Literature DB >> 29699926

[Spanish Society of Hypertension position statement on the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines].

T Gijón-Conde1, M Gorostidi2, M Camafort3, M Abad-Cardiel4, E Martín-Rioboo5, F Morales-Olivas6, E Vinyoles7, P Armario8, J R Banegas9, A Coca3, A de la Sierra10, N Martell-Claros4, J Redón11, L M Ruilope12, J Segura13.   

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have recently published their guidelines for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of hypertension in adults. The most controversial issue is the classification threshold at 130/80mmHg, which will allow a large number of patients to be diagnosed as hypertensive who were previously considered normotensive. Blood pressure (BP) is considered normal (<120mmHg systolic and <80mmHg diastolic), elevated (120-129 and <80mmHg), stage 1 (130-139 or 80-89mmHg), and stage 2 (≥140 or ≥90mmHg). Out-of-office BP measurements are recommended to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension and for titration of BP-lowering medication. In management, cardiovascular risk would be determinant since those with grade 1 hypertension and an estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ≥10%, and those with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes will require pharmacological treatment, the rest being susceptible to non-pharmacological treatment up to the 140/90mmHg threshold. These recommendations would allow patients with level 1 hypertension and high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to benefit from pharmacological therapies and all patients could also benefit from improved non-pharmacological therapies. However, this approach should be cautious because inadequate BP measurement and/or lack of systematic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculation could lead to overestimation in diagnosing hypertension and to overtreatment. Guidelines are recommendations, not impositions, and the management of hypertension should be individualized, based on clinical decisions, preferences of the patients, and an adequate balance between benefits and risks.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular risk; Enfermedad cardiovascular; Guidelines; Guías clínicas; Hipertensión arterial; Hypertension; Presión arterial; Riesgo cardiovascular

Year:  2018        PMID: 29699926     DOI: 10.1016/j.hipert.2018.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hipertens Riesgo Vasc        ISSN: 1889-1837


  3 in total

1.  [Optimizing blood pressure control through telemedicine in Primary Care in Spain (Iniciativa Óptima): Results from a Delphi study].

Authors:  Carmen Sánchez Peinador; Joan Torras Borrell; María José Castillo Moraga; María Isabel Egocheaga Cabello; Xiana Rodríguez Villalón; Miguel Turégano Yedro; Javier Gamarra Ortiz; Manuel Domínguez Sardiña; Vicente Pallarés Carratalá
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.206

2.  Intrasession Reliability Analysis for Oscillometric Blood Pressure Method Using a Digital Blood Pressure Monitor in Peruvian Population.

Authors:  Sabina Barrios-Fernandez; Eduardo Manuel Sosa-Sánchez; Jorge Carlos-Vivas; Laura Muñoz-Bermejo; Jesús Morenas-Martín; María Dolores Apolo-Arenas; Jose Carmelo Adsuar; Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

3.  Sex Differences in Clinical Parameters, Pharmacological and Health-Resource Utilization in a Population With Hypertension Without a Diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ana Lear-Claveras; Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez; Ana Clavería; Sabela Couso-Viana; Jesús Puente-Comesaña; Rosa Magallón Botaya
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.100

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.