William H Majoros1,2, Carson Holt3,4, Michael S Campbell5, Doreen Ware5,6, Mark Yandell3,4, Timothy E Reddy1,2,7. 1. Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Department of Human Genetics, Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah and School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 4. USTAR Center for Genetic Discovery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. 6. USDA ARS NEA Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 7. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
Motivation: Genetic variation that disrupts gene function by altering gene splicing between individuals can substantially influence traits and disease. In those cases, accurately predicting the effects of genetic variation on splicing can be highly valuable for investigating the mechanisms underlying those traits and diseases. While methods have been developed to generate high quality computational predictions of gene structures in reference genomes, the same methods perform poorly when used to predict the potentially deleterious effects of genetic changes that alter gene splicing between individuals. Underlying that discrepancy in predictive ability are the common assumptions by reference gene finding algorithms that genes are conserved, well-formed and produce functional proteins. Results: We describe a probabilistic approach for predicting recent changes to gene structure that may or may not conserve function. The model is applicable to both coding and non-coding genes, and can be trained on existing gene annotations without requiring curated examples of aberrant splicing. We apply this model to the problem of predicting altered splicing patterns in the genomes of individual humans, and we demonstrate that performing gene-structure prediction without relying on conserved coding features is feasible. The model predicts an unexpected abundance of variants that create de novo splice sites, an observation supported by both simulations and empirical data from RNA-seq experiments. While these de novo splice variants are commonly misinterpreted by other tools as coding or non-coding variants of little or no effect, we find that in some cases they can have large effects on splicing activity and protein products and we propose that they may commonly act as cryptic factors in disease. Availability and implementation: The software is available from geneprediction.org/SGRF. Supplementary information: Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.
Motivation: Genetic variation that disrupts gene function by altering gene splicing between individuals can substantially influence traits and disease. In those cases, accurately predicting the effects of genetic variation on splicing can be highly valuable for investigating the mechanisms underlying those traits and diseases. While methods have been developed to generate high quality computational predictions of gene structures in reference genomes, the same methods perform poorly when used to predict the potentially deleterious effects of genetic changes that alter gene splicing between individuals. Underlying that discrepancy in predictive ability are the common assumptions by reference gene finding algorithms that genes are conserved, well-formed and produce functional proteins. Results: We describe a probabilistic approach for predicting recent changes to gene structure that may or may not conserve function. The model is applicable to both coding and non-coding genes, and can be trained on existing gene annotations without requiring curated examples of aberrant splicing. We apply this model to the problem of predicting altered splicing patterns in the genomes of individual humans, and we demonstrate that performing gene-structure prediction without relying on conserved coding features is feasible. The model predicts an unexpected abundance of variants that create de novo splice sites, an observation supported by both simulations and empirical data from RNA-seq experiments. While these de novo splice variants are commonly misinterpreted by other tools as coding or non-coding variants of little or no effect, we find that in some cases they can have large effects on splicing activity and protein products and we propose that they may commonly act as cryptic factors in disease. Availability and implementation: The software is available from geneprediction.org/SGRF. Supplementary information: Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Marta Melé; Pedro G Ferreira; Ferran Reverter; David S DeLuca; Jean Monlong; Michael Sammeth; Taylor R Young; Jakob M Goldmann; Dmitri D Pervouchine; Timothy J Sullivan; Rory Johnson; Ayellet V Segrè; Sarah Djebali; Anastasia Niarchou; Fred A Wright; Tuuli Lappalainen; Miquel Calvo; Gad Getz; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Kristin G Ardlie; Roderic Guigó Journal: Science Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Matthew Mort; Timothy Sterne-Weiler; Biao Li; Edward V Ball; David N Cooper; Predrag Radivojac; Jeremy R Sanford; Sean D Mooney Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tuuli Lappalainen; Michael Sammeth; Marc R Friedländer; Peter A C 't Hoen; Jean Monlong; Manuel A Rivas; Mar Gonzàlez-Porta; Natalja Kurbatova; Thasso Griebel; Pedro G Ferreira; Matthias Barann; Thomas Wieland; Liliana Greger; Maarten van Iterson; Jonas Almlöf; Paolo Ribeca; Irina Pulyakhina; Daniela Esser; Thomas Giger; Andrew Tikhonov; Marc Sultan; Gabrielle Bertier; Daniel G MacArthur; Monkol Lek; Esther Lizano; Henk P J Buermans; Ismael Padioleau; Thomas Schwarzmayr; Olof Karlberg; Halit Ongen; Helena Kilpinen; Sergi Beltran; Marta Gut; Katja Kahlem; Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy; Oliver Stegle; Matti Pirinen; Stephen B Montgomery; Peter Donnelly; Mark I McCarthy; Paul Flicek; Tim M Strom; Hans Lehrach; Stefan Schreiber; Ralf Sudbrak; Angel Carracedo; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Robert Häsler; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Gert-Jan van Ommen; Alvis Brazma; Thomas Meitinger; Philip Rosenstiel; Roderic Guigó; Ivo G Gut; Xavier Estivill; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis Journal: Nature Date: 2013-09-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nicholas Stepankiw; Madhura Raghavan; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Andrew Grimson; Jeffrey A Pleiss Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: William H Majoros; Young-Sook Kim; Alejandro Barrera; Fan Li; Xingyan Wang; Sarah J Cunningham; Graham D Johnson; Cong Guo; William L Lowe; Denise M Scholtens; M Geoffrey Hayes; Timothy E Reddy; Andrew S Allen Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Christine Polte; Daniel Wedemeyer; Kathryn E Oliver; Johannes Wagner; Marcel J C Bijvelds; John Mahoney; Hugo R de Jonge; Eric J Sorscher; Zoya Ignatova Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.969