The increasing number of patients with neoplasms and survivors[1,2] has raised the
interest of the scientific community in the diagnosis and early management of the
effects of neoplasms and/or their treatments on patients. In that scenario, the injury
caused to the cardiovascular system belongs to a spectrum and can impair all
cardiovascular system structures in a clinically variable way, ranging from asymptomatic
forms to cardiovascular death. Most studies on cardiotoxicity have focused on
ventricular dysfunction because of its presentation severity and because it is the major
cause of late non-oncologic mortality of neoplasm survivors.[3]In oncologic patients, the drugs most commonly related to ventricular dysfunction are
anthracyclines.[4] Recent studies
have reported that the damage related to those drugs, if not identified and treated
early, evolves continuously from cell injury to ventricular dysfunction. In the past
decade, several studies showed that the subclinical detection of cardiotoxicity, by use
of biomarkers, such as troponin and BNP, might be an opportunity to prevent
cardiovascular injury, allowing for early treatment and more appropriate individualized
follow-up.[5-8]Another current challenge regarding cardiotoxicity is to understand the natural history
of neoplasm survivors. Little is known about the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in
those patients, and, thus, no long-term follow-up strategy has been defined for
them.In this issue of the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, Kang et
al.[9] make a relevant
contribution to the diagnosis of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. In a cohort of
survivors of non-Hodgkin's diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with anthracyclines,
those authors have shown that, as compared to healthy controls, those patients have
lower values of circumferential and longitudinal strains on echocardiography in a
population with normal ejection fraction. Such findings have been evidenced mainly by
changes in the subendocardial segments. In accordance with previous studies,[10] those authors have emphasized the
radial strain measure to be of little importance in that population. Inter- and
intraobserver analyses reinforce that data obtained can be safely reproducible.Kang et al.[9] have not observed a direct
relationship between anthracycline doses and strain values, suggesting that the
myocardial damage, reflected on impaired myocardial deformation, can occur even at doses
considered non-cardiotoxic (lower than 240 mg/m2), provided that the
population studied used doses ranging from 150.94 mg/m2 to 440.00
mg/m2.That was an observational study with a small sample, but its finding is clinically
relevant and should be explored. It is yet to be defined whether that finding is only a
marker of chemotherapeutic response or whether it represents the beginning of the
pathophysiology of the clinically manifest cardiovascular lesion. Further studies are
required to clarify whether the neoplasm itself, through its endothelial changes, could
be related to changes in strain.Even without definite responses, the study by Kang et al.[9] contributes to reinforce the importance of combining the
clinical practice with a sensitive non-invasive method to aid the management of
oncologic patients during and after chemotherapy.[10,11]
Authors: Raoul C Reulen; David L Winter; Clare Frobisher; Emma R Lancashire; Charles A Stiller; Meriel E Jenney; Roderick Skinner; Michael C Stevens; Michael M Hawkins Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Heloisa Sawaya; Igal A Sebag; Juan Carlos Plana; James L Januzzi; Bonnie Ky; Timothy C Tan; Victor Cohen; Jose Banchs; Joseph R Carver; Susan E Wiegers; Randolph P Martin; Michael H Picard; Robert E Gerszten; Elkan F Halpern; Jonathan Passeri; Irene Kuter; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Xavier Bosch; Montserrat Rovira; Marta Sitges; Ariadna Domènech; José T Ortiz-Pérez; Teresa M de Caralt; Manuel Morales-Ruiz; Rosario J Perea; Mariano Monzó; Jordi Esteve Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lesley A Smith; Victoria R Cornelius; Christopher J Plummer; Gill Levitt; Mark Verrill; Peter Canney; Alison Jones Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 4.430