Tranexamic acid reduces intraoperative occult blood loss and tourniquet time in obese knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Obesity can result in increased blood loss, which is correlated with poor prognosis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Clinical application of tranexamic acid is effective in reducing blood loss in TKA. However, most previous studies focused on the effect of tranexamic acid in the whole population, neglecting patients with specific health conditions, such as obesity. We hypothesized that tranexamic acid would reduce blood loss to a greater extent in obese patients than in those of normal weight. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 304 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with TKA from October 2013 to March 2015 were separated into tranexamic, non-tranexamic, obese, and non-obese groups. The demographic characteristics, surgical indices, and hematological indices were all recorded. We first investigated the ability of intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce intraoperative blood loss in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unilateral TKA. Second, we performed subgroup analysis to compare the effects of tranexamic acid between obese and non-obese patients separately.
RESULTS: Of the 304 patients, 146 (52.0%) received tranexamic acid and 130 (42.8%) were obese. In the analysis of the whole group, both the actual and occult blood loss volume were lower in the tranexamic acid group (both P < 0.05). Tourniquet time was shorter in the tranexamic acid group (P < 0.05). In subgroup analysis, tranexamic acid was shown to reduce theoretical and actual blood loss in both the obese and non-obese groups (P < 0.05). Tranexamic acid reduced occult blood loss and tourniquet time in the obese group (P < 0.05), while no such effects were observed in the non-obese group (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid can reduce occult blood loss and tourniquet time in obese patients to a greater extent than in patients of normal weight. Therefore, obese knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing TKA can benefit more from tranexamic acid.

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the optimal surgical option for severe knee osteoarthritis, and is now a well-established surgical technology. The demand for primary TKA is expected to increase to 3.48 million per year by 2030 in the USA.1 Through TKA, joint deformity correction, pain relief, walking function restoration, and improved quality of life can all be achieved. However, although TKA has many advantages, there are still some drawbacks.

Previous studies showed that TKA is likely to cause a large amount of perioperative blood loss.2,3 This will not only increase the cost of surgery and risk of adverse events but also the probability of periprosthetic infection and even poor-quality extremity function.4 Obesity aggravates this situation and can give rise to greater blood loss, which is correlated with a poor prognosis in surgical patients.5–7 Therefore, the importance of blood conservation in obese patients with TKA surgery should not be underestimated.

Clinical application of tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding can be traced back to the 1970s, with it initially being used mainly in cardiovascular surgery, and then gradually being applied in trauma and gastrointestinal hemorrhage surgery.8–10 The application of tranexamic acid in TKA surgery has become increasingly common in recent years. Previous studies have indicated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid for reducing visible and occult blood loss in TKA.11–15 However, most of these studies examined the effects of tranexamic acid on the general population. Only a few focused on patients with specific health states, such as obesity.16,17

Here, we hypothesized that tranexamic acid may reduce blood loss to a greater extent in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) compared with those of normal weight (BMI <30 kg/m2). After investigating the ability of intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce intraoperative blood loss in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unilateral TKA, we performed a subgroup analysis to separately compare the effects of tranexamic acid in obese and non-obese patients. This study provides a more in-depth understanding of the characteristics of tranexamic acid for clinical reference.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

This prospective, observational cohort study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. From October 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015, four senior surgeons at the Department of Orthopedics of Chinese PLA General Hospital prospectively enrolled 427 consecutive knee osteoarthritis patients treated with TKA into this study. Knee osteoarthritis was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and radiographic test. The Kellgren–Lawrence grading scale was used for grading knee osteoarthritis.18 The choice of treatment is based on clinical symptoms including pain and decreased function. If the pain or decreased function seriously affects daily life and conservative management is ineffective, TKA is recommended. The Kellgren–Lawrence scale is usually grade III or above. All four surgeons have experience with TKA surgery. Patients were included if they underwent TKA for treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Forty patients were excluded based on the following exclusion criteria: 1) age <40 or >90 years; 2) pre-existing hemorrhagic or coagulation disorders; and 3) refusal to participate in the study. After primary screening, 387 participants fulfilled the basic criteria, of whom 83 were excluded because they were undergoing revision arthroplasty or staged or simultaneous bilateral TKA. Thus, 304 participants were finally enrolled in the study (Figure 1). All patients provided written informed consent.

