Literature DB >> 29695312

Microbial Preparations (Probiotics) for the Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of 6,851 Participants.

Bradley C Johnston1, Lyubov Lytvyn2, Calvin Ka-Fung Lo3, Stephen J Allen4, Duolao Wang4, Hania Szajewska5, Mark Miller6, Stephan Ehrhardt7, John Sampalis6, Deniz G Duman8, Pietro Pozzoni9, Agostino Colli9, Elisabet Lönnermark10, Christian P Selinger11, Samford Wong12, Susan Plummer13, Mary Hickson14, Ruzha Pancheva15, Sandra Hirsch16, Bengt Klarin17, Joshua Z Goldenberg18, Li Wang19, Lawrence Mbuagbaw2, Gary Foster20, Anna Maw21, Behnam Sadeghirad2, Lehana Thabane2, Dominik Mertz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVETo determine whether probiotic prophylaxes reduce the odds of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults and children.DESIGNIndividual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), adjusting for risk factors.METHODSWe searched 6 databases and 11 grey literature sources from inception to April 2016. We identified 32 RCTs (n=8,713); among them, 18 RCTs provided IPD (n=6,851 participants) comparing probiotic prophylaxis to placebo or no treatment (standard care). One reviewer prepared the IPD, and 2 reviewers extracted data, rated study quality, and graded evidence quality.RESULTSProbiotics reduced CDI odds in the unadjusted model (n=6,645; odds ratio [OR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.55) and the adjusted model (n=5,074; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.23-0.55). Using 2 or more antibiotics increased the odds of CDI (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.11-4.37), whereas age, sex, hospitalization status, and high-risk antibiotic exposure did not. Adjusted subgroup analyses suggested that, compared to no probiotics, multispecies probiotics were more beneficial than single-species probiotics, as was using probiotics in clinical settings where the CDI risk is ≥5%. Of 18 studies, 14 reported adverse events. In 11 of these 14 studies, the adverse events were retained in the adjusted model. Odds for serious adverse events were similar for both groups in the unadjusted analyses (n=4,990; OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.26) and adjusted analyses (n=4,718; OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28). Missing outcome data for CDI ranged from 0% to 25.8%. Our analyses were robust to a sensitivity analysis for missingness.CONCLUSIONSModerate quality (ie, certainty) evidence suggests that probiotic prophylaxis may be a useful and safe CDI prevention strategy, particularly among participants taking 2 or more antibiotics and in hospital settings where the risk of CDI is ≥5%.TRIAL REGISTRATIONPROSPERO 2015 identifier: CRD42015015701Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;771-781.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29695312     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  6 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics, Nutrition, and the Small Intestine.

Authors:  Taylor C Judkins; Douglas L Archer; Dean C Kramer; Rebecca J Solch
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-01-13

2.  Effect of Probiotics on Incident Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jennie Johnstone; Maureen Meade; François Lauzier; John Marshall; Erick Duan; Joanna Dionne; Yaseen M Arabi; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Lehana Thabane; Daphnee Lamarche; Michael Surette; Nicole Zytaruk; Sangeeta Mehta; Peter Dodek; Lauralyn McIntyre; Shane English; Bram Rochwerg; Tim Karachi; William Henderson; Gordon Wood; Daniel Ovakim; Margaret Herridge; John Granton; M Elizabeth Wilcox; Alberto Goffi; Henry T Stelfox; Daniel Niven; John Muscedere; François Lamontagne; Frédérick D'Aragon; Charles St-Arnaud; Ian Ball; Dave Nagpal; Martin Girard; Pierre Aslanian; Emmanuel Charbonney; David Williamson; Wendy Sligl; Jan Friedrich; Neill K Adhikari; François Marquis; Patrick Archambault; Kosar Khwaja; Arnold Kristof; James Kutsogiannis; Ryan Zarychanski; Bojan Paunovic; Brenda Reeve; François Lellouche; Paul Hosek; Jennifer Tsang; Alexandra Binnie; Sébastien Trop; Osama Loubani; Richard Hall; Robert Cirone; Steve Reynolds; Paul Lysecki; Eyal Golan; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Robert Taylor; Deborah Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Principles and Practice in Nutrition.

Authors:  Bradley C Johnston; John L Seivenpiper; Robin W M Vernooij; Russell J de Souza; David J A Jenkins; Dena Zeraatkar; Dennis M Bier; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-05-27

4.  A study into the effect of Lactobacillus casei Shirota in preventing antibiotic associated diarrhoea including Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Samford Wong; Shashivadan P Hirani; Alastair Forbes; Naveen Kumar; Ramaswamy Hariharan; Jean O'Driscoll; Anand Viswanathan; Graham Harvey; Ravi Sekhar; Ali Jamous
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-11

5.  Lactobacillus plantarum 299v Reduces the Incidence of Clostridium difficile Infection in Nephrology and Transplantation Ward-Results of One Year Extended Study.

Authors:  Sylwia Dudzicz; Agata Kujawa-Szewieczek; Katarzyna Kwiecień; Andrzej Więcek; Marcin Adamczak
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  A novel probiotic therapeutic in a murine model of Clostridioides difficile colitis.

Authors:  Rita D Shelby; Grace E Janzow; Lauren Mashburn-Warren; Jeffrey Galley; Natalie Tengberg; Jason Navarro; Miriam Conces; Michael T Bailey; Steven D Goodman; Gail E Besner
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-11-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.