Yu Ke1, Terence Ng1, Alexandre Chan2,3,4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Blk S4A level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. 2. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Blk S4A level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. phaac@nus.edu.sg. 3. Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. phaac@nus.edu.sg. 4. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. phaac@nus.edu.sg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Well-elucidated survivorship care models are pertinent in the long-term management of cancer survivors. This review aims to update existing literature and evaluate the key components of such models with a focus on breast, colorectal, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. METHODS: The PubMed electronic database were searched comprehensively for relevant publications in English through February 2017. Additional manual searches were conducted for reference lists and official guidelines published by oncology societies. Included studies addressed the correct cancer type, elaborated on each model's structure and provided patient-related outcome data to support its model's effectiveness if applicable. RESULTS: Among the 25 included studies, six articles described survivorship models applicable to all cancer types, and the remaining focused on breast cancer (n = 10), colorectal cancer (n = 3), and AYA cancer survivors (n = 6). Shared-care model was largely described for all cancer types whereas multidisciplinary model predominated for AYA cancer survivors. Upon evaluation, these models described the essential components of survivorship care fairly well except for the care coordination component. Also, the definition of time points of care was vague and noncomprehensive. CONCLUSION: The reviewed survivorship model studies were comprehensive but were limited by a lack of existing rigorous evaluation efforts to assess their effectiveness. This review further provided valuable recommendations for future methodological evaluation of such models. This review has highlighted care coordination as an area for improvement and emphasized the importance of obtaining data on the effectiveness of these survivorship models to ensure satisfactory quality of life and health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Well-elucidated survivorship care models are pertinent in the long-term management of cancer survivors. This review aims to update existing literature and evaluate the key components of such models with a focus on breast, colorectal, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. METHODS: The PubMed electronic database were searched comprehensively for relevant publications in English through February 2017. Additional manual searches were conducted for reference lists and official guidelines published by oncology societies. Included studies addressed the correct cancer type, elaborated on each model's structure and provided patient-related outcome data to support its model's effectiveness if applicable. RESULTS: Among the 25 included studies, six articles described survivorship models applicable to all cancer types, and the remaining focused on breast cancer (n = 10), colorectal cancer (n = 3), and AYA cancer survivors (n = 6). Shared-care model was largely described for all cancer types whereas multidisciplinary model predominated for AYA cancer survivors. Upon evaluation, these models described the essential components of survivorship care fairly well except for the care coordination component. Also, the definition of time points of care was vague and noncomprehensive. CONCLUSION: The reviewed survivorship model studies were comprehensive but were limited by a lack of existing rigorous evaluation efforts to assess their effectiveness. This review further provided valuable recommendations for future methodological evaluation of such models. This review has highlighted care coordination as an area for improvement and emphasized the importance of obtaining data on the effectiveness of these survivorship models to ensure satisfactory quality of life and health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents and young adults; Breast cancer; Cancer survivors; Colorectal cancer; Survivorship model
Authors: Steven C Palmer; Linda A Jacobs; Angela DeMichele; Betsy Risendal; Alison F Jones; Carrie Tompkins Stricker Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Arnold L Potosky; Paul K J Han; Julia Rowland; Carrie N Klabunde; Tenbroeck Smith; Noreen Aziz; Craig Earle; John Z Ayanian; Patricia A Ganz; Michael Stefanek Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carolyn D Runowicz; Corinne R Leach; N Lynn Henry; Karen S Henry; Heather T Mackey; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado; Rachel S Cannady; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Stephen B Edge; Linda A Jacobs; Arti Hurria; Lawrence B Marks; Samuel J LaMonte; Ellen Warner; Gary H Lyman; Patricia A Ganz Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Tai Hutchinson; Sarah Hoffe; Sabrina Saeed; Sonya A Pflanzer; Jason B Fleming; Smitha Pabbathi Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Alexandre Chan; Fred Ashbury; Margaret I Fitch; Bogda Koczwara; Raymond Javan Chan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nadia C W Kamminga; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Margot C W Joosen; Karlijn de Joode; Arjen Joosse; Dirk J Grünhagen; Tamar E C Nijsten; Marlies Wakkee; Marjolein Lugtenberg Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 11.113