Figure 1

Study cohort and design.

Abbreviations: TKA, total knee arthroplasty; PLAGH, Chinese PLA General Hospital.

Treatment assignment

After admission, all participants underwent a detailed preoperative examination followed by TKA. The surgical protocol was designed by four senior surgeons at the Department of Orthopedics of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Before surgery, 146 participants received intravenous tranexamic acid at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight (10 mg/kg 10 min before making initial incision and another 10 mg/kg 10 min before tourniquet release), while the others were not treated with tranexamic acid; ie, the participants were divided into tranexamic acid and non-tranexamic acid groups. The tourniquet was inflated to 300–330 mmHg before making initial incision and released following wound closure. The pressure was set according to the patient’s blood pressure.

Data collection

After admission, participants’ demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and previous medical history data were collected. Surgeons also recorded preoperative parameters, such as diagnoses, physical examination, and radiographic results. In addition, surgical details such as intraoperative blood loss volume, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume, operation time, and tourniquet use were also recorded. Postoperative local swelling and drainage volume were recorded. The postoperative local swelling was defined as swelling around the incision area after surgery.

The complete blood cell count results at 1 d preoperatively and 1 d postoperatively were recorded using a hematology analyzer (XE-2100; Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). With regard to hematological parameters, total blood volume, theoretical blood loss volume, intraoperative blood loss volume, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume, actual blood loss volume, and occult blood loss volume were also calculated and recorded.

Total blood volume was calculated based on the equation of Nadler et al:19 for male patients, total blood volume (mL) = 366.9 × height3 (m3) + 32.19 × weight (kg) + 604.1; for female patients, total blood volume (mL) = 356.1 × height3 (m3) + 33.08 × weight (kg) + 183.3. Theoretical blood loss volume was calculated by the equation of Gross:20 theoretical blood loss volume (mL) = total blood volume (mL) × (preoperative 1 d hematocrit – postoperative 1 d hematocrit). As the Gross equation does not take into account red blood cell transfusion, we calculated the actual blood loss volume using the following equation: actual blood loss volume (mL) = theoretical blood loss volume (mL) + red blood cell transfusion volume. Occult blood loss volume (mL) = actual blood loss volume (mL) – intraoperative blood loss volume (mL).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). For the measured variables, normality of distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed data are presented as means ± SD. Differences between groups were compared using Student’s t-test. For abnormally distributed variables or those with heterogeneity of variance, the data are presented as the median and interquartile range (Q1, Q3). Differences between groups were compared by the Mann–Whitney U-test. For categorical data, the number of patients in each category was recorded. Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison between groups where appropriate. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Study population

Of the 304 subjects included in the study, 250 (82.8%) were females and 54 (17.8%) were males. The average age was 66.06 years (range: 44–87 years). Hypertension was the most common complication, with an incidence of 59.6% (173 cases). Other major preoperative complications were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction. All participants received anticoagulation therapy perioperatively. Among them, 181 (59.5%) received oral rivaroxaban, while 123 (40.5%) received hypodermic injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (Table 1). A total of 146 (52.0%) patients received tranexamic acid, and 130 (42.8%) patients were obese.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of study population

Items	Total, N = 304
Gender
Male	54 (17.8%)
Female	250 (82.2%)
Age (years)	66.06 ± 7.36
Hypertension	173 (56.9%)
Diabetes mellitus	45 (14.8%)
Cardiovascular diseases	46 (15.1%)
Cerebral infarction	25 (8.2%)
Anticoagulation therapy
Rivaroxaban	181 (59.5%)
LMWH	123 (40.5%)

Abbreviation: LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin.

