Literature DB >> 29695523

ThermoMixer-Aided Endpoint Quaking-Induced Conversion (EP-QuIC) Permits Faster Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD) Identification than Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion (RT-QuIC).

Robert Vendramelli1, Keding Cheng2,3, Angela Sloan1, Sharon L R Simon1, Debra Godal1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  EP-QuIC; RT-QuIC; prions; sCJD

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29695523      PMCID: PMC6018336          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00423-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.

LETTER

We recently reported a method called endpoint quaking-induced conversion (EP-QuIC) (1), which is modified from real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) (2–4), to aid in antemortem diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD). In both QuIC reactions, the presence of minute amounts of misfolded prion protein induces the conversion of exogenous recombinant prion protein (rPrP) during intermittent shaking at 42°C (900 rpm for 90 s and rest for 30 s for each round), which is monitored fluorometrically (1–4). RT-QuIC uses a plate reader for the shaking step and needs approximately 90 h of incubation. However, shaking performed at high speed for extended periods of time increases the wear on the hardware, resulting in the need for repeated servicing of the system (1). On the other hand, EP-QuIC utilizes a benchtop shaking incubator (a ThermoMixer), and relative fluorescent units (RFU) are quantified at the beginning (RFUinitial; time zero) and end (RFUfinal, time 90 h) of the reaction. While our report demonstrated that the diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of the two methods were in almost perfect agreement, it was observed that EP-QuIC reactions elicited higher RFU values at the 90-h reaction time and that the thresholds determined for the two versions of the test were distinctly different (1). This prompted us to investigate the dynamics of these two QuIC platforms. Control material and diagnostically defined human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were tested. The negative control was artificial CSF (Harvard Apparatus), and the positive control was a 10−2 dilution of product as seed (PAS), made from the positive QuIC reaction products from an autopsy-confirmed sCJD patient (5). Tests performed on these control samples were confirmed to be as highly reproducible as earlier tests (1). Table S1 in the supplemental material and graphs in Fig. 1 show results of testing randomly selected representative clinical samples; 6 autopsy-confirmed sCJD CSF samples and 7 diagnostically confirmed non-CJD (nCJD) CSF samples were analyzed by EP-QuIC and RT-QuIC as previously described (1), with additional manual reads of EP-QuIC plates performed at 16-, 40-, 47-, 64-, 72-, and 90-h intervals. The EP-QuIC reactions were found to take place faster, with all sCJD samples exhibiting a saturated signal at 47 h, while RT-QuIC signals from some sCJD samples were still increasing at 90 h. Single-well autoaggregation was seen with one negative control after 64 h and with two nCJD samples after 72 h on EP-QuIC and with one nCJD sample at 90 h on RT-QuIC. When the cutoff threshold at 47 h was set at a value of 2 (RFUfinal/RFUinitial) for EP-QuIC, instead of the value of 4 required for a 90-h reaction time (1), its sensitivity and specificity were same as those seen with RT-QuIC at 90 h when the same threshold was used (both were 100% sensitive and specific) (see Table S2A). Validation tests performed on 51 CSF samples (27 sCJD, 24 nCJD) confirmed this observation (see Table S2B).
FIG 1

EP-QuIC and RT-QuIC dynamics of well-confirmed sCJD-negative (N) samples (n = 7) and sCJD-positive (P) samples (n = 6). The negative control (NEG) was artificial CSF, and the positive control (POS) was a 10−2 dilution of product as seed (PAS). Both EP-QuIC and RT-QuIC were performed on the basis of a method described in reference 1 (please see the main text for further details).

EP-QuIC and RT-QuIC dynamics of well-confirmed sCJD-negative (N) samples (n = 7) and sCJD-positive (P) samples (n = 6). The negative control (NEG) was artificial CSF, and the positive control (POS) was a 10−2 dilution of product as seed (PAS). Both EP-QuIC and RT-QuIC were performed on the basis of a method described in reference 1 (please see the main text for further details). Many factors affect QuIC reactions (6), and there has been no international standard determined for this test. The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) protocol for analytical method validation recommended by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA accepts a signal twice the level of noise (background) for qualitative analyses (7, 8). We highly recommend using EP-QuIC with daily reading for less than 48 h; if an average reading is twice the background level, a positive reaction should be called.
  6 in total

1.  Altered rPrP substrate structures and their influence on real-time quaking induced conversion reactions.

Authors:  Keding Cheng; Angela Sloan; Brooks Waitt; Robert Vendramelli; Debra Godal; Sharon L R Simon; Joe O'Neil; Michael Carpenter; Dave Jackson; Jane Eastlake; Gary Mallinson; J David Knox
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Rapid end-point quantitation of prion seeding activity with sensitivity comparable to bioassays.

Authors:  Jason M Wilham; Christina D Orrú; Richard A Bessen; Ryuichiro Atarashi; Kazunori Sano; Brent Race; Kimberly D Meade-White; Lara M Taubner; Andrew Timmes; Byron Caughey
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 6.823

3.  Real time quaking-induced conversion analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Authors:  Lynne I McGuire; Alexander H Peden; Christina D Orrú; Jason M Wilham; Nigel E Appleford; Gary Mallinson; Mary Andrews; Mark W Head; Byron Caughey; Robert G Will; Richard S G Knight; Alison J E Green
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Factors That Improve RT-QuIC Detection of Prion Seeding Activity.

Authors:  Christina D Orrú; Andrew G Hughson; Bradley R Groveman; Katrina J Campbell; Kelsie J Anson; Matteo Manca; Allison Kraus; Byron Caughey
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Endpoint Quaking-Induced Conversion: a Sensitive, Specific, and High-Throughput Method for Antemortem Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease.

Authors:  Keding Cheng; Robert Vendramelli; Angela Sloan; Brooks Waitt; Lisa Podhorodecki; Debra Godal; J David Knox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Cerebrospinal fluid real-time quaking-induced conversion is a robust and reliable test for sporadic creutzfeldt-jakob disease: An international study.

Authors:  Lynne I McGuire; Anna Poleggi; Ilaria Poggiolini; Silvia Suardi; Katarina Grznarova; Song Shi; Bart de Vil; Shannon Sarros; Katsuya Satoh; Keding Cheng; Maria Cramm; Graham Fairfoul; Matthias Schmitz; Inga Zerr; Patrick Cras; Michele Equestre; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Ryuichiro Atarashi; David Knox; Steven Collins; Stéphane Haïk; Piero Parchi; Maurizio Pocchiari; Alison Green
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.422

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A field-deployable diagnostic assay for the visual detection of misfolded prions.

Authors:  Peter R Christenson; Manci Li; Gage Rowden; Marc D Schwabenlander; Tiffany M Wolf; Sang-Hyun Oh; Peter A Larsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Quaking-induced conversion of prion protein on a thermal mixer accelerates detection in brains infected with transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents.

Authors:  Nadine Kaelber; Cyrus Bett; David M Asher; Luisa Gregori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.