F Siljehult1, L Ärlestig1, C Eriksson2, S Rantapää-Dahlqvist1. 1. a Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine/Rheumatology , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden. 2. b Department of Clinical Immunology/Clinical Microbiology , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) treatment with infliximab (IFX) may be reduced by the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). This study evaluated drug concentration and the presence of ADAs, relative to response, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with IFX. METHOD: Ninety-four RA patients were consecutively included and assessed for disease activity at baseline, and after 14, and 30 or 52 weeks. Serum IFX concentration and ADAs were analysed using in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. ADA analysis was based on binding to TNF-α-coated plates, with the lower detection limit set at mean + 2 sd of controls. RESULTS: At 14 and 52 weeks, 74.5% of the patients had moderate to good response. Good responders had significantly higher IFX concentrations than moderate and poor responders at 52 weeks (6.6 ± 1.4 µg/mL vs 3.6 ± 1.3 µg/mL and 2.6 ± 1.6 µg/mL, respectively). An IFX concentration ≥4.66 µg/mL at 14 weeks yielded a moderate to good response at 30/52 weeks, with 91.3% specificity and 39.3% sensitivity. Eleven patients dropped out owing to lack of efficacy and eight owing to side effects; three with IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL were ADA positive. At an IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL, 43.8% and 30.1% at 14 and 52 weeks, respectively, were ADA positive. None of the good responders had ADAs. CONCLUSION: One-quarter of patients had an IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL but only 11.7% had ADAs. High IFX concentration was related to a good response, suggesting that the lack of response could be due to a lack of IFX, rather than to the presence of ADAs.
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) treatment with infliximab (IFX) may be reduced by the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). This study evaluated drug concentration and the presence of ADAs, relative to response, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with IFX. METHOD: Ninety-four RApatients were consecutively included and assessed for disease activity at baseline, and after 14, and 30 or 52 weeks. Serum IFX concentration and ADAs were analysed using in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. ADA analysis was based on binding to TNF-α-coated plates, with the lower detection limit set at mean + 2 sd of controls. RESULTS: At 14 and 52 weeks, 74.5% of the patients had moderate to good response. Good responders had significantly higher IFX concentrations than moderate and poor responders at 52 weeks (6.6 ± 1.4 µg/mL vs 3.6 ± 1.3 µg/mL and 2.6 ± 1.6 µg/mL, respectively). An IFX concentration ≥4.66 µg/mL at 14 weeks yielded a moderate to good response at 30/52 weeks, with 91.3% specificity and 39.3% sensitivity. Eleven patients dropped out owing to lack of efficacy and eight owing to side effects; three with IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL were ADA positive. At an IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL, 43.8% and 30.1% at 14 and 52 weeks, respectively, were ADA positive. None of the good responders had ADAs. CONCLUSION: One-quarter of patients had an IFX concentration ≤ 0.5 µg/mL but only 11.7% had ADAs. High IFX concentration was related to a good response, suggesting that the lack of response could be due to a lack of IFX, rather than to the presence of ADAs.
Authors: Charlotte Krieckaert; Borja Hernández-Breijo; Johanna Elin Gehin; Guillaume le Mélédo; Alejandro Balsa; Meghna Jani; Denis Mulleman; Victoria Navarro-Compan; Gertjan Wolbink; John Isaac; Astrid van Tubergen Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-06
Authors: Chang-Hee Suh; Dae Hyun Yoo; Alfredo Berrocal Kasay; Elia Chalouhi El-Khouri; Francisco Fidenci Cons Molina; Pavel Shesternya; Pedro Miranda; Francisco G Medina-Rodriguez; Piotr Wiland; Slawomir Jeka; Jose Chavez-Corrales; Thomas Linde; Pawel Hrycaj; Mauricio Abello-Banfi; Ihor Hospodarskyy; Janusz Jaworski; Mariusz Piotrowski; Marek Brzosko; Marek Krogulec; Sergii Shevchuk; Armando Calvo; Daina Andersone; Won Park; Seung Cheol Shim; Sang Joon Lee; Sung Young Lee Journal: BioDrugs Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 5.807
Authors: Tamara Rodríguez-Prieto; Borja Hernández-Breijo; Miguel A Ortega; Rafael Gómez; Javier Sánchez-Nieves; Luis G Guijarro Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: A Nassar-Sheikh Rashid; D Schonenberg-Meinema; S C Bergkamp; S Bakhlakh; A de Vries; T Rispens; T W Kuijpers; G Wolbink; J M van den Berg Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Maurizio Benucci; Valentina Grossi; Mariangela Manfredi; Arianna Damiani; Maria Infantino; Paolo Moscato; Luigi Cinquanta; Elisa Gremese; Barbara Tolusso; Luca Petricca; Anna Laura Fedele; Stefano Alivernini; Fabiola Atzeni; Giovanni Minisola; Roberto Verna Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.464