Comparison of baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters between tranexamic acid and non-tranexamic acid groups

The baseline characteristics were compared between the tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group. As shown in Table 2, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, pre-existing conditions, or perioperative anticoagulation therapy between the two groups. Hematological parameters were compared between the tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group. As shown in Table 3, there were no differences in hemoglobin (Hb) or hematocrit levels between the two groups at 1 d before the operation. However, significant differences in Hb and hematocrit levels were observed between the two groups on postoperative day 1. Hb and hematocrit levels were all higher in the tranexamic acid group than the non-tranexamic acid group (P < 0.05). There was no difference in total blood volume between the two groups (P > 0.05). Theoretical blood loss volume was lower in the tranexamic acid group than the non-tranexamic acid group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in intraoperative blood loss volume or intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume between the two groups (P > 0.05). The actual blood loss volume and occult blood loss volume were significantly lower in the tranexamic acid group than the non-tranexamic acid group (P < 0.05). In addition, the duration of tourniquet application was shorter in the tranexamic acid group than the non-tranexamic acid group (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in operation time, postoperative drainage volume, or postoperative local swelling between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Table 2

Comparison of clinical baseline characteristics between tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group

	Tranexamic acid group	Non-tranexamic acid group	Statistics*	P-value
	N = 146 (52.0%)	N = 158 (48.0%)
Gender			0.338	0.561
Male	24 (16.4%)	30 (19.0%)
Female	122 (83.6%)	128 (81.0%)
Age (years)	66.44 ± 6.84	65.70 ± 7.82	0.870	0.385
Hypertension	90 (61.6%)	83 (52.5%)	2.569	0.109
Diabetes mellitus	23 (15.8%)	22 (13.9%)	0.201	0.654
Cardiovascular diseases	17 (11.6%)	29 (18.4%)	2.661	0.103
Cerebral infarction	15 (10.3%)	10 (6.3%)	1.565	0.211
Anticoagulation therapy			0.000	0.986
Rivaroxaban	87 (59.6%)	94 (59.5%)
LMWH	59 (40.4%)	64 (40.5%)

Notes:

For normally distributed data, differences between groups were compared by Student’s t-test and shown as T-statistics. For categorical data, differences between groups were compared by Pearson’s chi-squared test and shown as χ2-statistics.

Abbreviation: LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin.

Table 3

Comparison of perioperative parameters between tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group

	Tranexamic acid group	Non-tranexamic acid group	Statistics*	P-value
	N = 146 (52.0%)	N = 158 (48.0%)
Preoperative 1 d Hb (g/L)	131.96 ± 11.89	131.41 ± 13.20	0.383	0.702
Preoperative 1 d HCT (%)	39.50 ± 3.26	39.36 ± 3.62	0.352	0.725
Postoperative 1 d Hb (g/L)	127.41 ± 13.59	120.73 ± 13.86	4.235	0.000
Postoperative 1 d HCT (%)	37.44 ± 3.68	35.61 ± 3.84	4.235	0.000
Total preoperative blood volume (mL)	3,901.77 (3,667.16, 4,255.21)	3,986.34 (3,614.81, 4,405.84)	−0.398	0.690
Theoretical blood loss volume (mL)	85.53 (−9.62, 156.49)	161.23 (36.06, 243.57)	−4.579	0.000
Intraoperative blood loss volume (mL)	203.63 ± 74.28	210.13 ± 75.87	−0.753	0.452
Intraoperative red cell transfusion volume (mL)	415.58 ± 118.87	403.01 ± 130.17	0.877	0.381
Actual blood loss volume (mL)	494.29 (401.39, 593.98)	553.98 (440.33, 662.33)	−3.292	0.001
Occult blood loss volume (mL)	294.97 ± 151.18	348.39 ± 173.04	−2.856	0.005
Postoperative drainage volume (mL)	54.44 ± 44.03	62.61 ± 59.93	−1.346	0.179
Operation time (min)	110.00 (95.00, 121.00)	111.00 (98.50, 128.00)	−1.212	0.225
Tourniquet time (min)	56.50 (46.00, 63.25)	61.00 (51.25, 71.00)	−3.549	0.000
Postoperative local swelling	7 (4.8%)	9 (5.7%)	0.124	0.725

Notes:

For normally distributed data, differences between groups were compared by Student’s t-test and shown as T-statistics. For abnormally distributed variables or those with heterogeneity of variance, differences between groups were compared by Mann–Whitney U-test and shown as Z-statistics. For categorical data, differences between groups were compared by Pearson’s chi-squared test and shown as χ2-statistics.

Abbreviations: Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit.

