Julius S Ngwa1, Thomas V Fungwe2, Oyonumo Ntekim2, Joanne S Allard3, Sheree M Johnson3, Chimene Castor2, Lennox Graham4, Sheeba Nadarajah5, Richard F Gillum6, Thomas O Obisesan6. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, and Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 3. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 4. Department of Health Education, School of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, and Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 5. Division of Nursing, School of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, and Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 6. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine and Clinical/Translational Science Program, Howard University College of Medicine/Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is increasingly evident that high blood pressure can promote reduction in global and regional brain volumes. While these effects may preferentially affect the hippocampus, reports are inconsistent. METHODS: Using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we examined the relationships of hippocampal volume to pulse pressure (PPR) and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure according to apolipoprotein (APOE) ɛ4 positivity and cognitive status. The ADNI data included 1,308 participants: Alzheimer disease (AD = 237), late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI = 454), early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI = 254), and cognitively normal (CN = 365), with up to 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Higher quartiles of PPR were significantly associated with lower hippocampal volumes (Q1 vs. Q4, p = 0.034) in the CN and AD groups, but with increasing hippocampal volume (Q1, p = 0.008; Q2, p = 0.020; Q3, p = 0.017; Q4 = reference) in the MCI groups. In adjusted stratified analyses among non-APOE ɛ4 carriers, the effects in the CN (Q1 vs. Q4, p = 0.006) and EMCI groups (Q1, p = 0.002; Q2, p = 0.013; Q3, p = 0.002; Q4 = reference) remained statistically significant. Also, higher DBP was significantly associated with higher hippocampal volume (p = 0.002) while higher SBP was significantly associated with decreasing hippocampal volume in the EMCI group (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Changes in PPR, SBP, and DBP differentially influenced hippocampal volumes depending on the cognitive and APOE genotypic categories.
BACKGROUND: It is increasingly evident that high blood pressure can promote reduction in global and regional brain volumes. While these effects may preferentially affect the hippocampus, reports are inconsistent. METHODS: Using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we examined the relationships of hippocampal volume to pulse pressure (PPR) and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure according to apolipoprotein (APOE) ɛ4 positivity and cognitive status. The ADNI data included 1,308 participants: Alzheimer disease (AD = 237), late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI = 454), early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI = 254), and cognitively normal (CN = 365), with up to 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Higher quartiles of PPR were significantly associated with lower hippocampal volumes (Q1 vs. Q4, p = 0.034) in the CN and AD groups, but with increasing hippocampal volume (Q1, p = 0.008; Q2, p = 0.020; Q3, p = 0.017; Q4 = reference) in the MCI groups. In adjusted stratified analyses among non-APOE ɛ4 carriers, the effects in the CN (Q1 vs. Q4, p = 0.006) and EMCI groups (Q1, p = 0.002; Q2, p = 0.013; Q3, p = 0.002; Q4 = reference) remained statistically significant. Also, higher DBP was significantly associated with higher hippocampal volume (p = 0.002) while higher SBP was significantly associated with decreasing hippocampal volume in the EMCI group (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Changes in PPR, SBP, and DBP differentially influenced hippocampal volumes depending on the cognitive and APOE genotypic categories.
Authors: G Peggy McFall; Sandra A Wiebe; David Vergote; David Westaway; Jack Jhamandas; Lars Bäckman; Roger A Dixon Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sara Shams; Tobias Granberg; Juha Martola; Andreas Charidimou; Xiaozhen Li; Mana Shams; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Lena Cavallin; Peter Aspelin; Maria Wiberg-Kristoffersen; Lars-Olof Wahlund Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Andrew D Robertson; Michelle A Messner; Zahra Shirzadi; Galit Kleiner-Fisman; Joyce Lee; Julia Hopyan; Anthony E Lang; Sandra E Black; Bradley J MacIntosh; Mario Masellis Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Timothy M Hughes; Lewis H Kuller; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Rachel H Mackey; Eric M McDade; William E Klunk; Howard J Aizenstein; Ann D Cohen; Beth E Snitz; Chester A Mathis; Steven T Dekosky; Oscar L Lopez Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Markus Donix; Maria Scharf; Kira Marschner; Annett Werner; Cathrin Sauer; Antje Gerner; Josef A Nees; Shirin Meyer; Katharina L Donix; Rüdiger Von Kummer; Vjera A Holthoff Journal: Int J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2013-10-21