Literature DB >> 29695165

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Dabigatran 75 mg Twice Daily in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Severely Impaired Renal Function.

Jack L Martin1, Habib Esmaeili2, Raymond C Manuel3, Michaela Petrini3, Sabrina Wiebe4, Hugo Maas4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Dabigatran excretion is 80% renal, so exposure increases with severity of renal failure. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved dabigatran etexilate 75 mg twice daily (BID) for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) having severely impaired renal function (creatinine clearance: 15-30 mL/min), based on post hoc pharmacokinetic modeling. We assessed dabigatran exposure at trough and peak levels in patients with NVAF and severely impaired renal function and compared with model predictions.
METHODS: Patients received dabigatran etexilate (75 mg BID) for ≥7 days before blood sampling; Cpre,ss (steady-state predose concentration; trough) was taken 10 to 16 hours postdose (prior to next dose), and C2,ss (steady-state concentration; peak) was taken 2 hours (± 30 minutes) postdose. Pharmacodynamic parameters at baseline (Ebase), trough concentrations (Epre,ss), and peak concentrations (E2,ss) were assessed by established coagulation assays.
RESULTS: Of the 150 patients screened, 60 were treated, of which 40% were male and 78.3% were white; median age was 84 years. Cpre,ss values (n = 51) were close to pharmacokinetic modeling predictions with a geometric mean (gMean) of 155 ng/mL, geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) of 76.9%, and range of 15.6 to 498 ng/mL. The C2,ss values (n = 59) had a gMean of 202 ng/mL, gCV of 70.6%, and range of 42.0 to 680 ng/mL. Pharmacodynamic effects on coagulation paralleled dabigatran concentrations. Eleven (18.3%) patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); pharmacokinetic results for these patients versus those without AEs (n = 49) were Cpre, ss: gMean = 206 versus 145 ng/mL, gCV = 64.0% versus 78.3%; C2,ss: gMean = 243 versus 193 ng/mL, gCV = 68.9% versus 70.8%. All bleeding events (8 events in 5 patients) were considered minor by the investigators.
CONCLUSION: Dabigatran exposure levels largely confirmed earlier pharmacokinetic predictions, supporting the use of dabigatran etexilate 75 mg BID in patients with NVAF and severely impaired renal function. Pharmacodynamic results were also in agreement with earlier studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01896297.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coagulation assays; dabigatran; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; severely impaired renal function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29695165     DOI: 10.1177/1074248418769167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1074-2484            Impact factor:   2.457


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness and Safety of Under or Over-dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 148909 Patients From 10 Real-World Studies.

Authors:  Nan-Nan Shen; Chi Zhang; Na Wang; Jia-Liang Wang; Zhi-Chun Gu; Hua Han
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Retrospective Comparison of Patients ≥ 80 Years With Atrial Fibrillation Prescribed Either an FDA-Approved Reduced or Full Dose Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant.

Authors:  Roy Taoutel; Michael D Ezekowitz; Usman A Chaudhry; Carly Weber; Dana Hassan; Ed J Gracely; Mohammed H Kamareddine; Benjamin I Horn; Glenn R Harper
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 3.  Type 2 Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation, and Direct Oral Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Dana Prídavková; Matej Samoš; Tomáš Bolek; Ingrid Škorňová; Jana Žolková; Peter Kubisz; Ján Staško; Marián Mokáň
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  Characteristics and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving direct oral anticoagulants in off-label doses.

Authors:  Alexandros Briasoulis; Yubo Gao; Chakradhari Inampudi; Paulino Alvarez; Rabea Asleh; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Enrique C Leira; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.