Literature DB >> 29699305

The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer.

Rikikazu Sugiyama1, Koji Nakagawa1, Yayoi Nishi1, Rie Sugiyama1, Kei Ezaki1, Masato Inoue1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that contribute to the decision to choose single embryo transfer (SET).
METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients who underwent ART treatment in our clinics between April 2006 and May 2007 were enrolled in this study. All patients had elected to undergo SET before the start of each treatment cycle; a questionnaire was administered to all patients prior to the SET procedure.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 34.6 years old (range: 24-45 years). The mean number of redundant embryos was 3.7 (range: 1-17), and the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 25.7%. A total of 121 patients (57.9%) who underwent SET returned their questionnaires. Based on the results of questionnaire, 56.2% of patients who received SET waived their right to choose between single and double embryo transfer. Among patients who selected SET, 67.6% believed that the pregnancy rate resulting from double embryo transfer (DET) is significantly greater than that associated with SET, and 25% of patients wanted to have twins. The majority of patients (80.9%) who underwent SET understood that multi-fetal pregnancy increases the risk of complications during gestation and delivery. Among all patients who completed the questionnaire, 72.8% believed that the number of transferred embryos should not be controlled by law.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that greater than one-half of patients who underwent SET were faced with a dilemma--the difficult choice between their own desires and their clinician's recommendation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology (ART); Double embryo transfer (DET); Questionnaire; Single embryo transfer (SET)

Year:  2008        PMID: 29699305      PMCID: PMC5904688          DOI: 10.1007/s12522-008-0006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


  21 in total

1.  Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion.

Authors:  W A Grobman; M P Milad; J Stout; S C Klock
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Effect of activation with Ca ionophore A23187 and puromycin on the development of human oocytes that failed to fertilize after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  K Nakagawa; S Yamano; N Moride; M Yamashita; M Yoshizawa; T Aono
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ann Thurin Kjellberg; Per Carlsson; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Coping strategies and psychological adjustment of couples presenting for IVF.

Authors:  R J Edelmann; K J Connolly; H Bartlett
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  T Bergh; A Ericson; T Hillensjö; K G Nygren; U B Wennerholm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Ann Thurin; Jon Hausken; Torbjörn Hillensjö; Barbara Jablonowska; Anja Pinborg; Annika Strandell; Christina Bergh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Pregnancy rate in relation to number of cleaved eggs replaced after in-vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles monitored by serum levels of oestradiol and progesterone as sole index.

Authors:  H Wramsby; P Sundström; P Liedholm
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Psychiatric morbidity in couples attending a fertility service.

Authors:  D Guerra; A Llobera; A Veiga; P N Barri
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Current status of in-vitro fertilisation and implantation of human embryos.

Authors:  R G Edwards; P C Steptoe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Psychological evaluation and support in a program of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  E W Freeman; A S Boxer; K Rickels; R Tureck; L Mastroianni
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using a mild stimulation protocol combined with clomiphene citrate and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone to determine the optimal number of oocytes needed to achieve pregnancy and reduce the concerns of patients.

Authors:  Rikikazu Sugiyama; Koji Nakagawa; Yayoi Nishi; Yuko Ojiro; Hiroyasu Juen; Rie Sugiyama; Yasushi Kuribayashi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.