Literature DB >> 29700476

Quality of life, burden and satisfaction with care in caregivers of patients with a spinal cord injury during and after rehabilitation.

Annemiek Petronella Maria Backx1, Annemie Irene Frans Spooren2,3, Helena Maria Henrika Bongers-Janssen4,5, Hanneke Bouwsema6,7.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the course that burden, quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with care taken in Dutch caregivers of patients with a SCI.
SETTING: Adelante Rehabilitation Centre and Dutch community, the Netherlands
METHODS: Caregiver Strain index (CSI), Short Form36 (SF-36) and Caregivers' Satisfaction with (Stroke) Care Questionnaire (C-SASC) were administered to caregivers (n = 37) of patients with a recently acquired SCI at the start of rehabilitation (T1), discharge from rehabilitation (T2) and at 8 weeks (T3), 6 months (T4) and 18 months after discharge (T5).
RESULTS: During rehabilitation, 20 caregivers (54%) experienced high levels of burden (cutoff >6). CSI scores significantly decreased during follow-up (median CSI score T1:7 IQR[5,10], T5:4 IQR[1,7], p = 0.010), at T5 5 caregivers (24%) scored >6 on burden. Initial low scores on QoL improved significantly in the SF-36 domains 'social-functioning', 'emotional-role-functioning', 'mental health' and 'vitality'. Overall satisfaction with care of caregivers was good (C-SASC: median 3, IQR[3,4]) and stable over time. Moderate strongly negative correlations were found between total CSI-score and 'social-functioning' (T2-T3-T4), 'emotional-role-functioning' (all time points), 'mental health' (all time points) and 'vitality' (all time points) with p values < 0.041.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the high burden and a low QoL on the 'the Mental Health Component' domains (or MHC) of caregivers during inpatient rehabilitation. During the early home phase, we found a significant improvement in burden and MHC. Clinicians working with both SCI-patients and caregivers should be aware of the possible high burden and low QoL of caregivers during rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700476     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-018-0098-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  23 in total

Review 1.  Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review.

Authors:  J M Anne Visser-Meily; Marcel W M Post; Ingrid I Riphagen; Eline Lindeman
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Spouses of spinal cord injury survivors: the added impact of caregiving.

Authors:  D A Weitzenkamp; K A Gerhart; S W Charlifue; G G Whiteneck; G Savic
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Reproducibility of the Caregiver Strain Index and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment in partners of stroke patients living in the Dutch community.

Authors:  Marcel W M Post; Helma Festen; Ingrid G van de Port; Johanna M A Visser-Meily
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 4.  Caregiving services in spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E M Smith; N Boucher; W C Miller
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Improving the quality of life of caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard Schulz; Sara J Czaja; Amy Lustig; Bozena Zdaniuk; Lynn M Martire; Dolores Perdomo
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2009-02

6.  Psychological distress, quality of life, and burden in caregivers during community reintegration after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  James W Middleton; Grahame K Simpson; Annelies De Wolf; Ruth Quirk; Joseph Descallar; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Home aids and personal assistance 10-45 years after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Biering-Sørensen; R B Hansen; F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  For better and for worse: Quality of life impaired in HF patients as well as in their partners.

Authors:  Marie Louise Luttik; Tiny Jaarsma; Nic J G M Veeger; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  Validation of the caregivers' satisfaction with Stroke Care Questionnaire: C-SASC hospital scale.

Authors:  Jane M Cramm; Mathilde M H Strating; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures.

Authors:  Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan; Deborah H Glueck; Keith E Muller
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Psychological and Physical Secondary Conditions and Family Caregiver Burden in Spinal Cord Injury: A Correlational Study.

Authors:  Alessio Conti; Marco Clari; Maeve Nolan; Eva Wallace; Marco Tommasini; Silvia Mozzone; Sara Campagna
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

2.  A Qualitative Study of Caregiving for Adolescents and Young Adults With Spinal Cord Injuries: Lessons From Lived Experiences.

Authors:  Carol Haywood; Elizabeth Pyatak; Natalie Leland; Benjamin Henwood; Mary C Lawlor
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

3.  Is caregiver quality of life predicted by their perceived burden? A cross-sectional study of family caregivers of people with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Alessio Conti; Fulvio Ricceri; Giorgio Scivoletto; Marco Clari; Sara Campagna
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Quantitative assessment-based nursing intervention improves bowel function in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Qionghua Yin; Can Wang; Jianhong Yu; Qiufang Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Intramuscular tetanus neurotoxin reverses muscle atrophy: a randomized controlled trial in dogs with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anna Kutschenko; Anja Manig; Angelika Mönnich; Beatrice Bryl; Cécile-Simone Alexander; Martin Deutschland; Stefan Hesse; David Liebetanz
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Cell and Functional Biomaterial Treatment for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Tianyi Liu; Wenhao Zhu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Chuan He; Xiaolong Liu; Qiang Xin; Kexin Chen; Haifeng Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  The experiences of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and their family during post-injury care in non-specialised and specialised units in UK.

Authors:  Jackie McRae; Christina Smith; Anton Emmanuel; Suzanne Beeke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Indicators of Quality of Care in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sepehr Khosravi; Amirmahdi Khayyamfar; Milad Shemshadi; Masoud Pourghahramani Koltapeh; Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini; Zahra Ghodsi; Farhad Shokraneh; Mohadeseh Sarbaz Bardsiri; Pegah Derakhshan; Khalil Komlakh; Alex R Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings; James D Guest; Vanessa Noonan; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-25

9.  The Caregiver Experience After Stroke in a COVID-19 Environment: A Qualitative Study in Inpatient Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rachel Sutter-Leve; Emily Passint; Debra Ness; Aaron Rindflesch
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.