Subgroup analysis between obese and non-obese groups

As shown in Table 4, only hypertension in the obese group was significantly different between tranexamic acid and non-tranexamic acid groups. As shown in Table 5, in the non-obese group, Hb and hematocrit levels on day 1 after surgery were significantly different between the tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group. Also, the same effect was observed on the first day postoperatively in the obese group (P < 0.05). In addition, tranexamic reduced theoretical blood loss and actual blood loss in both the obese and non-obese groups (P < 0.05). Interestingly, we found that tranexamic acid reduced occult blood loss and tourniquet time in the obese group (P < 0.05), while no such effects were observed in the non-obese group (P > 0.05).

Table 4

Subgroup analysis of baseline characteristics between obese and non-obese groups

	Obese group N = 130				Non-obese group N = 174
	Tranexamic acid group N = 60	Non-tranexamic acid group N = 70	Statistics*	P-value	Tranexamic acid group N = 86	Non-tranexamic acid group N = 88	Statistics*	P-value
Gender			1.121	0.290			0.010	0.920
Male	5 (8.3%)	10 (14.3%)			19 (22.1%)	20 (22.7%)
Female	55 (91.7%)	60 (85.7%)			67 (77.9%)	68 (77.3%)
Age (years)	65.82 ± 7.00	64.80 ± 7.80	0.694	0.489	66.87 ± 6.73	66.42 ± 7.81	0.408	0.684
Hypertension	47 (78.3%)	43 (61.4%)	4.334	0.037	43 (50.0%)	40 (45.5%)	0.360	0.548
Diabetes mellitus	13 (21.7%)	9 (12.9%)	1.783	0.182	10 (11.6%)	13 (14.8%)	0.375	0.540
Cardiovascular diseases	4 (6.7%)	11 (15.7%)	2.591	0.107	13 (15.1%)	18 (20.5%)	0.847	0.358
Cerebral infarction	5 (8.3%)	4 (5.7%)	0.058	0.810	10 (11.6%)	6 (6.8%)	1.205	0.272
Anticoagulation therapy			0.028	0.868			0.033	0.857
Rivaroxaban	36 (60.0%)	43 (61.4%)			51 (59.3%)	51 (58.0%)
LMWH	24 (40.0%)	27 (38.6%)			35 (40.7%)	37 (42.0%)

Notes:

For normally distributed data, differences between groups were compared by Student’s t-test and shown as T-statistics. For categorical data, differences between groups were compared by Pearson’s chi-squared test and shown as χ2-statistics.

Abbreviation: LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin.

Table 5

Subgroup analysis of perioperative parameters between obese and non-obese groups

	Obese group N = 130				Non-obese group N = 174
	Tranexamic acid group, N = 60	Non-tranexamic acid group, N = 70	Statistics*	P-value	Tranexamic acid group, N = 86	Non-tranexamic acid group, N = 88	Statistics*	P-value
Preoperative 1 d Hb (g/L)	132.52 ± 8.70	133.37 ± 12.46	−0.446	0.656	131.57 ± 13.72	129.84 ± 13.63	0.834	0.406
Preoperative 1 d HCT (%)	39.74 ± 2.35	40.04 ± 3.57	−0.555	0.580	39.33 ± 3.78	38.82 ± 3.58	0.918	0.360
Postoperative 1 d Hb (g/L)	127.72 ± 10.34	123.13 ± 12.46	2.261	0.025	127.20 ± 15.52	118.83 ± 14.67	3.656	0.000
Postoperative 1 d HCT (%)	37.70 ± 2.85	36.41 ± 3.37	2.333	0.021	37.27 ± 4.17	34.99 ± 4.09	3.650	0.000
Total preoperative blood volume (mL)	4,097.95 (3,787.49, 4,311.89)	4,168.11 (4,009.29, 4,565.07)	−1.119	0.263	3,784.57 (3,500.10, 4,147.15)	3,659.57 (3,395.03, 4,202.13)	−0.856	0.392
Theoretical blood loss volume (mL)	75.58 (−17.18, 166.57)	175.06 (30.46, 264.48)	−3.066	0.002	84.49 (−9.79, 174.84)	155.28 (72.84, 244.17)	−3.419	0.001
Intraoperative blood loss volume (mL)	209.17 ± 87.09	212.14 ± 84.03	−0.198	0.843	199.77 ± 64.11	208.52 ± 69.16	−0.886	0.388
Intraoperative red cell transfusion volume (mL)	412.50 ± 126.18	420.00 ± 109.40	−0.363	0.717	417.73 ± 114.20	389.48 ± 143.78	1.433	0.154
Actual blood loss volume (mL)	499.93 ± 148.06	578.07 ± 186.74	−2.612	0.010	497.68 ± 140.15	542.96 ± 157.73	−2.000	0.047
Occult blood loss volume (mL)	290.76 ± 153.37	365.92 ± 117.85	−2.558	0.012	297.91 ± 150.46	334.44 ± 168.84	−1.506	0.134
Postoperative drainage volume (mL)	49.67 ± 40.43	57.14 ± 51.97	−0.904	0.368	57.77 ± 46.32	66.97 ± 65.54	−1.067	0.287
Operation time (min)	114.50 (98.25, 129.25)	115.00 (99.00, 130.00)	−0.949	0.343	105.00 (95.00, 120.00)	110.00 (100.00, 130.00)	−0.658	0.510
Tourniquet time (min)	58.00 (45.00, 66.25)	68.00 (60.00, 76.00)	−3.546	0.000	56.00 (47.00, 62.00)	60.00 (50.00, 66.00)	−1.404	0.160
Postoperative local swelling	2 (3.3%)	7 (10.0%)	1.314	0.252	5 (5.8%)	2 (2.3%)	0.644	0.422

