Joji Suzuki1,2,3, Stephanie Garayalde2,3, Martekuor Dodoo4,3, Claudia Rodriguez1,2,3. 1. a Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA. 2. b Harvard Medical School , Boston , Massachusetts , USA. 3. d Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk , Virginia , USA. 4. c Psychiatry Residency Program , University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that physicians and residents may not have sufficient knowledge to appropriately interpret urine drug tests (UDTs) in patients who are prescribed opioids or using illicit substances. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey psychiatry residents and fellows about their confidence and knowledge in interpreting UDTs in patients with chronic pain or receiving office-based opioid treatment. METHODS: All psychiatry residency and fellowship program directors in the New England states were approached to recruit their trainees to participate in an anonymous online survey including a 7-item knowledge test. RESULTS: A total of 93 residents and fellows completed the survey. Only a minority (24.7%) reported any prior training in UDT interpretation. A majority (62.6%) felt confident about interpreting UDTs. The mean total score for the knowledge test was 3.5 (SD =1.1, range: 1-6). There were no significant differences in total score by confidence in UDT interpretation (3.7 vs. 3.4, t = -1.17, nonsignificant [NS]), nor by prior training in UDT interpretation (3.8 vs. 3.5, t = -1.22, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatry residents and fellows infrequently receive training in UDT interpretation, score poorly on the knowledge test, and their confidence in UDT interpretation does not reflect their knowledge. Future research should evaluate educational interventions that improve UDT interpretation among psychiatry residents and fellows.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that physicians and residents may not have sufficient knowledge to appropriately interpret urine drug tests (UDTs) in patients who are prescribed opioids or using illicit substances. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey psychiatry residents and fellows about their confidence and knowledge in interpreting UDTs in patients with chronic pain or receiving office-based opioid treatment. METHODS: All psychiatry residency and fellowship program directors in the New England states were approached to recruit their trainees to participate in an anonymous online survey including a 7-item knowledge test. RESULTS: A total of 93 residents and fellows completed the survey. Only a minority (24.7%) reported any prior training in UDT interpretation. A majority (62.6%) felt confident about interpreting UDTs. The mean total score for the knowledge test was 3.5 (SD =1.1, range: 1-6). There were no significant differences in total score by confidence in UDT interpretation (3.7 vs. 3.4, t = -1.17, nonsignificant [NS]), nor by prior training in UDT interpretation (3.8 vs. 3.5, t = -1.22, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatry residents and fellows infrequently receive training in UDT interpretation, score poorly on the knowledge test, and their confidence in UDT interpretation does not reflect their knowledge. Future research should evaluate educational interventions that improve UDT interpretation among psychiatry residents and fellows.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic pain; opioid use disorder; opioids; urine drug testing
Authors: Isaac Chua; Athena K Petrides; Gordon D Schiff; Jaime R Ransohoff; Michalis Kantartjis; Jocelyn Streid; Christiana A Demetriou; Stacy E F Melanson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 5.128