adjusted life-years gained while saving RM35 million (US $10.87 million).
CONCLUSIONS: It is cost-effective to incorporate pneumococcal vaccination in the National Immunization Programme of Malaysia. Our model suggests that PHiD-CV would be more cost saving than PCV13 from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Malaysia.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; Malaysia; PHiD-CV; Streptococcus pneumoniae; cost-effectiveness; nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; pneumococcal protein-D conjugate vaccine

Year:  2014        PMID: 29702920     DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues        ISSN: 2212-1099


  4 in total

Review 1.  Serotype distribution of invasive, non-invasive and carried Streptococcus pneumoniae in Malaysia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alex J J Lister; Cheng Foh Le; Eddy Seong Guan Cheah; Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa; David W Cleary; Stuart C Clarke
Journal:  Pneumonia (Nathan)       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of PPV23 vaccination for the Malaysian Hajj pilgrims.

Authors:  Farhana Aminuddin; Nur Amalina Zaimi; Mohd Shaiful Jefri Mohd Nor Sham Kunusagaran; Mohd Shahri Bahari; Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a universal mass vaccination program with a PHiD-CV 2+1 schedule in Malaysia.

Authors:  Xiao Jun Wang; Ashwini Saha; Xu-Hao Zhang
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-08-22

4.  Estimating the population health and economic impacts of introducing a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Malaysia- an economic evaluation.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Norazah Ahmad; Jerusha Naidoo; Chee Yoong Foo; Callix Wong; Sarah Pugh; Kah Kee Tan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.