| Literature DB >> 29695057 |
Yuhang Chen1,2,3,4, Xuerong Zhang5, Qiaosheng Guo6, Li Liu7, Chen Li8,9, Liping Cao10,11, Qin Qin12,13, Miao Zhao14,15, Wenming Wang16.
Abstract
The effects of UV-B radiation on the content of bioactive components and the antioxidant activity of Prunella vulgaris L. spica during development were studied. The experimental design involved two levels of UV-B radiation intensity (0 and 120 μW cm-2 nm-1). The results showed that the contents of total flavonoids, rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid and hyperoside, as well as the antioxidant capacities (DPPH● and ABTS•+ scavenging activities), in the spicas significantly decreased during spica development. The content of salviaflaside in the spicas significantly increased during development. The highest contents of total flavonoids, rosmarinic acid, and caffeic acid and the highest antioxidant activities were found in spicas in the full-flowering stage, while the highest content of hyperoside was found in spicas in the bud stage. In addition, the highest content of salviaflaside was found in spicas in the mature-fruiting stage. UV-B radiation significantly promoted the synthesis of secondary metabolites, increased the contents of the main bioactive components in the three developmental stages of isolated dried spicas, and significantly increased the DPPH● and ABTS•+ scavenging activities of P. vulgaris spicas in the mature-fruiting stage. Moreover, the total flavonoids content was positively correlated with the DPPH● and ABTS•+ scavenging activities, and the correlation with the DPPH● scavenging activity was very strong. This result shows that the highest contents of the main bioactive components in the spicas were not all found in the same developmental stages of P. vulgaris. Our research revealed that the best stage for harvesting P. vulgaris spica was between the bud stage and the full-flowering stage since harvesting at this point provides a higher content of bioactive components and a higher antioxidant capacity, which is relevant for medicinal applications.Entities:
Keywords: Prunella vulgaris L.; UV-B; antioxidant activity; bioactive components
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29695057 PMCID: PMC6099561 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23050989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effects of UV-B radiation on the contents of total flavonoids (A); rosmarinic acid (B); caffeic acid (C); salviaflaside (D) and hyperoside (E) in P. vulgaris spicas in three developmental stages. Control group (CK): 0 μW cm−2 nm−1; UV-B: 120 μW cm−2 nm−1; S1, the bud stage; S2 the full-flowering stage; and S3, the mature-fruiting stage. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between CK treatments and UV-B treatments, and different capital letters indicate significant differences between the three developmental stages of P. vulgaris (p < 0.05).
The DPPH● and ABTS•+ radical scavenging activities in the ethanol extracts of P. vulgaris spicas at the three developmental stages under the control and UV-B treatments.
| Antioxidant Index | UV-B Dosage | Bud Stage | Full-Flowering | Mature-Fruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH● (%) | 0 | 90.41 ± 0.23 aA | 91.24 ± 0.10 aA | 74.36 ± 2.90 aB |
| 120 | 90.35 ± 0.83 aA | 88.61 ± 0.34 bA | 70.49 ± 2.62 aB | |
| TEAC (mmol L−1 Trolox) | 0 | 1.31 ± 0.01 aA | 1.35 ± 0.02 aA | 0.80 ± 0.05 bB |
| 120 | 1.13 ± 0.05 bB | 1.33 ± 0.05 aA | 1.00 ± 0.02 aC |
Each value is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the CK and UV-B treatments, and different capital letters indicate significant differences between the three developmental stages of P. vulgaris (p < 0.05).
Correlation analysis between the contents of the bioactive compounds and the DPPH● and ABTS•+ radical scavenging activities of the ethanol extracts of P. vulgaris spicas at three developmental stages of under the control and UV-B treatments.
| Antioxidant Index | UV-B Dose (μW cm−2 nm−1) | Rosmarinic Acid (%) | Caffeic Acid (%) | Hyperoside (%) | Salviaflaside (%) | Total Flavonoids (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH● (%) | 0 | 0.993 * | 0.727 | 0.967 | −0.999 * | 0.999 * |
| 120 | 0.187 | 0.189 | 0.229 | 0.312 | 0.999 * | |
| TEAC (mmol L−1 Trolox) | 0 | 0.191 | 0.202 | 0.244 | 0.334 | 0.999 * |
| 120 | 0.132 | 0.136 | 0.163 | 0.224 | 0.720 |
* The level of significance is indicated as follows: 0.01 < p < 0.05.
Figure 2Spica development periods of P. vulgaris (from left to right: stage 1: bud stage, tage 2: full-flowering stage, and stage 3: mature-fruiting stage).
Calibration curves of 5 standard chemicals.
| Standard Chemicals | Regression Equation | R2 | Linear Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total flavonoids | 0.9999 | 0.00–2.00 | |
| Rosmarinic acid | 0.9999 | 0.000209–0.001045 | |
| Caffeic acid | 0.9999 | 0.000108–0.00054 | |
| Salviaflaside | 0.9999 | 0.00022–0.0011 | |
| Hyperoside | 0.9999 | 0.00011–0.00055 |
y: peak area; x: concentration of chemicals (mg mL−1).
Figure 3HPLC chromatograms of authentic standards and the methanol extract of P. vulgaris spicas. (A,B) UV chromatograms of the 4 authentic standards at 325 nm and 360 nm. (C,D) UV chromatograms of methanol extract at 325 nm and 360 nm. (1) caffeic acid (Y1); (2) salviaflaside (Y2); (3) rosmarinic acid (Y3); and (4) hyperoside (Y4).