Literature DB >> 29693458

Segmental Ureterectomy is Acceptable for High-risk Ureteral Carcinoma Comparing to Radical Nephroureterectomy.

Zixiong Huang1, Xiaowei Zhang1, Xiaopeng Zhang1, Qing Li1, Shijun Liu1, Luping Yu1, Tao Xu1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if segmental ureterectomy (SU) could be chosen for wider oncological indications than low-risk ureteral carcinoma, given the difficulties in accurate preoperative risk stratification determination and kidney-sparing needs for successive therapy.
Methods: Data from ureteral carcinoma patients who underwent open SU or laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2011 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model with patients' baseline characteristics (age, bladder cancer history, hydronephrosis), procedure type, and tumor characteristics (site, size, pathological features) as covariates were used to evaluate oncological outcomes. Life quality parameters including preoperative renal function, Karnofsky performance status, pain score, and surgical complications were set as second endpoints.
Results: Sixty-three patients (24 in SU group, 39 in RNU group) who had at least one high-risk factor were enrolled. In the mean follow-up time of 24.67 months, no significant difference was found in recurrence-free survival (66.7% and 69.2%, p = 0.798), overall survival (79.2% and 84.6%, p = 0.453), and cancer-specific survival (83.3% and 89.7%, p = 0.405) between SU and RNU groups. The Cox regression demonstrated that procedure type was not associated with oncological outcomes. Patients in SU group experienced significant mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increase by 4.60 ml/(min·1.73 m2) (p < 0.001). Proportion of patients having poor eGFR also decreased postoperatively in SU group. Mere tendency in physical performance status improvement and serious complications reduction was detected in SU group.
Conclusion: SU is acceptable for high-risk ureteral carcinoma comparing to RNU with satisfying tumor control efficacy and advantage in renal function preservation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-risk ureteral carcinoma; life quality outcome; oncological outcome; radical nephroureterectomy; segmental ureterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29693458     DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1457192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Surg        ISSN: 0894-1939            Impact factor:   2.533


  2 in total

1.  Oncological and renal outcomes of segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Ryo Nakayama; Tomomi Haba; Makoto Kawaguchi; Akira Komiya; Hiroshi Koike
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Fahad Quhal; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Reza Sari Motlagh; Michael Rink; David D'Andrea; Mohammad Abufaraj; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.