Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez1, Momotazur Rahman1, Dana B Mukamel2, Vincent Mor1,3, Amal N Trivedi1,3. 1. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, iTEQC Research Program, Irvine, CA. 3. Providence VA Medical Center, RI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding and addressing racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities is an important health policy issue, particularly as the Medicare program initiates value-based payments for these institutions. METHODS: Our final cohort included 649,187 Medicare beneficiaries in either the fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage programs, who were 65 and older and were admitted to a skilled nursing facility following an acute hospital stay, from 8,375 skilled nursing facilities. We examined the quality of care in skilled nursing facilities that disproportionately serve minority patients compared to non-Hispanic whites. Three measures, all calculated at the level of the facility, were used to assess quality of care in skilled nursing facilities: (a) 30-day rehospitalization rate; (b) successful discharge from the facility to the community; and (c) Medicare five-star quality ratings. RESULTS: We found that African American post-acute patients are highly concentrated in a small number of institutions, with 28% of facilities accounting for 80% of all post-acute admissions for African American patients. Similarly, just 20% of facilities accounted for 80% of all admissions for Hispanics. Skilled nursing facilities with higher fractions of African American patients had worse performance for three publicly reported quality measures: rehospitalization, successful discharge to the community, and the star rating indicator. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to address disparities should focus attention on institutions that disproportionately serve minority patients and monitor unintended consequences of value-based payments to skilled nursing facilities.
BACKGROUND: Understanding and addressing racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities is an important health policy issue, particularly as the Medicare program initiates value-based payments for these institutions. METHODS: Our final cohort included 649,187 Medicare beneficiaries in either the fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage programs, who were 65 and older and were admitted to a skilled nursing facility following an acute hospital stay, from 8,375 skilled nursing facilities. We examined the quality of care in skilled nursing facilities that disproportionately serve minority patients compared to non-Hispanic whites. Three measures, all calculated at the level of the facility, were used to assess quality of care in skilled nursing facilities: (a) 30-day rehospitalization rate; (b) successful discharge from the facility to the community; and (c) Medicare five-star quality ratings. RESULTS: We found that African American post-acute patients are highly concentrated in a small number of institutions, with 28% of facilities accounting for 80% of all post-acute admissions for African American patients. Similarly, just 20% of facilities accounted for 80% of all admissions for Hispanics. Skilled nursing facilities with higher fractions of African American patients had worse performance for three publicly reported quality measures: rehospitalization, successful discharge to the community, and the star rating indicator. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to address disparities should focus attention on institutions that disproportionately serve minority patients and monitor unintended consequences of value-based payments to skilled nursing facilities.
Authors: Meiling Ying; Helena Temkin-Greener; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Robert G Holloway; Yue Li Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Sheria G Robinson-Lane; Laura Block; Barbara J Bowers; Pamela Z Cacchione; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Amit Kumar; Indrakshi Roy; Amol M Karmarkar; Kimberly S Erler; James L Rudolph; Julie A Baldwin; Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.669