Notes:

For normally distributed data, differences between groups were compared by Student’s t-test and shown as T-statistics. For abnormally distributed variables or those with heterogeneity of variance, differences between groups were compared by Mann–Whitney U-test and shown as Z-statistics. For categorical data, differences between groups were compared by Pearson’s chi-squared test and shown as χ2-statistics.

Abbreviations: Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit.

Discussion

Anemia can lead to a prolonged hospital stay, delayed rehabilitation, and poor tolerance in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty or TKA. Therefore, the importance of blood conservation should not be underestimated.4 There are a number of ways to reduce perioperative blood loss, including preoperative blood reserves, controlled hypotension, perioperative use of erythropoietin, and intraoperative use of a tourniquet. However, these techniques are not without their own drawbacks. For example, hypotension cannot be controlled easily. If sudden surgical bleeding occurs, hypotension can make the patient more prone to cardiac arrest. In addition, the ischemic threshold of individual organs cannot be estimated, and dangerous or even life-threatening complications, such as neurological defects or myocardial ischemia, may occur.21 Therefore, surgeons are seeking safer ways to reduce perioperative blood loss.

Consistent with previous studies, the results of the present study indicated that tranexamic acid is effective for reducing blood loss in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unilateral TKA. A previous meta-analysis by Yang et al showed that tranexamic acid was effective and safe for reducing blood loss in patients undergoing TKA.22 As with blood transfusion, Seol et al found that tranexamic acid is effective in reducing the red blood cell transfusion volume. In addition, tranexamic acid was reported to reduce the volume of blood transfusion from 1.28 to 0.76 units.23 Another meta-analysis indicated that blood loss and transfusion rates in primary TKA can be effectively reduced by the use of tranexamic acid.24 However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative red cell transfusion volume between the tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group in the present study.

Obese patients are more prone to have elevated levels of blood lipids, which promotes atherosclerosis. Considering the altered vascular structure and hemodynamics seen in obese patients, massive blood loss and prolonged tourniquet use intraoperatively can have serious consequences. This is correlated with a poor clinical prognosis in TKA patients.5–7 To investigate how to avoid this situation, various studies performed subgroup analysis to compare the effect of tranexamic acid between obese and non-obese patients. Meftah compared the effect of tranexamic acid on change in hematocrit and blood transfusion rate between normal weight and morbidly obese patients. They found the transfusion rate and drop in hematocrit were significantly less for morbidly obese patients who received tranexamic acid.16 Tuttle et al compared delta Hb, postoperative Hb, and transfusion rate between patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2. They found patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had a significant difference in their delta Hb, postoperative Hb, and transfusion rate.17 However, they only compared hematological indexes such as hematocrit and Hb, which cannot exclude the interference of external factors such as blood transfusion. To minimize such interference, we calculated and compared the actual blood loss volume based on previously proposed equations.19,20 Interestingly, we found differences in the effects of tranexamic acid between the two groups. First, tranexamic acid effectively reduced intraoperative occult blood loss in obese patients (P = 0.012). However, no such effect was observed in non-obese patients (P = 0.134). Second, tranexamic acid effectively reduced the intraoperative tourniquet time in obese patients (P = 0.000), while no such effect was seen in non-obese patients (P = 0.160). Additionally, for those patients who did not use tranexamic acid, the obese patients had significantly longer tourniquet time than the non-obese patients (median 68.00 vs 60.00, P = 0.000). For those patients who used tranexamic acid, the tourniquet time of obese patients reduced to the same level as the non-obese patients (median 58.00 vs 56.00, P = 0.570). These observations indicated that tranexamic acid can reduce occult blood loss and tourniquet time to a greater extent in obese patients than in non-obese patients. Thus, tranexamic acid can effectively solve the problem of blood loss control in obese patients.

