Ariane Jacob1, Gregory Moullec2, Kim L Lavoie3, Catherine Laurin4, Tovah Cowan3, Cameron Tisshaw3, Christina Kazazian3, Candace Raddatz3, Simon L Bacon3. 1. Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de- Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal. 2. Research Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal. 3. Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal. 4. Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital du Sacré- Coeur de Montrea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy weight loss (CBTWL) interventions on weight loss, psychological outcomes (eating behaviors [cognitive restraint, emotional/binge eating], and depressive/anxiety symptoms) in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: To be included, studies had to (a) be randomized controlled clinical trials of a CBTWL intervention versus a comparison intervention; (b) include weight loss and psychological outcomes; and (c) include patients who were at least overweight to obese. This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman & the PRISMA Group, 2009). RESULTS: Twelve studies (6,805 participants) were included. The average weight loss difference between arms was -1.70 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.52 to -0.86, I2 = 1%) in favor of CBTWL. The standardized mean difference on cognitive restraint was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.09; I2 = 81%) and -0.32 (95% CI: -0.49 to -0.16; I2 = 0%) for emotional eating in favor of CBTWL. The reduction in depressive symptoms was not statistically different between the groups (-0.10 [95% CI: 0.21 to 0.02], I2 = 36%). Meta-analyses were not possible for anxiety and binge eating. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to weight loss, current evidence suggests that CBTWL is an efficacious therapy for increasing cognitive restraint and reducing emotional eating. However, CBTWL does not seem to be superior to other interventions for decreasing depressive symptoms. Future studies should focus on understanding how psychological factors impact weight loss and management. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy weight loss (CBTWL) interventions on weight loss, psychological outcomes (eating behaviors [cognitive restraint, emotional/binge eating], and depressive/anxiety symptoms) in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: To be included, studies had to (a) be randomized controlled clinical trials of a CBTWL intervention versus a comparison intervention; (b) include weight loss and psychological outcomes; and (c) include patients who were at least overweight to obese. This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman & the PRISMA Group, 2009). RESULTS: Twelve studies (6,805 participants) were included. The average weight loss difference between arms was -1.70 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.52 to -0.86, I2 = 1%) in favor of CBTWL. The standardized mean difference on cognitive restraint was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.09; I2 = 81%) and -0.32 (95% CI: -0.49 to -0.16; I2 = 0%) for emotional eating in favor of CBTWL. The reduction in depressive symptoms was not statistically different between the groups (-0.10 [95% CI: 0.21 to 0.02], I2 = 36%). Meta-analyses were not possible for anxiety and binge eating. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to weight loss, current evidence suggests that CBTWL is an efficacious therapy for increasing cognitive restraint and reducing emotional eating. However, CBTWL does not seem to be superior to other interventions for decreasing depressive symptoms. Future studies should focus on understanding how psychological factors impact weight loss and management. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Vincent Gosselin Boucher; Simon Bacon; Brigitte Voisard; Anda I Dragomir; Claudia Gemme; Florent Larue; Sara Labbé; Geneviève Szczepanik; Kimberly Corace; Tavis Campbell; Michael Vallis; Gary Garber; Codie Rouleau; Jean G Diodati; Doreen Rabi; Serge Sultan; Kim Lavoie Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Rebecca A Jones; Emma R Lawlor; Jack M Birch; Manal I Patel; André O Werneck; Erin Hoare; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen J Sharp; Amy L Ahern Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-10-25 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Idoia Iturbe; Eva Pereda-Pereda; Enrique Echeburúa; Edurne Maiz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Heather Behr; Annabell Suh Ho; Ellen Siobhan Mitchell; Qiuchen Yang; Laura DeLuca; Andreas Michealides Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 3.390