Literature DB >> 29696594

Using eye movements to understand the leakage of information during Chinese reading.

Yanping Liu1, Erik D Reichle2.   

Abstract

How is attention allocated during reading? The present eye-movement experiment used a paradigm developed by Liu and Reichle (Psychological Science, 29, 278-287, 2018) to examine object-based attention during reading: Participants were instructed to read one of two spatially overlapping sentences containing colocated target/distractor words of varying frequency. Although target-word frequency modulated fixation-duration measures on the target word, the distractor-word frequency also had a smaller, independent effect. Survival analyses indicate that the distractor-word effect occurred later than the target-word effect, suggesting that subtle orthographic cues were noticed either later or occasionally, thereby modulating decisions about when to move the eyes. The theoretical ramifications of this "leakage" of information are discussed with respect to the general question of attention allocation during reading and possible differences between the reading of Chinese versus English.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Eye movements; Reading; Survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696594      PMCID: PMC6202280          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1475-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?

Authors:  A W Inhoff; M Starr; K L Shindler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-10

2.  Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Simon P Liversedge; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29

7.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

Review 8.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Heather Sheridan; Katie L Meadmore; Denis Drieghe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.