BACKGROUND: Bullying and cyberbullying are global public health problems. However, very few studies described prevalence, similarities and differences among face-to-face victims, cybervictims and students who are victimised through both bullying and cyberbullying. This study was conducted to describe these different patterns of victimisation and severity of victimisation, emotional intelligence and technology use in different types of victims. METHOD: A total number of 2,139 secondary school students from 22 schools, randomly selected from all provinces of Andalusia, Spain, participated in this study. Information about bullying, cyberbullying, social networking sites use and perceived emotional intelligence was collected. RESULTS: Face-to-face victimisation only is the most common type of victimisation followed by mixed victimisation. Cybervictimisation only is rare. Mixed victims score higher in severity of bullying and present higher emotional attention than face-to-face victims. CONCLUSIONS: Most victims of cyberbullying are also face-to-face victims. Holistic approach that focuses on different problems at the same time seems to be needed to tackle these behaviours.
BACKGROUND: Bullying and cyberbullying are global public health problems. However, very few studies described prevalence, similarities and differences among face-to-face victims, cybervictims and students who are victimised through both bullying and cyberbullying. This study was conducted to describe these different patterns of victimisation and severity of victimisation, emotional intelligence and technology use in different types of victims. METHOD: A total number of 2,139 secondary school students from 22 schools, randomly selected from all provinces of Andalusia, Spain, participated in this study. Information about bullying, cyberbullying, social networking sites use and perceived emotional intelligence was collected. RESULTS: Face-to-face victimisation only is the most common type of victimisation followed by mixed victimisation. Cybervictimisation only is rare. Mixed victims score higher in severity of bullying and present higher emotional attention than face-to-face victims. CONCLUSIONS: Most victims of cyberbullying are also face-to-face victims. Holistic approach that focuses on different problems at the same time seems to be needed to tackle these behaviours.
Authors: María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes; María Del Mar Molero Jurado; José Jesús Gázquez Linares; Nieves Fátima Oropesa Ruiz; María Del Mar Simón Márquez; Mahia Saracostti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Juan de D Benítez-Sillero; José M Armada Crespo; Esther Ruiz Córdoba; Javier Raya-González Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: David Álvarez-García; Andrea Núñez; María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes; José Carlos Núñez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ana Belén Barragán Martín; María Del Mar Molero Jurado; María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes; María Del Mar Simón Márquez; África Martos Martínez; Maria Sisto; José Jesús Gázquez Linares Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390