In this study, there was a strong imbalance between males (17.8%) and females (82.8%). After reviewing the relevant papers, females have greater knee osteoarthritis prevalence (67.4%) and a greater proportion of women have mobility limitations as well as hip and knee pain. The proportion of female patients with severe knee osteoarthritis who received TKA was even higher than 67.4%.25 Our study is consistent with the results of this previous study. Additionally, we further analyzed the distribution differences of genders between obese/non-obese groups and tranexamic acid/non-tranexamic acid groups (Table 4). We found no significant differences of genders between groups. Therefore, the minimum effect due to gender distribution on the result can be guaranteed. Obesity is a mixed disease state, which is usually accompanied by other metabolic syndromes, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cholesterol changes. We performed baseline analysis on possible comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and cerebral infarction. From Table 2, we can see there were no statistical differences in comorbidities between the tranexamic acid group and non-tranexamic acid group. From Table 4, we can see only the obese group had a slight imbalance in hypertension. A further analysis showed an imbalance of hypertension distribution between obese and non-obese groups.

Tranexamic acid was administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight (10 mg/kg 10 min before making initial incision and another 10 mg/kg 10 min before tourniquet release) in the present study. There have been a number of studies examining the optimal dose and mode of administration of tranexamic acid. Some authors preferred intravenous administration of tranexamic acid, as in the present study, while others preferred oral or topical administration. Cankaya et al found that oral and topical tranexamic acid administration were safe, efficient, and economical methods for reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in patients undergoing TKA.14 However, most recent studies indicated that the effects of oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid were the same.12,13 A recent meta-analysis by Dai et al also found no difference between topical and intravenous tranexamic acid in terms of transfusion rate or total blood loss.11 As with the dose of tranexamic acid, 20 mg/kg body weight is consistent with the review of Melvin et al, indicating that an intravenous dose of 10–20 mg/kg tranexamic acid is reasonable for patients undergoing primary TKA.26 This dose was also consistent with other previous studies and proved to be valid to meet clinical requirement.27,28

Considering the previously mentioned results in this study, one possible mechanism of action of the drug is that tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic amino acid that can reversibly bind lysine receptor sites on plasminogen or plasmin. It further prevents binding of plasmin and fibrin, thus inhibiting plasmin proteolytic activity.29 On the other hand, in patients with metabolic syndrome as well as obesity, PAI-1 has been proven to be present at an increased level.30 PAI-1 functions as an inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator. PAI-1 can prevent the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. Under such circumstances, tranexamic acid and PAI-1 are two important inhibitors of fibrinolysis, and their synergism can modulate a greater antifibrinolysis effect. The effect of metabolic syndromes on tranexamic acid may be clarified by further animal experiments.

In this study, all operations were performed by four senior orthopedic surgeons, thus minimizing any effect of the different preferences and experience levels among surgeons. In addition, all data in this study were collected prospectively, and the surgeons and data analysts were blinded. However, this study had the limitations of being performed in a single center with a relatively small study population. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials in larger populations are required. Additionally, all the patients were treated with the same dose of tranexamic acid with no regard to gender, blood volume or other factors. Based on the result of this study, we are proposing that adjusting the dose according to gender and blood volume would be a potential research target. Further research is required.

Conclusion

In conclusion, tranexamic acid can reduce intraoperative blood loss and tourniquet time in TKA patients. However, subgroup analysis between obese and non-obese patients indicated that tranexamic acid can reduce occult blood loss and tourniquet time to a greater extent in obese patients than in those of normal weight. Therefore, obese knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing TKA can benefit more from tranexamic acid.