Literature DB >> 29699781

Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: A review of literature with metanalysis.

M Milone1, N Velotti2, M Manigrasso2, P Anoldo2, F Milone2, G D De Palma2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common chronic inflammation of the natal cleft and presents as an abscess or a chronically discharging, painful sinus tract. The management of chronic PSD is variable, contentious, and problematic. Although many surgical procedures have been tried, the best surgical method remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis of literature is to provide surgeons an objective instrument of decision through an analysis of recurrence rate of various surgical techniques in a long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed to identify all available studies. According to the pre-specified protocol, all studies reporting a surgical approach to PSD with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis. The number of patients varied from 50 to 1165 with a mean follow-up from 58.36 to 240 months. The overall incidence of recurrence was of 0.138; the resulting incidence of open healing, midline closure and out-midline closure were of 17.9%, 16.8% and 10% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Interestingly, our data reveal a rate of relapsing disease higher than the one defined in previous studies both for the overall PSD and for each surgical procedure. A long-term follow-up of at least 5 years, should be considered the gold standard in pilonidal sinus surgery benchmarking. From our results, we can state that open healing and midline closure should not be considered effective for their high frequency of relapse disease and midline primary closure should be preferred.
Copyright © 2018 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow up; Long-term; Pilonidal sinus; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29699781     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  13 in total

1.  A minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results.

Authors:  N Foti; D Passannanti; A Libia; F C Campanile
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Fibrin glue is a quick and effective treatment for primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  T S Sian; P J J Herrod; J E M Blackwell; E J O Hardy; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) versus sinusectomy for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Nunzio Velotti; Michele Manigrasso; Francesco Milone; Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-12-12

4.  Authors' reply to: "The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear".

Authors:  L Basso; G Gallo; M Milone; R Pietroletti
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  A mapping review of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  M Kumar; W H Clay; M J Lee; S R Brown; D Hind
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Early versus delayed endoscopic treatment of acute pilonidal abscess: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Michele Manigrasso; Nunzio Velotti; Loredana M Sosa Fernandez; Sara Vertaldi; Francesco Maione; Nicola Gennarelli; Pietro Schettino; Mario Musella; Giovanni D De Palma; Marco Milone
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Nunzio Velotti; Michele Manigrasso; Katia Di Lauro; Enrico Araimo; Federica Calculli; Sara Vertaldi; Pietro Anoldo; Giovanni Aprea; Giuseppe De Simone; Antonio Vitiello; Mario Musella; Marco Milone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Francesco Milone; Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-08-07

8.  The Correlation Between Delayed Surgical Therapy After the Diagnosis of Pilonidal Sinus Disease and Relapse, Labor Loss, and Costs.

Authors:  Turgay Karatas; Murat Kanlioz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-28

9.  Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: State of Art and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michele Manigrasso; Pietro Anoldo; Grazia Cantore; Alessia Chini; Anna D'Amore; Nicola Gennarelli; Francesco Maione; Alessandra Marello; Pietro Schettino; Carmen Sorrentino; Sara Vertaldi; Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Marco Milone
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-04

10.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  R Perinotti; G Gallo; M Milone; L Basso; M Manigrasso; R Pietroletti; A Bondurri; M La Torre; G Milito; M Pozzo; D Segre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.