Marlanka A Zuur1, Jotam G Pasipanodya2, Dick van Soolingen3,4, Tjip S van der Werf5, Tawanda Gumbo2, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar1. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 3. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven. 4. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. 5. Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: Bacterial susceptibility is categorized as susceptible, intermediate-susceptible dose-dependent (ISDD), and resistant. The strategy is to use higher doses of first-line agents in the ISDD category, thereby preserving the use of these drugs. This system has not been applied to antituberculosis drugs. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target exposures, in tandem with Monte Carlo experiments, recently identified susceptibility breakpoints of 0.0312 mg/L for isoniazid, 0.0625 mg/L for rifampin, and 50 mg/L for pyrazinamide. These have been confirmed in clinical studies. Methods: Target attainment studies were carried out using Monte Carlo experiments to investigate whether rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide dose increases would achieve the PK/PD target in >90% of 10000 patients with tuberculosis caused by bacteria, revealing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) between the proposed and the traditional breakpoints. Results: We found that an isoniazid dose of 900 mg/day identified a new ISDD MIC range of 0.0312-0.25 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥0.5 mg/L. Rifampin 1800 mg/day would result in an ISDD of 0.0625-0.25 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥0.5 mg/L. At a dose of pyrazinamide 4 g/day, the ISDD MIC range was 37.5-50 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥100 mg/L. Based on MIC distributions, 93% (isoniazid), 78% (rifampin), and 27% (pyrazinamide) of isolates would be within the ISDD range. Conclusions: Drug susceptibility testing at 2 concentrations delineating the ISDD range, and subsequently using higher doses, could prevent switching to a more toxic second-line treatment. Confirmatory clinical studies would provide evidence to change treatment guidelines.
Background: Bacterial susceptibility is categorized as susceptible, intermediate-susceptible dose-dependent (ISDD), and resistant. The strategy is to use higher doses of first-line agents in the ISDD category, thereby preserving the use of these drugs. This system has not been applied to antituberculosis drugs. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target exposures, in tandem with Monte Carlo experiments, recently identified susceptibility breakpoints of 0.0312 mg/L for isoniazid, 0.0625 mg/L for rifampin, and 50 mg/L for pyrazinamide. These have been confirmed in clinical studies. Methods: Target attainment studies were carried out using Monte Carlo experiments to investigate whether rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide dose increases would achieve the PK/PD target in >90% of 10000 patients with tuberculosis caused by bacteria, revealing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) between the proposed and the traditional breakpoints. Results: We found that an isoniazid dose of 900 mg/day identified a new ISDD MIC range of 0.0312-0.25 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥0.5 mg/L. Rifampin 1800 mg/day would result in an ISDD of 0.0625-0.25 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥0.5 mg/L. At a dose of pyrazinamide 4 g/day, the ISDD MIC range was 37.5-50 mg/L and resistance at MIC ≥100 mg/L. Based on MIC distributions, 93% (isoniazid), 78% (rifampin), and 27% (pyrazinamide) of isolates would be within the ISDD range. Conclusions: Drug susceptibility testing at 2 concentrations delineating the ISDD range, and subsequently using higher doses, could prevent switching to a more toxic second-line treatment. Confirmatory clinical studies would provide evidence to change treatment guidelines.
Authors: Devyani Deshpande; Jotam G Pasipanodya; Stellah G Mpagama; Paula Bendet; Shashikant Srivastava; Thearith Koeuth; Pooi S Lee; Sujata M Bhavnani; Paul G Ambrose; Guy Thwaites; Scott K Heysell; Tawanda Gumbo Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kathleen F Walsh; Stalz Charles Vilbrun; Ariadne Souroutzidis; Sobieskye Delva; Guy Joissaint; Laurent Mathurin; Oksana Ocheretina; Pierre Cremieux; Jean William Pape; Serena P Koenig Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tjip S Van Der Werf; Yves T Barogui; Paul J Converse; Richard O Phillips; Ymkje Stienstra Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 4.108
Authors: Gunavanthi D Boorgula; Laxmi U M R Jakkula; Tawanda Gumbo; Bockgie Jung; Shashikant Srivastava Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Stijn W van Beek; Rob Ter Heine; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Cecile Magis-Escurra; Rob E Aarnoutse; Elin M Svensson Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Prakruti S Rao; Christopher C Moore; Amir A Mbonde; Edwin Nuwagira; Patrick Orikiriza; Dan Nyehangane; Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Charles A Peloquin; Jean Gratz; Suporn Pholwat; Rinah Arinaitwe; Yap Boum; Juliet Mwanga-Amumpaire; Eric R Houpt; Leonid Kagan; Scott K Heysell; Conrad Muzoora Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-06-18