Literature DB >> 29700200

External Validation of the PediBIRN Clinical Prediction Rule for Abusive Head Trauma.

Helena Pfeiffer1,2, Anne Smith2,3, Alison Mary Kemp4, Laura Elizabeth Cowley4, John A Cheek1,2,5, Stuart R Dalziel6,7, Meredith L Borland8,9,10, Sharon O'Brien8, Megan Bonisch6, Jocelyn Neutze11, Ed Oakley1,2,12, Louise Crowe2, Stephen J C Hearps2, Mark D Lyttle2,13,14, Silvia Bressan2,15, Franz E Babl16,2,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A 4-variable abusive head trauma (AHT) clinical prediction rule (CPR) for use in the PICU was derived and validated for children <3 years of age by the Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network (PediBIRN). We aimed to externally validate PediBIRN as designed (PICU only) as well as using broader inclusion criteria (admitted children with head injuries).
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study of pediatric head injuries at 5 Australian and New Zealand tertiary pediatric centers. Possible AHT was identified by clinician suspicion, epidemiology codes, or a high-risk group (<3 years of age, admitted, abnormal neuroimaging results). At 1 center, we additionally reviewed head injuries in the forensic database. We designated patients as positive for AHT, negative for AHT, or having indeterminate outcome after multidisciplinary review and applied the PediBIRN CPR, blinded to outcome, to PICU admissions only, and any head injury admissions. CPR accuracy was calculated by using 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were admitted with abnormal neuroimaging results. Twenty-eight (20%) were positive for AHT, 94 (67%) were negative for AHT, and 19 (13%) had indeterminate outcome. Excluding indeterminate cases, in the PICU (n = 28), the CPR was 100% (75%-100%) sensitive and 11% (0%-48%) specific; in all admitted patients (n = 141), sensitivity was 96% (82%-100%) and specificity of 43% (32%-53%).
CONCLUSIONS: This validation revealed high sensitivity and low specificity for PICU patients. Specificity was improved but moderate in a broader group of admitted head injury patients.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700200     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-3674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  4 in total

1.  Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Wouter Karst; Mark Marinello; Bruce E Herman; Terra N Frazier; Christopher L Carroll; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Matthew Musick; Kerri Weeks; Suzanne B Haney; Afshin Pashai; Ming Wang
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2022-01-22

2.  External Validation of the PediBIRN Screening Tool for Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Emergency Department Settings.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Amanda K Fingarson; Mary Clyde Pierce; Kim Kaczor; Kathi L Makoroff; Ming Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.602

3.  A Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Intensive Care Settings.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Matthew Musick; Mark Marinello; Bruce E Herman; Kerri Weeks; Suzanne B Haney; Terra N Frazier; Christopher L Carroll; Natalie N Kissoon; Reena Isaac; Robin Foster; Kristine A Campbell; Kelly S Tieves; Nina Livingston; Ashley Bucher; Maria C Woosley; Dorinda Escamilla-Padilla; Nancy Jaimon; Lucinda Kustka; Ming Wang; Vernon M Chinchilli; Mark S Dias; Jennie Noll
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.314

Review 4.  Advances and Future Directions of Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A M Iqbal O'Meara; Jake Sequeira; Nikki Miller Ferguson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.