| Literature DB >> 29700334 |
Yongtai Yin1,2, Liangxing Guo1, Kang Chen1, Zhenyi Guo1, Hongbo Chao1, Baoshan Wang3, Maoteng Li4,5.
Abstract
Rapeseed is one of the most important and widely cultured oilseed crops for food and nonfood purposes worldwide. Neutral lipids are stored in lipid droplets (LDs) as fuel for germination and subsequent seedling growth. Most of the LD detection in seeds was still in 2D levels, and some of the details might have been lost in previous studies. In the present work, the configuration of LDs in seeds was obtained by confocal imaging combined with 3D reconstruction technology in Brassica napus. The size and shape of LDs, LD numbers, cell interval spaces and cell size were observed and compared at 3D levels in the seeds of different materials with high and low oil content. It was also revealed that different cells located in the same tissue exhibited various oil contents according to the construction at the 3D level, which was not previously reported in B. napus. The present work provides a new way to understand the differential in cell populations and enhance the seed oil content at the single cell level within seeds.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29700334 PMCID: PMC5920073 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24812-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1General workflow for LD 3D reconstruction in B. napus seed. OC, Outer Cotyledons. Seeds of B. napus were prefixed and dissected to obtain outer cotyledons. The central part of the OC was cut into slices and stained with Nile Red to acquire stacks of LD images by confocal microscopy. The image stacks were computed by the AMIRA program via 3D rending and reconstruction. The images shown in the workflow figure were acquired by stereomicroscope and confocal imaging and combined into a single image by Adobe Photoshop software.
Figure 2LDs and cell segmentation in 3D level. (a) LD segmentation in a single cell; All the LDs in a single cell were segmented by selecting all the LDs voxels as one same label (yellow color) in order to calculate the total volume of LDs in a single cell. (b) Single LD segmentation inside the cell; Individual LDs was segmented by selecting individual LDs voxels as different labels (LDs possessed different colors of from each other) in order to calculate individual volume and number of LDs in the cell. (c) Cell configuration segmentation; Cell profiles were segmented by selecting cell boundary voxels with the same label (green color) in order to calculate cell volume. Bar represents 20 μm in (a–d) LD segmentation in the total scanning field of high oil content; different colors represent LDs in different cells. (e) LD segmentation in the total scanning field of low oil content cells. Different colors represent LDs in different cells. Bar represents 50 μm in (d,e).
Figure 3Morphological characteristics of LDs show differences between HO and LO lines. To evaluate the lipid distribution in cotyledons and single cells, the volume of total LDs (VTLDs) and single cells (VSC), as well as the total volume of scanning field (VTSF), was calculated by the AMIRA program; (a) VTLD/VTSF value in HO and LO lines; The values of VTLDs/VTSF in HO1, HO2 and HO3 were 12 ± 0.60%, 16.75 ± 1.17%, and 14.44 ± 1.30%, respectively. LO1, LO2 and LO3 were 9.26 ± 0.28%, 10.05 ± 0.80%, and 7.33 ± 0.51%, respectively (n = 10). (b) VLD/VSC value in HO and LO lines; Intervals between cells were measured according to the reconstructed cell configuration in 3D level; The values of VLDs/VSC in HO1, HO2, HO3 were 19.17 ± 1.66%, 22.23 ± 1.00%, and 19.22 ± 1.21%, respectively. LO1, LO2, LO3 were 13.15 ± 1.23%, 16.36 ± 1.12%, and 13.55 ± 1.17%, respectively (n = 26). (c) CS value in HO and LO; the values of CS in HO1, HO2 and HO3 were 4.10 ± 0.57, 3.40 ± 0.49 and 4.46 ± 0.67 μm, respectively. LO1, LO2 and LO3 were 5.58 ± 0.76, 5.91 ± 0.92 and 6.15 ± 0.80 μm, respectively (n = 10). (d) Total numbers of LDs per cell in HO and LO cells; the values of TNLDs per cell in HO1, HO2 and HO3 were 77 ± 6.16, 124 ± 7.44, and 95 ± 3.80, respectively. LO1, LO2 and LO3 were 48 ± 2.88, 29 ± 2.03, and 31 ± 3.1, respectively (n = 10). Values are means ± SD of measurements from HO and LO lines.
Figure 4VLD/VSC values in single cells in HO-1 and LO-1 lines. The VLD/VSC values in 30 individual adjacent cells in HO-1 and LO-1 were analyzed and showed that the lipid storage was different among neighboring cells even though they were located in the same tissue. VLDs, volume of LDs in single cells; VSC, volume of single cells; The VLD and VSC values were calculated by the AMIRA program. Values are means ± SD of measurements on VLD/VSC from HO and LO lines (n = 5).
Figure 5Measurement of cell space in HO and LO line seeds. Intervals between cells were measured according to the reconstructed cell configuration in 3D level; (a,b) cell space measurement in HO-1 and LO-1 lines; rectangle areas were magnified. LDs in HO and LO line seeds were reconstructed, and the space between LDs in each cell was measured according to the AMIRA 3D measurement tool. Bar represents 50 μm.
Figure 6LD size and amounts per cell in LO and HO lines. Total size and amounts of LDs in each line were counted according to the segmentation of single LDs at the 3D level; A box plot and a kernel density plot were generated as violin plots for different groups. The high oil content lines (HO) were 09QT181 (HO-1), 14356 (HO-2) and 09QT328 (HO-3). The low oil content lines (LO) were 09QT50 (LO-1), 09QT145 (LO-2) and 09QT347 (LO-3).