Literature DB >> 29699838

Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder: Results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series.

Giuseppe Simone1, Gabriele Tuderti2, Leonardo Misuraca2, Umberto Anceschi2, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero2, Francesco Minisola2, Salvatore Guaglianone2, Michele Gallucci2.   

Abstract

AIM: In this study, we compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes of patients treated with either open or robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder at a tertiary care center.
METHODS: The institutional prospective bladder cancer database was queried for "cystectomy with curative intent" and "neobladder". All patients underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder or open radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer or muscle invasive bladder cancer with a follow-up length ≥2 years were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was used. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to compare oncologic outcomes of selected cohorts. Survival rates were computed at 1,2,3 and 4 years after surgery and the log rank test was applied to assess statistical significance between the matched groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 363 patients (299 open and 64 robotic) were included. Open radical cystectomy patients were more frequently male (p = 0.08), with higher pT stages (p = 0.003), lower incidence of urothelial histologies (p = 0.05) and lesser adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (<0.001). After applying the propensity score matching, 64 robot-assisted radical cystectomy patients were matched with 46 open radical cystectomy cases (all p ≥ 0.22). Open cohort showed a higher rate of perioperative overall complications (91.3% vs 42.2%, p 0.001). At Kaplan-Meier analysis robotic and open cohorts displayed comparable disease-free survival (log-rank p = 0.746), cancer-specific survival (p = 0.753) and overall-survival rates (p = 0.909).
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder provides comparable oncologic outcomes of open radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder at intermediate term survival analysis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracorporeal; Neobladder; Outcomes; Propensity score matching; Radical cystectomy; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29699838     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  17 in total

1.  Intra-corporeal robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative and long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns.

Authors:  Kenji Zennami; Makoto Sumitomo; Kiyoshi Takahara; Takuhisa Nukaya; Masashi Takenaka; Kosuke Fukaya; Manabu Ichino; Naohiko Fukami; Hitomi Sasaki; Mamoru Kusaka; Ryoichi Shiroki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases.

Authors:  Keiran D Clement; Emily Pearce; Ahmed H Gabr; Bhavan P Rai; Abdulla Al-Ansari; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Are we really seeking for equivalence?-The virtue of the robot is in technology.

Authors:  Aldo Brassetti; Riccardo Mastroianni; Giuseppe Simone
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

4.  Development and Validation of a Model for Predicting Urethral Recurrence in Male Patients with Muscular Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy Combined with Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Zeqi Liu; Xuanyu Zhang; Bin Wu; Yueyang Zhao; Song Bai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  Robotic assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a review of what we do and don't know.

Authors:  Zeynep G Gul; Andrew B Katims; Jared S Winoker; Peter Wiklund; Nikhil Waingankar; Reza Mehrazin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 6.  Utility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Kazuhide Makiyama; Toru Shimazui; Tomoaki Miyagawa; Kosuke Mizutani; Tomohiro Tsuchiya; Taku Kato; Keita Nakane
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 7.  Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shoji Kimura; Takehiro Iwata; Beat Foerster; Nicola Fossati; Alberto Briganti; Yasutomo Nasu; Shin Egawa; Mohammad Abufaraj; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 8.  Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction: Patient Selection And Perspectives.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 9.  Totally intracorporeal robot-assisted urinary diversion for bladder cancer (part 2). Review and detailed characterization of the existing intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder.

Authors:  Hugo Otaola-Arca; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat; Vipul R Patel; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Marcelo Orvieto
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-08

10.  Does robotic radical cystectomy impede oncological outcome in bladder cancer patients?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.