| Literature DB >> 29696138 |
Qingzi Tang1, Tongdan Duan1, Peng Li2, Ping Zhang1,2, Daishe Wu1.
Abstract
In this work, the potential of a novel hydroxyapatite decorated with carbon nanotube composite (CNT-HAP) for fluoride removal was investigated. The synthesized CNT-HAP composite was systematically characterized by X-ray diffraction(XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller(BET). Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to investigate the defluorination capacity of CNT-HAP. The CNT-HAP composite has a maximum adsorption capacity of 11.05 mg·g-1 for fluoride, and the isothermal adsorption data were fitted by the Freundlich model to calculate the thermodynamic parameters. Thermodynamic analysis implies that the adsorption of fluoride on CNT-HAP is a spontaneous process. Furthermore, the adsorption of fluoride follows pseudo-second-order model. The effects of solution pH, co-existing anions and reaction temperature on defluorination efficiency were examined to optimize the operation conditions for fluoride adsorption. It is found that the optimized pH-value for fluoride removal by CNT-HAP composite is 6. In addition, among five common anions studied in this work, the presence of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] could considerably affect the fluoride removal by CNT-HPA in aqueous media. Finally, the underlying mechanism for the fluoride removal by CNT-HAP is analyzed, and an anion exchange process is proposed.Entities:
Keywords: fluoride removal; hydroxyapatite decorated with carbon nanotube (CNT-HAP); hydroxyl anions; ion-exchanged; removal mechanism
Year: 2018 PMID: 29696138 PMCID: PMC5904275 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1XRD patterns of CNT-HAP (a), HAP (b), and CNT (c).
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of CNT, HAP, and CNT-HAP.
Figure 3SEM images of CNT (a), HAP (b), and CNT-HAP (c).
Figure 4Adsorption isotherms of fluoride on HAP (A) and CNT-HAP (B) at three different temperatures (adsorbents dosage: 0.5 g·L−1, pH: 7.0).
Comparison of fluoride adsorption capacities of pristine HAP and various HAP-based materials.
| HAP powder | 4.7 | 20 | 7.0 | Jiménez-Reyes and Solache-Ríos, |
| Nano-HAP/Chitin | 3.0 | 10 | 7.0 | Sairam Sundaram et al., |
| Al-HAP adsorption membrane | 7.15 | 10 | 7.0 | He et al., |
| HAP-coated-limestone | 9.3 | 50 | 7.0 | Kanno et al., |
| Synthetic nano-HAP | 4.8 | 80 | 5.0–6.0 | Gao et al., |
| DTAB-HAP powder | 3.436 | 10 | 7.0 | Prabhu and Meenakshi, |
| Nano-HAP/Chitosan | 1.56 | 10 | 7.0 | Sairam Sundarama, |
| Synthetic siderite | 1.775 | 3–20 | 4.0–9.0 | Liu et al., |
| bone char | 4.81 | 10 | 7.2–7.7 | Nigri et al., |
| cerium-containing bone char | 13.6 | 10 | 7.0 | Zúñiga-Muro et al., |
Fitted Langmuir and Freundlich model parameters for fluoride adsorption on HAP and CNT-HAP composite at different temperatures.
| HAP | 25 | 5.01 | 0.55 | 0.9772 | 2.63 | 6.56 | 0.8932 |
| HAP | 35 | 6.25 | 0.50 | 0.9493 | 3.07 | 5.88 | 0.9136 |
| HAP | 45 | 6.81 | 1.08 | 0.9479 | 4.07 | 7.77 | 0.8933 |
| CNT-HAP | 25 | 11.05 | 0.18 | 0.9142 | 3.57 | 3.96 | 0.9735 |
| CNT-HAP | 35 | 13.57 | 0.17 | 0.9075 | 4.26 | 3.88 | 0.9695 |
| CNT-HAP | 45 | 16.78 | 0.17 | 0.8835 | 5.08 | 3.74 | 0.9831 |
The thermodynamic parameters of fluoride adsorption on HAP and CNT-HAP composite.
| CNT-HAP | 25 | −16.53 | 6.67 | ||
| CNT-HAP | 35 | −17.78 | 20.68 | 124.38 | 6.94 |
| CNT-HAP | 45 | −19.03 | 7.19 | ||
| HAP | 25 | −15.54 | 19.80 | 118.72 | 6.27 |
| HAP | 35 | −16.81 | 6.56 | ||
| HAP | 45 | −17.90 | 6.77 |
Figure 5Nonlinear fitting for kinetic data of fluoride adsorption on HAP and CNT-HAP.
Fitted kinetic parameters for fluoride adsorption on HAP and CNT-HAP composite.
| HAP | 0.22 | 4.73 | 0.9204 | 0.09 | 4.85 | 0.9827 |
| CNT-HAP | 0.20 | 5.70 | 0.3956 | 0.05 | 5.97 | 0.8277 |
Figure 6Effects of pH (3.0–11.0) (A) and coexisting anions (B) on the removal of fluoride by HAP and CNT-HAP (adsorbents dosage: 0.5 g·L−1, C0 = 10 mg·L−1, reaction time = 24 h, temperature = 25°C).
Figure 7XPS spectra of the HAP (A) and CNT-HAP (B) before and after fluoride adsorption.
Figure 8Illustration of the underlying mechanism for fluoride removal by CNT-HAP.