Literature DB >> 29700058

Impact of Female Sex on Clinical Outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE Trial of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Karl-Heinz Kuck1, Josep Brugada2, Alexander Fürnkranz3,4, K R Julian Chun3, Andreas Metzner5, Feifan Ouyang5, Michael Schlüter5, Arif Elvan6, Kendra M Braegelmann7, Fred J Kueffer7, Thomas Arentz8, Jean-Paul Albenque9, Michael Kühne10, Christian Sticherling10, Claudio Tondo11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. We sought to assess the association of baseline covariates with clinical outcomes in the 750 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF enrolled in FIRE AND ICE.
METHODS: In a 2-part analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were first used to identify baseline patient characteristics predictive of catheter ablation efficacy determined by the clinical end points of (1) atrial arrhythmia recurrence (primary efficacy failure), (2) cardiovascular rehospitalization, and (3) repeat ablation. Propensity score stratification methods were then used to account for differences in baseline characteristics between sexes.
RESULTS: Female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.73; P=0.010) and prior direct current cardioversion (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.07-1.82; P=0.013) were independently associated with atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Female sex (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80; P=0.035) and hypertension (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-2.00; P=0.013) independently predicted cardiovascular rehospitalization. A longer history of AF (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P=0.039) increased the rate of repeat ablation. Women continued to have higher rates of primary efficacy failure and cardiovascular rehospitalization after propensity score adjustment, with adjusted HRs of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.16-2.18; P<0.05) and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.15-2.17; P<0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, female sex was associated with an almost 40% increase in the risks of primary efficacy failure and cardiovascular rehospitalization. Primary efficacy failure was also adversely impacted by a history of direct current cardioversion, whereas hypertension had a negative impact on cardiovascular rehospitalization. History of AF was the only predictor of repeat ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01490814.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; humans; risk; sex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700058     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  20 in total

1.  Sex-based differences in outcomes, 30-day readmissions, and costs following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010-14.

Authors:  Jim W Cheung; Edward P Cheng; Xian Wu; Ilhwan Yeo; Paul J Christos; Hooman Kamel; Steven M Markowitz; Christopher F Liu; George Thomas; James E Ip; Bruce B Lerman; Luke K Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Sex effect on efficacy of pulmonary vein cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the multicenter real-world 1STOP project.

Authors:  Danilo Ricciardi; Giuseppe Arena; Roberto Verlato; Saverio Iacopino; Paolo Pieragnoli; Giulio Molon; Massimiliano Manfrin; Giuseppe Allocca; Giuseppe Cattafi; Giusy Sirico; Giovanni Rovaris; Luigi Sciarra; Daniele Nicolis; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Update on Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women.

Authors:  Fabiana Lucà; Maurizio Giuseppe Abrignani; Iris Parrini; Stefania Angela Di Fusco; Simona Giubilato; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Laura Piccioni; Laura Cipolletta; Bruno Passaretti; Francesco Giallauria; Angelo Leone; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Carmine Riccio; Sandro Gelsomino; Furio Colivicchi; Michele Massimo Gulizia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Sex Differences in Epicardial Adipose Tissue: Association With Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes.

Authors:  Jing Zhu; Kaimin Zhuo; Bo Zhang; Zhen Xie; Wenjia Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Predictors of non-pulmonary vein foci in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Keita Watanabe; Junichi Nitta; Osamu Inaba; Akira Sato; Yukihiro Inamura; Nobutaka Kato; Masahito Suzuki; Masahiko Goya; Kenzo Hirao; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with systolic heart failure: pathophysiology mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Ioanna Koniari; Eleni Artopoulou; Dimitrios Velissaris; Nicholas Kounis; Grigorios Tsigkas
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Left ventricular fibrosis by extracellular volume fraction and the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.

Authors:  Songnan Li; Lei Zhao; Xiaohai Ma; Rong Bai; Jie Tian; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-12

8.  Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from the Veterans Healthcare System.

Authors:  Waddah Maskoun; Amjad Abualsuod; Fuad Habash; Mohammed E Madmani; Khaldia Khaled; Zaid Gheith; Bilal Alqam; John M Miller; Srikanth Vallurupalli
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Association Between Sex and Treatment Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Versus Drug Therapy: Results From the CABANA Trial.

Authors:  Andrea M Russo; Emily P Zeitler; Anna Giczewska; Adam P Silverstein; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Yong-Mei Cha; Kristi H Monahan; Tristram D Bahnson; Daniel B Mark; Douglas L Packer; Jeanne E Poole
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Women and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.