Literature DB >> 2969925

Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients.

M Nobuyoshi1, T Kimura, H Nosaka, S Mioka, K Ueno, H Yokoi, N Hamasaki, H Horiuchi, H Ohishi.   

Abstract

To further understand the temporal mode and mechanisms of coronary restenosis, 229 patients were studied by prospective angiographic follow-up on day 1 and at 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Quantitative measurement of coronary stenosis was achieved by cinevideodensitometric analysis. Actuarial restenosis rate was 12.7% at 1 month, 43.0% at 3 months, 49.4% at 6 months and 52.5% at 1 year. In 219 patients followed up for greater than or equal to 3 months, mean stenosis diameter was 1.91 +/- 0.53 mm immediately after coronary angioplasty, 1.72 +/- 0.52 mm on day 1, 1.86 +/- 0.58 mm at 1 month and 1.43 +/- 0.67 mm at 3 months. In 149 patients followed up for greater than or equal to 6 months, mean stenosis diameter was 1.66 +/- 0.58 mm at 3 months and 1.66 +/- 0.62 mm at 6 months. In 73 patients followed up for 1 year, mean stenosis diameter was 1.65 +/- 0.56 mm at 6 months and 1.66 +/- 0.57 mm at 1 year. Thus, stenosis diameter decreased markedly between 1 month and 3 months after coronary angioplasty and reached a plateau thereafter. In conclusion, restenosis is most prevalent between 1 and 3 months and rarely occurs beyond 3 months after coronary angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2969925     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(88)80046-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  66 in total

Review 1.  Photodynamic therapy: shedding light on restenosis.

Authors:  R Mansfield; S Bown; J McEwan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Restenosis following coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  K J Beatt; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1990

3.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a proposal of new comparative approaches based on quantitative angiography.

Authors:  P W Serruys; D P Foley; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-10

Review 4.  Cardiology.

Authors:  L D Smith; D J Coltart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Restenosis after angioplasty.

Authors:  A H Gershlick; D P de Bono
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-12

6.  Risk stratification after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J R Burton; M Haraphongse; L Hsu; C T Kappagoda; R E Rossall; B Schlaut; M P Senaratne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Laser ablation and the need for intra-arterial imaging.

Authors:  C Borst; R Rienks; W P Mali; L van Erven
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1989

8.  Vitamin D attenuates HMGB1-mediated neointimal hyperplasia after percutaneous coronary intervention in swine.

Authors:  Mohan Satish; Palanikumar Gunasekar; Juan A Asensio; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 9.  Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J M Wilson; J J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

10.  Nitric oxide-dependent bone marrow progenitor mobilization by carbon monoxide enhances endothelial repair after vascular injury.

Authors:  Barbara Wegiel; David J Gallo; Kathleen G Raman; Jenny M Karlsson; Brett Ozanich; Beek Y Chin; Edith Tzeng; Shakil Ahmad; Asif Ahmed; Catherine J Baty; Leo E Otterbein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.